Are those who are happier also more likely to be more extraverted?
Introduction
Are those who are happier also more likely to be more extraverted? Extraversion is operationally defined by The Big 5 Personality measure as having high levels of activity, assertiveness and cheerfulness. Those who are considered to have this personality trait tend to be more friendly, excitement-seeking and enjoy being in social situations. There have been large amounts of research which has been carried out in order to attempt to explain the causes of happiness, and a considerable amount has shown that extraversion is closely related (McCrae and Costa, 1980, Tamir, 2009). This report aims to look at The Five-Factor Model as a part of the Big 5 personality test,
…show more content…
The significance of this paper to the report is that is has used both the Big 5 Personality Measure and the Oxford Happiness Inventory, there has not been much research that uses both these measures to look at the association of extraversion and happiness, and most use students or small samples. Further research is needed with a larger and more diverse sample of participants in order for these results to be backed, this is what the following study aims to do.
Overall this essay aims to explore the relationship between extraversion and happiness. The hypothesis of this study is: ‘Those who are more extroverted are more likely to be happy’. As previous research has shown there is a supposed link between social interaction and positive effect although most of the studies, including the ones above, include multiple variables as a factor for increasing happiness, this study will only be looking at extraversion and happiness as defined by the Big 5 Personality Measure and The Oxford Happiness
…show more content…
The independent variable was happiness and this was operationally defined by the Oxford Happiness Scale, participants were allocated one of two groups (happy or less happy) before having to complete a Big 5 Personality test which was used to look at the levels of extraversion; the dependent variable. Materials:
The materials that were used consisted of one happiness questionnaire given to each participant followed up by a big 5 personality questionnaire, each carried out in an empty classroom. Afterwards each participant was given a chocolate bar for taking part in the study.
Procedure
Participants were selected from volunteers from a school, college and university in Bristol. All participants gave their informed consent and those who were under 18 obtained parental consent. Participants were tested in empty classrooms and an effort was made to keep participants separated so they couldn’t see each other’s answers. No talking was allowed throughout and a researcher was present during the whole study to keep an eye on participants. Initially the participants are asked to carry out the Oxford Happiness Scale, the results were interpreted by researchers and from this were assigned into one of two groups, happy or less happy. After a 2 hour break both groups were given the Big 5 Personality questionnaire under the same conditions, again researchers interpreted the results
In the search for happiness, both Ginny Graves and Ruth Whippman present their own ideas and beliefs. I believe that Whippman is more persuasive compared to Ginny Graves through her use of arguments and evidence. This can be attributed to Whippman’s arguments being reinforced with evidence and her expertise on the matter. Firstly, the use of real-life examples and statistics by Whippman provides context for her arguments, thus strengthening them.
Extroverts will likely recognize the behavior described in their friends and family, and be reminded that while extroversion certainly has much to offer, so does introversion. This is a book that intends to improve all aspects of life through appreciation of diverse skills and tendencies, a book that simultaneously calls out the flaws in our culture and shows us the way to fix them. This is a book for everyone, loud or
Arguably, the happier an individual is, the better the quality of their life, and the better off they are. But despite this, there are people who will even argue that lower levels of happiness are the best because you maintain the ability to progress in life and your motivation is still present. Although many people will only see two sides to this argument, there is a totally different view that provides the optimal quality of life and the most beneficial outcome in the big picture; and that is moderate happiness. Cliff Oxford’s essay “High Performance Happy” evaluates the effect that an individual’s happiness has on their beneficiality to society and how you should always strive to be the happiest you can be. Oxford’s main point is that
Extraverting and Introverting relates to how individuals energize themselves. (Baron, 1998). Extroverts enjoy small group interaction where they can talk their thoughts and ideas out. These types of activities help them concentrate and be more engaged. (Lawrence, 1997).
“Happiness doesn’t depend on any external conditions, it is governed by our mental attitude,” (Carnegie). Many chemicals that people’s bodies produce affect how a person feels, some of the chemicals produced may be the reason that someone feels happy. “The researchers found three genetic variants for happiness… The genetic variants for happiness are mainly expressed in the central nervous system and the adrenal glands and pancreatic system,” (Okbay). The nervous system runs throughout everyone’s bodies, meaning the genetic variants affect everyone and how they feel, whether or not they are happy.
A subscale of Ryff’s Scale of Psychological Well-Being entitled Positive Relations with Others was employed (Ryff, 1989), using a six-point Likert scale (0 = totally disagree, 5 = totally agree). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the scale in the present study is 0.83. A demographic data sheet was used to obtain information about gender, age, education,
The NEO PI-R is a questionnaire written by Costa and McCrae (1992) to measure five major domains of personality, which are Neuroticism (N), Extraversion (E), Openness (O), Agreeableness (A) and Conscientiousness (C), and six specific traits that define each domain. It consists
This model develops from the idea that five different dimensions can capture the most common personality traits: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability and Openness. First, a person with an extraversion personality tends to be the center of attention and lives by the motto “the more the merrier”(Jensen-Campbell & Graziano, 2001). Blair shows to have this trait by always expressing her emotions to others. She isn’t afraid to let people know her issues and how she is feeling. For example, Blair and her best friend Serena van der Woodsen competed with one another to see who could get into Yale.
The concept of personality has fascinated psychologists for years. Allport proposed the hierarchy of traits – cardinal, central, and secondary traits (Allport, 1945). Cattell also proposed his theory, the sixteen dimensions of human personality (Cattell, 1944). Jung developed a type-based theory of personality, with different dichotomous personality categories, which was further developed by Myers and Briggs in 1962 to produce the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Ford, 2013). Some psychologists have even argued that personality does not exist; that people change behaviour over time and across various situations.
The results showed that extraversion and introversion affect sexual behavior. Extraverts engage in more sexual activities and had intercourse more frequently than
In the world, the population is more than half extroverted, and less than half introverted; in other words, its around fifty-fifty. Even if everyone on this earth is either introvert or extrovert, there are still misconceptions about each one. As humans, we often misunderstand people’s social preferences; being an introvert or an extrovert is often the misunderstood qualities about us. To start off, being an introvert is misinterpreted as being pompous or depressed. I had a friend, nicknamed Cubby, in third grade.
Happy people are more open and easier to approach in public. Additionally, as Susan David states, “In some cases, they even help broaden how we think and act by directing our attention to new information and opportunities” (David 124). By being happy, one is more likely to listen to other people to learn the way they think or feel about a certain thing. Someone is even more likely to accept what is said or even start to feel that way about that particular topic as well. Happiness has other benefits as well.
PERMA model The PERMA model of Seligman (2011) suggests that people are most happy when they experience positive emotions, engagement, positive relationships, meaning and achievement. Therefore Seligman describes a multimodal construct for which happiness can be measured from these 5 components (fig.1). The PERMA model predecessor was the “Authentic happiness model” of Seligman, in which he first described happiness consisting of three components: meaning, positive emotions and engagement (Seligman, 2003). In Seligman’s recent PERMA model, he states that happiness is a multidimensional subjective construct build up out of the five components.
Extraverts are characterized behaviorally by sociability and impulsiveness and physiologically by a low level of cortical arousal. They are likable, quick-witted, optimistic, and have other traits that are indicative of people who are rewarded for their association with others. Introverts, by contrast, are characterized by unsociability and caution
A collection of philosophical, religious, psychological and biological approaches had attempted to define happiness and analyze its connections. Researchers have found that about 50% of people happiness depends on our genes, based on studies of identical twins, whose happiness was 50% correlated even when growing up in different houses. About 10% to 15% is a result of various measurable life circumstances variables, such as socioeconomic status, marital status, health, income, and others. The remaining 40% is a combination of intentional factors and the results of actions that individuals deliberately engage in to become happier. Studies have also found that most of us are born with a fixed “set point” of happiness that we fall in throughout our lives.