The debate over America’s health care reform has been contested for many years. In his 1993 speech to Congress, America’s former president, Bill Clinton conveys that America’s first step toward “change” is the reform of their health care system. He adopts a friendly but a determined tone to invite and persuade the citizens to the change, while implementing slightly emphasized diction and several factual evidences to support his claim. In the opening of the speech, Clinton’s use of a friendly but a determined tone invites the citizens to attention and persuades them to participate in the “change” of America, first starting with the reform of their health care. Clinton begins by saying, “My fellow Americans, tonight we come together.” Clinton’s purpose is not only to provide the citizens an intimate sense, but to abandon his superior image as a president. Through this technique, Clinton is able to draw the audiences’ attention naturally like a friend. He then …show more content…
Clinton explains that “on any given day, over 37 million Americans have no health insurance at all [and that their] medical bills are growing at over twice the rate of inflation.” By applying facts and statistics, Clinton not only makes the audiences gain more credibility from him but also makes them reflect on how much they have already invested on health care just like the facts have stated. Furthermore, Clinton makes people surmise the benefits and savings that will result from the health care reform which will help bolster his claim. Ultimately, there is no doubt that Clinton is able to advocate for the health care reform of America by implementing a combination of a friendly but a determined tone, slightly emphasized diction and factual reasoning. Although Clinton made a significant first step, it is important for the American society to continue making strides toward more affordable and efficient health care
The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.
“Healthcare Reform 101,” written by Rick Panning (2014), is a wonderful article that describes, in an easy-to-understand language, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law March 23, 2010. The main goal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was to provide affordable, quality healthcare to Americans while simultaneously reducing some of the country’s economic problems. Two areas will be covered throughout this paper. The first section will include a summary of the major points and highlights of Panning’s (2014) article, including an introduction to the ACA, goals of the signed legislation, provided coverage, and downfalls of the current healthcare system. The second part will be comprised of a professional
In 2009, President Barack Obama constructed a speech to inform the people of the problems we had in our healthcare system. Previously, there had been many instances of people who didn’t own any healthcare coverage, and in return they suffered from debt from medical bills. He challenges your mind to think critically over all the hard, concrete logos he uses throughout his speech. After he provides strong logos for the medicare providers, he shows vivid imagery about things that would be changed to help the people and our economy alike. While he gives this strong well rounded speech, he keeps his composure and controls his facial expressions.
The affordable care act presented the United States with the most extensive overhaul since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid in the 1960’s. The act was a response to staggering statistics on the price of healthcare and the resulting uninsured rate within the United States. The affordable care act uses Individual Mandate and Health Insurance Exchanges to combat major factors causing high insurance cost and low insured rates. As with most reform, the public has not been one hundred percent unified on the potential effectiveness of the Affordable Care Act.
In the address, Clinton says “We will meet them by going forward as one America, by working together in our communities,.... Our workplaces across the entire spectrum of our civic life.” Clinton is saying the government is not going to hold your hand and give you everything, but they will provide you with some welfare. The welfare they give you, however, will encourage the recipients to be more self reliant. They need to work in their communities.
President Obama spoke to the American people that government run health care with higher taxation, larger prices, and letting the insurance agencies operate with little to no rules were “wrong”. It was to improve and provide all Americans with affordable health care and easier access to doctors and medical care and offer subsidies
have a political appeal since it had a synthesis of both liberal and conservative ends. The wrong elements of the reform that they also thought had a political appeal were strongly opposed by interest groups, leading to a subsequent failure of the reform (Hoffman, 2011, para. 33). The greatest undoing of the Clinton’s administration was they were overambitious by simultaneously trying to secure universal coverage, transforming the sector into a managed care, controlling costs, regulation of the private insurance market and also changing the financing of the sector through an employer mandate.
A Second Look at the Affordable Care Act David E. Mann, ABA American Military University POLS210 Abstract Since the passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), twenty-eight states have either filed joint or individual lawsuits to strike down the PPACA. This document will examine a few key elements that the President of the United States must take into consideration when reviewing the act and moving forward to either ratify the act, replace the act, or leave the act as it is. Topics that will be presented will include; the current issues being debated, two competing thoughts on how to fix the ACA, an evaluation of the preferred solution, and finally the responsibility of each level of government. Patient
The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.
Given that he spoke for the American people, he implies that as a nation, we have had to make some difficult choices, but, yet we make those decisions with courage and determination that keeps us united. This is one of the many points that highlights his speech. Giving positive and strong statements adds strength to his speech which keeps his audience occupied with his words. Hence, it is very important that audience is listening and comprehending what is being
A heavily debated topic in politics in America is on the distribution of Healthcare and health insurance. The main concern is the costs that come along with healthcare and who exactly it is or should be accessible to. Currently in the United States, our nation’s healthcare is under a plan called the Affordable Care Act, implemented by Barack Obama to which many nickname “Obamacare”. The ACA’s original goal was to cater to people of all classes and make it affordable, hence the name, but that plan has not proven to be very effective. However in recent times there has been a debate among presidential candidates of what action to take regarding healthcare including ideas such as a “single payer” system, or a universal healthcare plan as well as a flat tax.
It utilizes both logos and pathos in order to convince the audience of their standpoint. They list many statistics including how much health care costs per person. With all these statistics, the audience can conclude that America does not have enough money to give every individual health care. The author also runs through the fact that America's government does not have the managerial capabilities to keep this system functioning. When the audience comprehends this fact, they can logically conclude that a universal health care plan will not be effectively instituted if it is set into law.
Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.
Sicko is an American documentary by Michael Moore which explores the status of health care in America. In my opinion, he has presented a clear-cut viewpoint that American health care is not producing results. Nearly half a hundred million Americans, according to Sicko, are not insured while the rest, who are insured, are often sufferers of insurance company deceit and also red tape. Additionally, Sicko mentions that the United States health care system is placed 37th out of 191 by the W.H.O. with definite health measures, like the neonate death and life probability, equivalent to countries with quite less financial wealth. Interviews are carried out with individuals who supposed they had sufficient coverage but were deprived of care.
Bill Clinton is known as one of the most powerful speakers in the United States, and he impresses his audience by his speeches and the rhetorical devices that he includes in his speeches and addresses. For example, he effectively delivers his inaugural address with a convincing tone and some of the rhetorical devices such as allusions and strong diction. In his 1993 inaugural address, Clinton discussed the issues that America faced in the 20th century such as health care costs and low wages. He mentioned that these issues are not solved because America has not “made changes” and made progress to solve the conflicts and restore the economy. Because of this, Clinton knew it was important to ensure that all of the nation was behind him, and if