This Chapter begins with the explanation of why the Bible has two different names, and where these names originated from. The Bible is often referred to as Scriptures, which came from the Latin word “scriptura”, and it can be also referred to as The Bible which comes from the Greek word “Biblion”. Many religions have sacred scriptures, but only Christians and Jews refer to their sacred scriptures as the Bible or the Hebrew Bible for Jewish people. Most people tend to use this term as it is seen as more religiously neutral. The Bible itself was not always a book. Before the printing press was invented many of the biblical stories were written on papyrus scrolls, which were marshland strips matted together. Animal skin that was cleaned and stitched …show more content…
The Bible could be seen as a library because similar to a library, the Bible has books that were written by many different authors in very different times. The Bible is also organised like a library, it is organised by topic rather than the time it was written. The Bible may be seen as many books just put together, as each title, are a title of a book, not a chapter. For those who have not studied the bible, or are not well informed about it. They may just refer to the Bible as just one big book. It is true that the Bible has many similar physical features of a single book, for example the fact it has a front and back cover. People tend to get the impression that it is just one book from one author. Whereas if you properly investigate the Bible it will be clear that the Bible has a large variety of different styles of writings and different genres e.g. Historical works, Hymns, …show more content…
The chapter title is “The Bible as Book and as Library”, I felt as though the chapter thoroughly explains why and how the Bible can be referred to as a library and a book. The origins of each name given to the Bible is explained. I found it quite interesting that the author did not just consider one Bible of one religion. They took into account the Jewish Scriptures, the Protestant bible, the Orthodox bible, and the Catholic bible. The author also talks about in quite some detail the structure of each Bible listed above. The author not only explained the similarities and the differences between each Bible and why those differences arose, but they also used a somewhat illustrational form of explaining each bible’s uniqueness. I found this help me completely understand the differences in each Bible’s structure. In each graph the author wrote out each book of the Old Testament and arranged them in the way each religion would group the Books. For example, the Orthodox Old Testament would group the Books in three collections; the historical books, the poetic and didactic books, and the prophetic books. Whereas the Catholic Old Testament would be also grouped in three collections, but with different names which are; the Pentateuch books, the historical and wisdom books, and the prophetic
The book was challenged because of its theme of the illegality and censorship of books. One book people got most angry about was the burning of the Bible.'" (Hooper 1). Even though this book contains controversial thoughts about the Bible, this form does not need to be completed; on behalf of the necessity for
In the two passages it talks about Harriet Tubman and her legacy. In each there are of course similarities and differences. I will refer to them as the first one, Leaders of the Civil War: Harriet Tubman, and the second one, The Woman Called Moses. These passages are very well structured. They are also written in her perspective instead of others.
Bart D. Ehrman. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. New York: Oxford University Press, Fifth edition, 2012 SUMMARY The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings is an 536 page, illustrated, historical guide to early Christianity and many of the early writings of the time—not just those of the New Testament Canon. As the title boasts it is used as an introduction textbook for scholars studying the New Testament.
Furthermore, the authors, both create an overall theme of religion using different forms of imagery throughout their books. This creates an almost spiritual text constantly alluding to the idea of
When it comes to comparing two things, there will always be the similarities and differences. An example of comparing two things can be found in a sermon of Jonathan Edwards, “Sinner in the Hands of Angry God,” and a poem “Wrath of God” by Luke Easter. In Jonathan’s sermon “Sinner in the Hands of Angry God” it talks about the ruthless wrath of God to those who did not believe in Him and this sermon was taken place in the First Great Awakening. While, “Wrath of God” who was written by a Christian poet, Luke Easter have similar meaning like the “Sinner in the Hands of Angry God,” but was written way after the First Awakening. Although both the poem and the sermon are not written by the same author or same type of media, there are some things
When talking about the bible it is not important to reach the conclusion on the conversation it is important to start the conversation. Interpretation of the bible needs to be an open mind. Some people are going to think differently of the bible than you; but you have to keep an open mind because there is no right or wrong answer. You also have to forget what everyone else is telling you about the bible to be able to have your view and interpret what you think of it with the opinion of other people. The bible does not only have one view and as Brueggemann states, “The Bible requires human interpretation which is inescapably subjective.”
The books that are being compared and contrasted are both about The Civil War and what these soldiers went through. Each book has a few differences that separate them. The books are based on the same time period so they are going to have a lot in common. The books describe what both characters had to go through during the war. The differences in the book will show you how each soldier went through the war differently and the similarity’s will show you how it was for most of the soldiers in the Civil War.
Even though both authors write in the same type of style they differ in their themes, points of view, and symbols used to portray these
Although the texts have similarities they also have distinct perspectives on
Some of these differences are related to the differences we learned about in the reading
This did not cover every book of the Bible; in fact there are some books for which we simply do not know who the author is. Hebrews is one book that took a long time for the church to recognize; now, don't have in mind that the church just decrees that now this is authoritative. But it did take
A literary device that was commonly used in both books was allusion. As I was reading both books I would find myself reading references the author has made. In A room with a view they make many allusions relating to art, music, literature, etc. Chapter 6 starts with a reference to Greek mythology. The chapter starts by saying, " It was Phaethon who drove them to Fiesole that memorable day, a youth all irresponsibility and fire, recklessly urging his master 's horses up the stony hill.
He read a bible before with very diverse groups of opinions, but; that did not conform well to the data of the Bible. Inerrancy is not the word for the Bible rather for ways of acting. Overall, I agree with Stanley’s point of view because it really seemed more gravitated toward my generation. Indeed, the Bible is important but the overall significance of faith should be based on Jesus’ principles and the history that comes with
This method looks at the biblical narrative not as a historical source that something lies behind the text. But, it looks at the narrative as a literary text that may be analysed in literary terms that is plot, characterization, point of view in narrative like other works of literature. Narrative criticism reads biblical narratives as literature or story, taking a fiction approach, which treats the text as art or poetry. They interpret the text in its final form in terms of its own story world.
The bible is what helps keeps our faith alive as it contains a rich amount of history that tells us of God’s revelation and the ways how our faith works. Although the bible contains numerous works of different people, it is still a work of God that helps our faith remain constant and grow, as everything written was under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. In some way, I was able to understand the value also of the other books, as before I did not really take interest of the other books included bible, aside from the likes of the Gospels, Genesis, Exodus, Psalms, and Proverbs. Nevertheless, I realized that the books are all part of the bible as each has a purpose to serve and stands as a testament to the infidelity of mankind, and of God’s unfailing love for