Biddy: Book Vs Movie

Have you ever wondered about living forever? Do you think it is possible to live forever?Has someone told you they can live forever?That’s where this story starts.

Throughout the movie, Ender was portrayed as a brilliant and gifted boy, despite his young age. In comparison to the book, in which he was shown as very insightful and quick-witted, the film didn’t show the skillful side of him during the battles. As for physical characteristics, the author originally wrote the character as a blonde, fragile child, about six years old during the beginning of the story, but in the movie, the character was taller, seemingly ten years old, and brunette. Since the book focused more on the psychological aspect of Ender, the reader is able to see in depth how much he blamed himself for wounding others, whilst in the film, he seemed to be detached from the pain he caused. In the course of the movie, it is not explicitly

Hatchet does a better job of telling the story.Hatchet has very descriptive and exciting words.Even though ‘A cry in the wild is a movie’, I think it could explain the movie better.Like have a more exciting,get you off the edge of the seat, kind of movie.For example,in the book i feel like the scences were shorter.I was a little disappionted.I think that the bear scene could be longer.Also the tornado wasn’t that big .I mean yeah it destoryed his shelter but it could have been more disturitve.Maybe it could have hurt Brian.That’s why I think Hatchet is better than the

There are several distinct differences, as well as similarities, between the TWM book and the TWM movie. The main differences between the book and movie are Mitch and Janine’s relationship, the order and the location of the topics discussed, and Mitch’s job did not go on strike in the book. The main similarities are the aphorisms, the tape recorder, and the topics discussed.

Be filled with different emotions with this story, freak the mighty. Both the book and the movie are enjoyable, but they share many and differences and similarities and differences. Freak the Mighty and the movie The Mighty make you absorb literature.

The Nightjohn movie was very different from the book. One reason that it was so

A drastic choice is whether or not to stab someone in the eye with a butter knife. In the book Divergent by Veronica Roth, someone was stabbed in the eye. In the movie based off the book, this scene wasn’t even shown.There are some differences between the book and the movie. Stabbing someone in the eye with a butter knife was just one of the many changes made.

No matter how hard directors and screenwriters try, it is impossible for any movie to be a perfect reflection of the detailed plot and intricate characters presented in a novel. I had watched the film adaption of Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend prior to reading the book, I was very aware of major differences from the get go. The to main categories that I could see differences being placed in were emotion and action. Many aspects of the book were changed to emphasize both either emotion or action for the film. Considering pieces of literature cannot be easily transferred to the screen, few of these changes were very necessary.

Suspicion can be fascinating but haunting. Since Victorian times, the suspicious death case of Sir Charles Baskerville in The Hound of the Baskerville has intrigued/compelled vast amounts of readers. However, recent audiences are more compelled to stories with a modern twist of horror and gruesomeness. Because of less main characters, a fast-paced plot, and the differing point of view of Atwood’s The Hound of the Baskervilles film adaptation, the film has a frightening, intriguing mood with a new perspective compared to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s original novel.

The incredible journey that changed their point of view. The Incredible Journey and the movie Homeward bound: The Incredible Journey were very inspirational. The Book was the tail of two dogs and a cat travel across Canada to try and find Luaths master and go home. In the movie they were on a journey but the events are a little different. They are very similar, but they differ in characters, setting, and adventures. And that is a little about the book and movie.

The “Nightjohn” book and movie had many differences. The plot and story were kind of

Werner is a special German soldier who has the job of inventing “transceivers” and tracking down radios. Though he is very intelligent, he is only around the age of 16. Marie-Laure is a French girl who is disabled by the loss of her sight. In this winding, capturing story, All the Light We Cannot See by Anthony Doerr, the two characters meet face to face. Werner had traveled a lot for his time. Marie-Laure was completely oblivious to the fact that Werner had ever laid his eyes on her before the time they had met in her uncle’s house. Marie-Laure’s uncle had a very large radio in the attic of his mansion. Everyday that he was gone, she continued his work by either reading a story or speaking for people with loved ones missing. At the end of her program, she would play a lovely tune that enchanted the soul. Sergeant Von Rumpel is a dying cow☺ on a mission to find a very magical stone called the Sea of Flames. After finding the three duplicates, he is able to find the explicit stone. The stone though, is left behind with a blind teenager names Marie-Laure. I give this book a B+. The book was very well written and used a lot of

I think that the story was very interesting because it is different than what I normally read or watch. Normally I would read a book about sports or something that interests me. This book made me wanna go out of my comfort zone and read something that I normally wouldn’t read because I found out that I like these types of books.

Gavin Hood 's adaptation of Orson Card’s book Ender’s game is a great representation of awesomeness.Ender wiggin played by Asa Butterfield is an example of pure genius but however some of the details are off such as him at graduation battle instead of his toon being in different rooms, they are right there with him throughout the whole battle when they destroyed the whole bugger planet.Another detail that was left out of the book is the chapters in the book that were just all about Valentine and Peter.I think this is good for the movie because in the book it was kind of long and drug out.If they put this in the Movie it would make it longer and most likely lose the audience!Another key detail that I think

Ms. Pettigrew seemed to fit the role well, except for I thought she would be dressed a little more properly. She also seems a lot older in the film. I get the mother/daughter relationship between Delysia and Ms. Pettigrew more in the movie than I did in the book. I thought Nick physically fit the character in the book, but I imagined him more violent in the book. Michael was good representation other than the fact that I thought he was more violent than Nick was. I also thought that Michael had more money. In the book it said he had plenty of money, but in the movie he made it sound like he was living off of dimes. Phil was a lot younger than I thought he seemed to be in the book. I pictured him as a middle aged producer, not the son of a producer.