Bob Knowlton Case Study Summary

1535 Words7 Pages

BOB KNOWLTON WRITTEN CASE ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
The key person in this case, Bob Knowlton is shown to be a successful project head for the photon Unit in a Lab. He was doing well with his work with his senior, Jerrold, until a new member, named Fester, joined his office. It is shown that Fester turned out to be more capable than Knowlton and hence, he quickly overshadowed the team. The change that Fester brought to the team made Knowlton neglected and also distanced the team from each other. It is seen that at the end, Knowlton left his job for a new one and Fester left the project, which Knowlton was heading, to become a project head of another project of the air force.
This case is shown to demonstrate the power of group thinking. …show more content…

Bob Knowlton is shown to be a person with low on self-esteem, insincere and untruthful towards himself, but with good leadership skill. Also, it is seen that Knowlton himself felt threatened by his own team member, Fester, as he thought that he could lose his power as the team leader due to him. Also, Jerrold didn 't take Knowlton 's feelings into a consideration because he made decisions without even discussing with him and others.
Fester was actually going too strong about his new approach on others ' work without even asking permission from Jerrold or discussing it with other team members. On the other hand, Fester is shown to be insensitive, very straight forward and possessed an individualistic approach apart from being intelligent. The main problem arose due to Doctor Jerrold who is seen to be as not an observer and an ignorant …show more content…

The theory comes into play only if the organization can be rationally designed. The scientific Management theory, was discovered by a professor called Douglas Mcgregor. The alternative term for the scientific management theory, is called ‘Theory X’. Therefore, the organization that Bob Knowlton works for is an organization can be classified under Theory X of Mcgregor’s findings. The organization is not heavily based on bureaucracy, as interaction is encouraged among everyone, and not simply from a ‘top-to-bottom’ style. The organization takes a cultural approach to the virtues of innovation and perseverance in finding success. The organization also shows traits of participative management, because as stated earlier, secretaries are called into meetings as well. Overall, organizational characteristics can be described as team

Open Document