ipl-logo

Blaise Pascal The Nature Of God Analysis

1557 Words7 Pages

Blaise Pascal adopts a one of a kind strategy in noting the endless question of God 's presence. Rather than belligerence for or against His reality like all those before him, Pascal strays from the generally accepted way to go and measures the merits against the inconveniences of the decision to accept. His contention, be that as it may, is jumbling, and welcomes the question; can faith in God really be diminished to a bet? Moreover, does this talk on confidence in God fit a bet 's status?
Utilizing the thought of interminability for instance, Pascal reminds his gathering of people that there exist thoughts which are outside human ability to understand; however this does not deny their reality. I would contend that it affirms the weaknesses of humankind notwithstanding such ideas, encourage fortifying Pascal 's idea of confidence in God as a bet. For when looking at a thought so expansive and jumbling as the presence of God we should concede overcome as in the very way of the idea disallows us from the grip of an entire comprehension. As Pascal clarifies, ".we do not know.the nature of God, …show more content…

Blaise Pascal, using rationale, builds up that in the example of faith in God, the correct decision may not be likened to reality; rather it is what is sheltered. An examination of Pascal 's coherent workings turns out to be not just an proper, additionally the best accessible choice.
With the direction of Pascal 's coherent bet, the objective being can just reason that it is further bolstering his good fortune to putting stock in God thus he/she should. This freshly discovered energy about the estimation of such a conviction will lead to the formation of a superior self-combined with a fifty-fifty possibility of endless euphoria; one should be prepared to set out upon the way to

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Anne Lamott's Traveling Mercies: Some Thoughts On Faith

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    How do you allow God to take control of your life and entrust that everything will be okay? This was the type of question author Anne Lamott (2006) baffled with in these next few chapters. Lamott (2006) shares her personal life story of entrusting God in her book Traveling Mercies: Some Thoughts on Faith. This paper will provide a summary of chapters two thru four, combined with a personal reflection, and conclude with a few desired questions that ideally could be answered by Lamott.

    Read More

  • The Wager Rhetorical Analysis

    739 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this essay I will be writing about Blaise Pascal, a mathematician and French philosopher whose work became very popular due to his "Wager". Pascal's argument in his essay "The Wager" states that any rational human should believe in God. He states that regardless of whether or not God exists, the option of believing yields the greatest benefit and the least loss out of all the possibilities. In believing in God, one can receive infinite gain which is heaven, if God exist, and would only have finite losses if God does not exist. However, he shares that if one was to bet against god, if one wins or loses, the individual would either gain an insignificant finite if God does not exist, or lose everything if God does exist which would lead to going to Hell.

    Read More

  • Rationalism In Rudolf Otto's The Idea Of The Holy

    1021 Words  | 5 Pages

    The human mind’s ability and innate desire to justify and explain the world and its phenomena has led to some of the most significant and world-altering discoveries and inventions, illustrated throughout the renaissance, enlightenment, scientific revolution, and industrial revolution. Logical pursuits comprise a significant capstone of human nature and progress. However, according to Rudolf Otto in The Idea of the Holy, these tendencies have created different dimensions of religion; the rational and non-rational, with the latter often times overlooked. The most significant difference between the rational and non-rational aspects of religion deal with their respective emphasis on reason and feeling. Rudolph Otto prioritizes the non-rational as offering a truer understanding of religion because he claims the core of all religious life revolves around experiences and feeling, not simply rational thought.

    Read More

  • John Searle Dualism Research Paper

    1272 Words  | 6 Pages

    13. Explain and evaluate Pascal’s Wager. Would belief based on such an argument get you into heaven? - When reviewing Pascal Wagner’s theory one could say that it does not guarantee you heaven. According to what I read, it stated that there are a lot of different religions and within those religions they have specific beliefs to follow to be part of their religion.

    Read More

  • JL Mackie's Argument For The Existence Of God?

    295 Words  | 2 Pages

    Under these options, one is free to follow his/her passionate nature and believe whatever one would like to believe. Concerning the existence of God, James thinks that belief in God’s existence is a valuable sort of

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Weber And Foucault

    1440 Words  | 6 Pages

    This study will discuss the rationalization of the body as it was depicted in the works of Max Weber and Michel Foucault. Both of them have widely discussed the issue from different perspectives. This paper will attempt to bring out the points on which the two thinkers would agree or disagree in their opinions regarding the rationalization of the body. In this paper I will argue that both Weber and Foucault had some common ideas as they tried to deal with rationalization of the body and the individuation of the body, even though both appear to be in quite different points.

    Read More

  • Pascal's Waager Rhetorical Analysis

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    Argument Against the Argument of Pascal’s Wager In Pascal’s Wager, Pascal pioneered new thoughts and opinions amongst his peers in probability theories by attempting to justify that believing in God is advantageous to one’s personal interest. In this paper, I will argue that Pascal’s argument rationalizing why one should believe in God fails and I will suggest that even if one was to accept Pascal’s wager theory, this will not be a suffice resolution to reap the rewards that God has promised to Christian believers like myself who has chosen to believe in God due to my early childhood teachings, familial and inherited beliefs. Pascal offers a logical reason for believing in God: just as the hypothesis that God's existence is improbable, the

    Read More

  • Lara Buchak's Can It Be Rational To Have Faith

    1347 Words  | 6 Pages

    In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

    Read More

  • Descartes And Paley's Argument Analysis

    925 Words  | 4 Pages

    Descartes, and Paley suggest that we can know God and that he is within our understanding. Throughout the readings they describe and argue how we can now the existence of God and the attributes that are associated with him. However David Hume would refute these claims saying through his dialogues more specifically through a character named Philo that we cannot know the attributes or even for that matter the existence. During this paper I will analyze Descartes and Paley’s arguments in comparison with David Hume’s arguments that we cannot know these things. In Paley’s argument he says that if we saw a rock lying on the ground and someone said that rock had always been there that is conceivable, whereas if a watch were lying on the ground that answer would no longer be acceptable.

    Read More

  • Imagine There's No Heaven By Salman Rushdie

    805 Words  | 4 Pages

    A common questioning of a higher power beyond the physical realm lingers in society: Who and what is God?. However, many of these theological questions cannot be answered until we, of course, die. Due to human’s innate curiosity to understand the forces beyond their own, especially in terms of religion, humans find their own reasons to believe in God in the process of discovery. Religion is a sense of belief and worship to praise a higher power (God), and it provides a guide for human beings to have the opportunity to come together and live as one image of God’s children. “Imagine There’s No Heaven” is an article in which Salman Rushdie, the author, presents an atheistic view where religion is pointless, and a higher being is non-existent.

    Read More

  • Roland And Beowulf Comparison

    989 Words  | 4 Pages

    The perfect nature of Roland’s fealty to his God and his absolute faith in

    Read More

  • Pascal's Wager Argument Analysis

    1127 Words  | 5 Pages

    From Pascal’s perspective, the only right choice to make is “wager then, without hesitation, that He does exist” (Pascal). Although Pascal argues that believing in God is the most reasonable decision, there are objections against his argument. The “different practices” objection and the “utility of salvation cannot be infinite” objection will be analyzed according to Pascal’s Wager. Utter repetition of religious acts does not give an individual rational justification to believe in God. Pascal starts by mentioning that God's existence or nonexistence cannot be determined with reason; it cannot be proven, but a individual must “convince [himself], not by piling up proofs of God, but by subduing [his] passions” to believe in God (Pascal).

    Read More

  • Boethius Boethius Free Will

    1532 Words  | 7 Pages

    In Book Five of his text Consolation of Philosophy Boethius addresses divine foreknowledge in a conversation with Lady Philosophy. Boethius presents similar problems as outlined in Augustine’s text, where divine foreknowledge and human will seem to contradict one another. Boethius points out that divine foreknowledge also undermines the significance of prayer, punishment and reward because if all actions are predetermined then humans cannot be responsible for their actions, and their prayer are essential useless. To overcome this problem Boethius identifies different types of knowledge and how they apply to humans and the divine. To begin, Boethius discusses four different types of knowledge; sense, imagination, reason and intelligence.

    Read More

  • Existence Of God Analysis

    1027 Words  | 5 Pages

    Title: Critical evaluation of existence of god Name: Lokesh Singh Roll No. : 13110054 Word Count: 1010  Critical evaluation of existence of god There are many theories and explanations on the concept of god. God is a word which has different meanings for different persons, for example, for an atheist god is just an idea or concept which is evolved by time. But for others this is far greater than that. Many philosophers thought about the definition of god. St. Anselm is the one of the great philosopher who clarified the definition of god and gave an argument about existence of god.

    Read More

  • Argument For Life Of Pi

    729 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the movie, Life of Pi, the main character Pi Patel makes convincing arguments for the existence of God through both natural religion and revealed religion. His argument is that God exists because that is the better story. The plot of the movie is Pi telling an author his life story, including his religious experiences before, and after the shipwreck. In this essay, I will argue that Pi makes a stronger argument for the existence of God through natural religion.

    Read More

More about Blaise Pascal The Nature Of God Analysis

Open Document