ipl-logo

Biased Juries In To Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee

975 Words4 Pages

Biased juries ruin lives. The reasons behind biased juries vary, but majority of the time it is because of the jury’s own personal morals. Juries’ morals range from racism to simply having a bad experience with the defendant. With biased and unfair juries an appeal can be extremely important to the defendant. In the 1950’s segregation and discrimination were at the highest, this did not help Black men and women. When they were tried, the biased juries would prosecute them as guilty; innocent or not. Appeals were needed to give them a second chance. Harper Lee comments on this social issue in “To Kill a Mockingbird” when Tom Robinson faces a biased jury. Biased juries and appeals are shown in the Mack Ingram trial as well as the Tom Robinson …show more content…

Biased juries are shown with “Ingram’s experience with . . . the legal system [because of] the [struggles] of [being a] Black [man] in the United States” (Lynn). The trial was decided based on the race of Mack Ingram because of the jury that made the final decision. The first jury Ingram faced was an all White man jury with no diversity; they all thought the same and had the same values. Among those values included racism and the belief that Ingram was guilty because he was Black. Similarly, in the Tom Robinson trial racism is relevant, and Reverend Sykes, a prominent man in the Black community comments on the issue. He tells the children he “[has never] seen any jury decide in favor of a [Black] man over a white man …”, proving the fact that juries are racially biased (Lee 238). He explains to Jem how a jury can decide a man’s fate based on the color of his skin. Not whether he is truly innocent or not, but just because he isn’t like them. Juries being racially biased is an unfair way to decide a trial and has landed many Black men in …show more content…

In Mack Ingram’s trial when he first was tried he went before a jury who were racially biased. They convicted him because he looked like another Black man who actually assaulted the girl. He was then given the chance to appeal and try to be proven innocent. During his appeal, “Ingram's appeal went before a mixed jury . . . in a state superior court. . . [and] the court ordered a mistrial” (TIME Magazine). Without appeal, Ingram would have been sitting in prison for a crime he didn't commit. With appeal, defendants have time to overview the trial and gather more evidence to support themselves. Appeal is a very very key part in trials because it can completely turn a case around. Appeal is very powerful, and after his trial, “nothing would happen to Tom Robinson until the higher court reviewed his case, and that Tom had a good chance of going free, or at least of having a new trial” (Lee 250). Tom Robison has a second chance because of appeal. It is a very strong gift that can provide new opportunities for

Show More
Related

Bob Ewell Vs Tom Robinson Essay

1031 Words | 5 Pages

For example, Bob Ewell sends Robinson to jail in the first place. The Ewell family wins the trial, sending Robinson, an innocent man, to jail. The jury during the trial knows that Robinson is in fact innocent. But, because he is black, Robinson is pleaded guilty and sent to jail. This is shown when it takes such a long time for the jury to make the verdict.

Read More

Emmett Till's Second Trial

1018 Words | 5 Pages

W. Kellum told the jury today that ‘your forefathers will turn over in their graves’’ if they convicted two white men of murdering a 14-year-old Chicago negro boy.” (Kolin)This quote proves that the defense had told the jury to make sure that they come to a verdict of not guilty. The outcome of the trial was clearly fixed, for example, “A fourteen-year-old boy, Emmett Till, had been brutally murdered and his body thrown into the Tallahatchie River, but despite clear evidence that two white men committed the crime, an all-white jury returned a "Not Guilty" verdict after just an hour of deliberation.” (Linder Background)This quote proves that the jury was very inclined to reach the verdict of not guilty just because Bryant and Milam are white. The outcome of the trial helped was a major factor leading to the civil rights movement, according to Douglas Linder, “The trial of Roy Bryant and J. W. Milam for the murder of Till shook the conscience of a nation and helped spark the movement for civil rights for black Americans.”

Read More

Louis Riel Trial Essay

804 Words | 4 Pages

One of the most glaring aspects that underline the trial's unfairness was the biases and prejudices that pervaded the courtroom. During this era, the

Read More

Bryan Stevenson's Two-Tiered Justice System

738 Words | 3 Pages

However, according to To Kill A Mockingbird, Atticus explains, “Those are twelve reasonable men in everyday life, ... [but] There’s something in our world that makes men lose their heads—they couldn’t be fair even if they tried” (Lee 220). Atticus is referring to the whites’ hatred toward the blacks. The hatred clouds the white people’s judgement. Even though a jury is made up of peers to make the system more fair, nothing can prevent the jury from being biased too.

Read More

Similarities Between Scottsboro Trial And To Kill A Mockingbird

1103 Words | 5 Pages

In the Scottsboro trials after the first retrial, the case was appealed because the jury violated the 6th amendment and the court did not allow due process. The jury book for the town of Scottsboro did not even have the name of an african-american male on it so the jury was very clearly biased before it was even picked (Scottsboro American Tragedy). In both trials, the defendants were set up for conviction by a jury that put aside the evidence and convicted them because of the color of their

Read More

To Kill A Mockingbird Bedevils The Trial

472 Words | 2 Pages

By taking the word of biased parties on both sides (with the only first-hand witnesses being the parties involved in the alleged crime), prejudice is the only thing left on which the jury can reach a verdict. The evidence is entirely circumstantial, so the jury feels left with the sole option to sentence Tom Robinson to death for being black. Correlating with this evidence is a quote from James Baldwin, a black civil rights reformer and novelist, from a 1965 debate. Baldwin says, “But what is happening in the poor woman, the poor man’s mind is this: they’ve been raised to believe, and by now they helplessly believe, that no matter how terrible their lives may be, and their lives have been quite terrible, and no matter how far they fall, no matter what disaster overtakes them, they have one enormous knowledge in consolation, which is like a heavenly revelation: at least, they are not Black” (Baldwin and Buckley, 1965). This quote resounds within the trial as a whole.

Read More

Juror's Duty In 12 Angry Men

432 Words | 2 Pages

In the court system, jurors are tasked with the duty to conduct a fair verdict based on the testimony given and additional evidence shown. Some may forget this responsibility and use their prejudices that affect the juror's decision on the defendant's future. As a result, the accused may be falsely convicted and lose the majority of their life. The play 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows three perfect examples of prejudices during jury duty such as colorism, classism, and ageism.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Tom Robinson Constitutional Trial

806 Words | 4 Pages

Like Atticus( Scouts father) had once said “the court is as equal as its jury”. Bias can cause many uproars in the court, but a lack of evidence can cause the case to become confusing. Generally evidence is what sets the difference between a wide open case and a closed off one. For example, in the story the defendant Tom was held in prison for one year, while being blocked off

Read More

Similarities Between Rodney King And To Kill A Mockingbird

644 Words | 3 Pages

The judges were afraid the whites would riot against the court. Both the jury and the judges were peer pressured by the people. To Kill a Mockingbird and the beating, trial, and riots of Rodney King show that racism has always existed, and it’s the people that control the court. Evidence can be provided to prove the innocent and guilty, however the people can decide and fight for who “deserves justice.” We the people in which we can stand up and bring

Read More

Explain The Disadvantages Of Inequality And Divisions In To Kill A Mockingbird

365 Words | 2 Pages

When Tom Robinson is accused of a crime he is at a disadvantage because of his skin color. The

Read More

Examples Of A Fair Jury In To Kill A Mockingbird

877 Words | 4 Pages

One aspect of racism is present in the final decision of Tom Robinson’s court case. Tom was accused of raping a young girl named Mayella who has an abusive father named Bob Ewell. Despite the fact that the evidence proves Tom as innocent, it was decided that he was guilty because he is a person of color in court against a white family with an all white jury. While closing the case and trying to defend Tom, Atticus, Tom’s lawyer, states, “Our courts have their faults, as does any human institution, but in this country our courts are the great levelers, and in our courts all men are created equal” (Lee 274). Atticus stating that all men are created equal shows that everyone in court should be treated the same, regardless of race, gender, social status, or anything that is irrelevant to the case.

Read More

The Justice System In Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird

833 Words | 4 Pages

In the book Atticus and the members of the court system express the reach of prejudice, justice, and fairness in the justice system. The justice system was filled with prejudice. In the book it states, “ Now don 't you be so confident, Mr. Jem I ain 't ever seen a jury decide in favor of a colored man over a white man…”(279). Reverend Sykes is witnessing the trial of Tom Robinson.

Read More

To What Extent Did Tom Robinson Have A Fair Trial In To Kill A Mockingbird

866 Words | 4 Pages

In the South of the United States in the 1930´s, the justice system was very unfair towards colored people. Colored people that were sent to court could not receive a fair trial because of the prejudice and racism from the jury. This happened all the time, especially in Maycomb Alabama. In the book To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, a colored man named Tom Robinson was convicted of assaulting a white woman just because of the color of his skin. Tom Robinson should have been found not guilty for many reasons.

Read More

OJ Simpson's Violent Crimes

1588 Words | 7 Pages

This was a key turning point in the case. There was also argument about how the jury rigged the trial as well. Many people said that the jurors were uneducated and didn’t pay attention to detail. Out of 12 members on this jury, 9 of them were black, 2 white, and 1

Read More

Flaws In 12 Angry Men And To Kill A Mockingbird

2194 Words | 9 Pages

Trials held in America at the time of these two productions were never fair to African Americans because of the makeup, views, and general nature of juries. Juries never could fully understand the views and motives of the defendant because they were not consisted of the defendant’s peers. In To Kill A Mockingbird, Tom Robinson was convicted by a jury made up of middle-aged, white men, so they were unable to understand and view the case from Tom’s point of view. When talking to Scout, Atticus says that most people in Maycomb believe that white people are superior to black people, and that is how it is in court as well. He says,,

Read More

More about Biased Juries In To Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee

Related Topics

Open Document