Anurag Kashyap Black Friday Analysis

One may also question the propriety of a movie of this nature being made and released when the matter is still sub judice before the appellate Court. It might have the tendency to prejudice the judicial mind and interfere with the process of justice. It may be recalled that the release of Anurag Kashyap’s movie ‘Black Friday’ on 1993 Bombay blasts was stayed by the Court till the appeals were finally disposed of by the Supreme Court. Anyway, there has not been any such objection against this movie so far. Possibly because there is a general sense of lack of closure with respect to the Arushi case, and a prevalent wide spread feeling that the judgment is unjust and perverse. It is only a natural outcome of social dynamics that when the constitutional

This contaminated possible evidence. They had failed to check the veracity of the statements of the Tandons', when they said the faulty AC in their room, due to the noise it cause, made it impossible to hear any noises that came from outside the room. Secondly, to prove that the parents were involved in the wrong doing, they took the evidence of a router switching on and off, which they assumed was being done by hand each time. Thirdly, even when blood on the terrace padlock was pointed out to Inspector Dhaniram, he merely dismissed it as rust. When a similar stain was shown on the stairs, clearly proving that it could not be rust, even then, the Inspector refused to acknowledge it as evidence. Furthermore, a bloodstained handprint found on the wall of the terrace was failed to be reported to the forensic team. This meant that a lot of crucial evidence that could definitely identify the killer was either neglected or ignored outright. The police even went to the length that since the parents had Furthermore, the testimony of the witnesses was recorded and presented in such a way that it would back up the hypothesis of the police. Furthermore, this hypothesis itself was born out of the gossip-mongering that Dr.