BOB KNOWLTON WRITTEN CASE ANALYSIS
Executive Summary
The key person in this case, Bob Knowlton is shown to be a successful project head for the photon Unit in a Lab. He was doing well with his work with his senior, Jerrold, until a new member, named Fester, joined his office. It is shown that Fester turned out to be more capable than Knowlton and hence, he quickly overshadowed the team. The change that Fester brought to the team made Knowlton neglected and also distanced the team from each other. It is seen that at the end, Knowlton left his job for a new one and Fester left the project, which Knowlton was heading, to become a project head of another project of the air force.
This case is shown to demonstrate the power of group thinking.
…show more content…
Bob Knowlton is shown to be a person with low on self-esteem, insincere and untruthful towards himself, but with good leadership skill. Also, it is seen that Knowlton himself felt threatened by his own team member, Fester, as he thought that he could lose his power as the team leader due to him. Also, Jerrold didn 't take Knowlton 's feelings into a consideration because he made decisions without even discussing with him and others.
Fester was actually going too strong about his new approach on others ' work without even asking permission from Jerrold or discussing it with other team members. On the other hand, Fester is shown to be insensitive, very straight forward and possessed an individualistic approach apart from being intelligent. The main problem arose due to Doctor Jerrold who is seen to be as not an observer and an ignorant
…show more content…
The theory comes into play only if the organization can be rationally designed. The scientific Management theory, was discovered by a professor called Douglas Mcgregor. The alternative term for the scientific management theory, is called ‘Theory X’. Therefore, the organization that Bob Knowlton works for is an organization can be classified under Theory X of Mcgregor’s findings. The organization is not heavily based on bureaucracy, as interaction is encouraged among everyone, and not simply from a ‘top-to-bottom’ style. The organization takes a cultural approach to the virtues of innovation and perseverance in finding success. The organization also shows traits of participative management, because as stated earlier, secretaries are called into meetings as well. Overall, organizational characteristics can be described as team
Trevor Jones Trevor will be charged with manslaughter of the accidental killing of his friend with an illegal gun . Trevor will be sentenced for 90 days of jail time rehabilitating him to rethink his bad choices . Sentenced with custody and supervision for three years to also help his drug and alcohol problems . After his jail time he will have two years of meeting with his probation officer twice a week making sure Trevor is staying clean and making good decisions.
Frederick W. Taylor’s book, “The Principles of Scientific Management,” is a book where he described how the company could be more efficient by managing time, breaking tasks down into small parts, and using standardized tools. They wanted either a council-manager system or a commission plan which means a city’s government would be divided into several departments under the control of an expert commissioner. They also said that if a board of commissioner or a city manager that has the knowledge in city
Contents Terms of Reference 2 Procedure 2 Findings 3 Current Structure 3 New Structure 4 Employee Relationships 4 Instructing Staff 5 Contingency Variables 5 Conclusion 6 Recommendations 6 References 7 Appendix A 8 Terms of Reference I am a HNC business student. I am writing this report as part of my course. This assessment covers outcome 4 of the Managing People and Organizations' class.
ASSIGNMENT#1 Case Study: Stone Finch, Inc. Assessment of Jim Billings’ performance as president of Stone Finch: Jim Billings’ energy, capacity to take risks, build a culture of experimentation and make a team of falcons made him appropriate for the position of President of Stone Finch. His growth and success was quick and remarkable as he moved rapidly from the research group to corporate planning to plant management. He was recognized as high-potential leader throughout the company and he was given responsibility to head R&D and invest capital in it. Due to Billings’ capabilities Richard Stone decided to acquire Goldfinch.
One Example of groupthink I read about is the "escalation of the Vietnam War”, 1. Summarize what happened (explain the event in your own words). In August 1964, two U.S. destroyers stationed in the Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam radioed that North Vietnamese forces had fired them upon.
Tuckman development Tuckman’s development show how groups can be developed into real teams, from given the right sort of support. Tuckman identifies four stages. Forming – number of individuals come together. They are a loose collection with not clear purpose. Storming – the group begins of ideas but there is as yet little structure to the group and no plans to the group forward.
The newly appointed CEO named Kathryn states that “trust is the foundation of real teamwork.” The company fails to understand that a lack of communication among fellow team members is a direct cause to the company not being successful. Not being able to be vulnerable among fellow team members is problematic. In order to be successful in a business there needs to be an understanding that team members can push you in order to reap the benefits of a more balanced team. As a result, invulnerability among team members leads to an artificial unity among the group.
There are many ways in which group dynamics resonate in this film. Group work can foster connections and provide an opportunity /for group members to feel bonded. The Titans football team is a task group; the ultimate role of the group is to have the players come together as one unit. However, there are critical group dynamics that threaten the team’s ability to function properly.
Besides that, the role of Matt’s team was not clearly understood and the team members were unsure if their work had an impact on the organisation. This case will analyse how Google focused on building the perfect team. The company’s top executives long believed that building the best teams meant combining the best people. Hence, Google embarked on Project Aristotle to study hundreds of Google’s teams and figure out why some stumbled
When women were given opportunity to participate in the labour market they were still given low wages then man, feminism movement was associated with seeking equal human right and opportunities for women in economic activities. Organizations have now became flexibly people from different races are allowed to exercise their cultures in the work place for example Friday Muslims go to prayer at a certain time and organizations respect that,this is a reflection flexibility. Organizational culture plays a very important role in intergrating employees.the aim of strong cooperate culture is to form strong identification and loyalty within the man organizations objectives and values.the use of culture as management strategy . Corporate culture was put on agenda .according to Thompson & McHugh (2004) “This can be defined as a way in which management mobilize combinations of values, language, rituals and myths and is seen as the key factor in unlocking the commitment and enthusiasm of employees”.
Max Weber embellished the scientific management theory with his bureaucratic management theory largely focused on dividing organizations into hierarchies, establishing strong lines of authority and control. Weber suggests that organizations develop standard
According to Mary Parker Follet (1941), management is the process of “getting things done through people”. (Khan A. Imaad,2008). Over the course of the years many theories and perspectives have been created as a conclusive result of many research studies. Two such approaches are the theory of ‘Scientific Management’ and the ‘Human Relations’ approach. Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management is popularly known as the first theory in management history (Stoner, Edward, Gilbert, 2003).
1. Define and distinguish scientific management and bureaucratic management. Theoretical models are used to identify the management of different organizations and how they are structured. The early classical school entailed the bureaucratic and scientific management models of management. Both of these models focuses on the improvement of the managerial effectiveness by providing tools and suggesting organizational structures.
`For the purpose of this assignment I have chosen to compare and contrast the contribution of Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915) and Henri Fayol (1841-1925) to the field of management. I will outline the similarities and differences between Taylor and Fayol and then conclude and elaborate on how these two theorists’ work influenced the world of management both in the past and at the present moment. Frederick Winslow Taylor born in focused his theories heavily on the scientific method, finding the ‘one best way’ to manage a firm and its personnel, (Kanigel 1999). Taylor focused on the operative level, he believed that the application of scientific methods from the bottom of the industrial hierarchy upwards was the key to success. Taylor
Organizational culture differs from a company to another, depending on the nature of work. Frequently, a remarkable diverse combination of qualities and standards, administer the cultural environment of an organization. A system of common meaning held by associates that differentiates the organization from other organizations is what we mean by organizational culture. In today 's quickly changing business atmosphere, the cultural make-up of an organization perform a decisive role the achievements of the organization to accomplish its vital targets. In this essay, the reader will be able to recognize the organizational culture of Etihad Airways, which is one of the biggest well-known airways in the airline industry.