The world is a very interesting place, with lots of different plant and animal species. While man has succeeded in identifying and classifying most of these organisms, some are still the products of speculations and conspiracy. An example is Bigfoot, or Sasquatch as it is referred to in some circles. This animal species, or entity, is a gorilla-like creature that is believed to exist by some, and dismissed as mere imagination and fantasy by others. Mystery surrounds the existence of big foot, and this fuels the speculation, making the existence of the creature a topic that has intrigued and interested anthropologists and enthusiasts in equal measure. Therefore, it is prudent to evaluate the existence of big foot, or lack thereof of, based on the hypothesis that big foot is merely a product of fiction without any scientific backing. One fact against the existence of big foot is the apparent lack of any fossil records or bone structure of a creature similar to big foot that has ever been excavated. If indeed big foot exists in the current world, then researchers could …show more content…
The perceived video and photo evidence depict it as a fairly massive animal, larger than modern man and in the same league as a grizzly bear. However, these photo and video evidences are always of poor quality, possibly the result of photo and video editing techniques. If indeed Sasquatch exists and is of the size depicted, then he would not have avoided valid and verifiable human sightings for so long. The contemporary world is made defined by phones that have cameras, and with everyone owning phones, it would have taken minutes for big foot to be sighted and recorded if he really existed. Additionally, he is presented as a diurnal animal, and this improved the chances for constant sightings if he really existed. However, the lack of constant and verifiable sightings possibly shows that Bigfoot is mere
The presence of epiphyseal plates suggest the two smaller skeletons were still developing and growing. Overall there were two older women over 30 and two male children still growing. 2. What is a black-legged tick and what issues are associated with it?
The term “bigfoot” was coined in 1958 when a bulldozer operation found the tracks while working. These tracks were discovered in Bluff Creek, California; moreover, this was the same location where the famous film of Bigfoot happened in 1967. This film has been researched for centuries and is still researched to this day to find out if it was real or faked. No matter what culture or country, the sasquatch was a tall, hairy, and foul-smelling creature that always disappeared when a human tried to further investigate. Bigfoot is believed to be a primitive human, a unevolved version of our kind.
The skeleton, who was nicknamed "Ardi," lived in a woodland, weighed about 50 kilograms (110 pounds) and was about 120 centimeters (3-4 feet) tall (Gibbons 37). She was as big as a chimpanzee and had similar brain size. Unlike apes, Ardi did not knuckle-walk or swing through the tree, she walked upright, and perhaps her diet consisted of nuts, insects, and small mammals found in the woods. Most researchers agree that Ardi is an early hominin but not everyone agrees about that they walked upright and what Ardi revealed about our
“Bigfoot” Wallace : A humble American Hero Wallace “Bigfoot” Wallace : A humble American Hero “Bigfoot” Wallace was a true American hero, he fought in eight battles and was a member of the Texas ranger division . “Bigfoot” Wallace was Born in Lexington, Virginia on April 3, 1817, young William was a very large kid at 6 '2 and 240 pounds and he worked hard on his father 's fruit orchard. He got the nickname “bigfoot” from his large feet. His family had moved to Texas when his two brothers were sadly killed in the Goliad Massacre. His family settled in the city of LaGrange in 1837.
Bigfoot was a great Texas ranger he in was in many wars and battles he was always with texas he did many things in his lifetime. He scared off a whole group of indians by himself. He born in Lexington, Virginia in April 3,1793 and died in 1836.He lived a long life when he was older he told stories of the great ventures into danger as a texas ranger
Why do so many people not believe in sensational subjects such as bigfoot? Because such a huge animal like that would surely at least leave some evidence behind, and then there's the fact that there can't just be one bigfoot or mythical creature everyone claims to see. There would theoretically have to be more than one. Although we all might like to believe in the possibility of such creatures, why would you actively believe that there are mythical beings out there without proof? Although there are some people that are quite naive and will easily believe such things without any proof whatsoever.
The events from Steve Irwin’s death and the big Bloop are correct in context, but not in substance. By adding implausible details and worst case scenarios to both events, the reader will process the information and freak out because our culture is conditioned to
If the legend has left so much evidence why hasn’t someone captured this beast? Why hasn’t some found more than just hair samples and footprints? Why should we believe them at all? People have believed several different things that Big Foot has done or eats or the video evidence of just some college kid running around near the road to scare people and think they just saw the legend of Big Foot. There has been numerous false sightings because, people just said they saw Big Foot just so they can be on television and that takes down the chances of the people ever catching the legend and our chances are already very slim.
Ever since the first Bigfoot sighting, in 1811 there has been disputes on whether or not, this creature could even exist for so long without others finding it, but there are those who claim they “know what they saw” and those people are ones who have had close encounters with Bigfoot. Although many say that Bigfoot is a hoax, there are those who firmly believe in the fact that they are truly out there, and there are multiple well-funded Bigfoot research groups, working to find them, and prove their existence. Research groups such as the Sasquatch Genome Project work together with those in the world who have seen Bigfoot, and try and debunk those who are loony, and also find the ones that may have some legitimacy to them. Overall, people seem to agree on one thing when it comes to Bigfoot, and that’s their appearance. Most descriptions start with saying that their build is very large, powerful, muscular, and
Lots of evidence has been proven to convince people of his existence. People who have come to Bigfoot close say he smells like rotting food or skunks (McClellan 13). Ostman, a lumberjack, claimed that a Bigfoot family captured him (Krensky 30-31). Gerald Crew found a set of large footprints at his construction site in California
There isn 't a possible way something so big could hide from the such a populated world. Another big reason why bigfoot is fake is because the most common form of evidence is by far video or eyewitness reports. This is a very unreliable type of evidence, ether in the video, "Bigfoot" can be
Bigfoot legend has been around for nearly 50 years now, and nobody has yet to find hard core evidence of his existence. In 2012 a man named Rick Dyer claimed that he had killed bigfoot and went public. He went on
From someone as clever and experienced as Rob Carlson, a paper named Bigfoot Stole My Wife, will at the very least be entertaining. In this essay, it will explain what Bigfoot Stole My Wife what occurred in it, what is causing Narrator to lie, and what it says in our culture. First off, the humorous satire at what types of articles that may be found in less than reliable newspapers or websites. In BigFoot Stole My Wife, it displays the story of a man who convinced himself that bigfoot had broken into his house and took his wife away. This is a huge leap in logical, to say the least.
Conclusion All in all, the Mythical creature Bigfoot is fake! The evidence people have found, have been placed there by others who want trick
BIOLOGY RESEARCH ESSAY There is great speculation around evolution. As we are continually in the process of discovering the history of human beings, there are many questions surrounding this topic. One very interesting question is why ancient ancestors of homo-sapiens evolved to walk upright like we do today. An apes’ DNA is astonishingly similar to that of a humans, (97% the same) and yet, our bones’ shapes and structure are very different.