Why Fight? In the year 1975 a book called The Killer Angels was written by Michael Shaara. This historical novel was about the Civil War and focuses on the Battle of Gettysberg. Some may not know but the soldiers and generals on the Confederate and Union sides were not always fighting to abolish or keep slavery. The characters in this novel gave an excellent insight on what they believed the war was about and why they were fighting against each other. One of the main characters, General Robert E. Lee, had great influence on the soldiers in his army. This man was very honorable and respected among all people. General Robert E. Lee, also referred to as Lee, was fighting with the Confederate army. Lee was very religious and to him …show more content…
The General thought that slavery was immoral. He was fighting for his home state Virginia. Lee was a loyal person and did not want to fight against his state even though he did not support everything the Confederate army was fighting for. He swore to defend his ground, Lee was talking about the south, so he invades the North and he knew as napoleon knew that a defensive war leads to defeat. General Lee’s second in command was a man called James Longstreet. Although Longstreet did focus on the cause of the Civil War, slavery, he was a “professional” and a strong soldier. He was motivated to fight with the south because at first he believed that the Confederate Army was going to win. That is why he was fighting, to win. Another man named Joshua Chamberlain was a Union Colonel. He was a college professor and an excellent soldier. Chamberlain is more educated and thoughtful that the ordinary soldier. He respects the Confederates but he was willing to fight them. The Colonel was morals and wondered how the Confederates could treat a human being the way they were treating the slaves. Joshua was fighting to save the men and women who were slaves. He was a warrior at heart. Chamberlain found that there was …show more content…
He believed those men had souls and should be given more value than a “dead dog”. That is why he was fighting for the Union in the Civil War. He wanted to prove that the slaves had rights as well and to prove to everyone that he was a better man than many others. Buster did not discriminate against people who are not like him. Whether if they were not the same race or from the same country the man would treat him as he wanted to be treated. Kilran believed that what matters most is justice. Unlike Joshua and Kilrain, a man named Arthur Freemantle supported the Confederates. Arthur was a part of the British government and was sent to observe to see if Britain should support the Confederates as well. Freemantle could tell that the Civil War was based around slavery but he also noticed how gentlemanly and chivalrous. The reason why he, just like many other British, supported the fight was because in the south there were many cotton fields. In Britain they produced a lot of things with cotton. That is the big reason why Arthur supported and fought for the Confederate Army even though Britain abolished slavery. During the Civil War there were many common soldiers who were fighting with
Sally Wang Professor Nash History 1301 13 October 2014 Concept of War Michael Shaara’s The Killer Angels recounts the Battle of Gettysburg through the eyes of key leaders from both the north and the south. Shaara provides insight into the thoughts and decisions that were made that would inevitably determine the outcome of the bloodiest battle of the Civil War. The northern concept of war that they were fighting for the sake of freedom and to restore the union by taking in prisoners and preserving he high grounds at Gettysburg helped them force the Confederates to retreat.
Angels on the Battlefield In the Battle of Gettysburg that took place on July 1, 1863, and ended on July 3, many casualties and injuries resulted from the fighting between those few days, leading to the victory of the Union Army. It is roughly estimated that 620,000 men lost their lives fighting, many for liberty and freedom, others for new opportunities. The Civil War was considered the deadliest and bloodiest battle. Medicine has come a long way now, in comparison to the 19th century, although many lives were lost on the way.
These days could very well have been the absolute turning point of the Civil War. At the start, the brilliant General Lee, one of the most adored and influential men of the south, led the confederate army into Pennsylvania in hopes to win victory over the Union Army by luring the north into battle. The next character. Chamberlain, who happens to be the main Union voice of the novel, led the twentieth Maine, and consequently as a grand reward due to heroic actions received the congressional medal of honor. Chamberlain is both depicted as a soldier and professor.
Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain was a very important soldier in the Civil War, and although Chamberlain was a citizen turned soldier rather than a high-ranking officer, he was still able to help lead the Union Army to victory. In the book Killer Angels, written by Michael Shaara, the author provides the reader with perspective from the Union side of the long Civil War through Chamberlain. He reveals Chamberlain’s character through not only direct characterization but also through his decisions, words and actions. He’s a complex character with many faces. The reader gets to know him as an intelligent teacher, a courageous soldier, a decisive leader, a devoted brother and friend.
Even though soldiers wanted to win the war for their side so badly, they wanted to see their enemy suffer just as badly, but possibly even more. A quote McPherson included from a soldier’s journal on page 153 reads, “’[We] will have an eye for eye and toth for toth…if I live, I will be revenged. Yes I will draw their blood and mutilate their dead bodies and help send their souls to hell.’” Even though there are many motives for why men fought in the Civil War, revenge was a shared motive for both sides that pushed men to their limits during the Civil War. Through McPherson’s use of soldiers’ diaries and letters, it is clear that revenge was an irrefutable motive for soldiers to fight and continue to fight until the
The Civil War was fought by some of the most tactical minds the United States at that time. One such man was the Confederate general Robert E. Lee. Mr. Lee is arguably one of the most cunning leaders to have ever fought with or against the United States. Robert E. Lee was given limited men, limited supplies, and limited equipment to wage war against the Union (a military superpower at the time) and was able to drag the war out much longer than it ever should’ve lasted. Lee’s home life and childhood beginnings are what shaped him into the military mastermind he quickly became.
Lee’s second in command after the death of Lee’s most important general--“Stonewall” Jackson, rises up to the challenge of commanding a large portion of the Confederate Army. Longstreet, who I believe was a man ahead of his time, knew the fast changing style of warfare had to parallel that of the booming changes in technology. General Longstreet is depicted by Shaara, as a full-bearded, intelligent man who was very stubborn and sympathetic, but had an immense respect for his commanding officer, General Lee. With the heavy burden of sending men to their deaths, Longstreet wanted to take upon a defensive strategy to the battle. General Lee who had multiple aggressive, offensive victories before Gettysburg deferred Longstreet’s tactics and continued to press forward.
The United States Civil War is possible one of the most meaningful, bloodstained and controversial war fought in American history. Northern Americans against Southern Americans fought against one another for a variety of motives. These motives aroused from a wide range of ideologies that stirred around the states. In James M. McPherson’s What they fought for: 1861-1865, he analyzes the Union and Confederate soldier’s morale and ideological components through the letters they wrote to love ones while at war. While, John WhiteClay Chambers and G. Kurt Piehler depict Civil War soldiers through their letters detailing the agonizing battles of war in Major Problems in American Military History.
This essay is about the Leaders of the Civil War. Somebody was angry at Lincoln for not ending slavery sooner. Lincoln was happy when he freed them.
I selected the book, What this Cruel War Was Over by Chandra Manning because I have always been fascinated by the Civil War. The Civil War was a gruesome war fought in the United States between the North and the South over the liberation of slaves. I chose this book because I have always been enthralled by the idea of a patriot serving his country and risking his life to protect his nation. For this reason, I selected this book to learn of the horrific struggles faced during the time our nation fought over slavery. This is Chandra Manning’s first book.
The Civil War was a time of great change and strife for America. The Union was making an effort to stomp out the last of the rebellion the Confederates had created. In one of the first major battles of the Civil War, the Battle of Chancellorsville, a surprising outcome occurred and allowed for a change in the morale of the Confederates. Major General Joseph Hooker of the Union and General Robert E. Lee of the Confederates were both fighting to gain initiative and morale for their soldiers. The leader of the Confederates; General Robert E. Lee, fought for rights for the Southern States.
The Battle of Gettysburg was a three day fight in which an estimate of 51,000 soldiers were killed in total, but besides all of the casualties, what else makes this battle special? The Battle of Gettysburg was a huge factor in the abolishment of slavery. It is one of the most important battles because it created new war strategies and was the turning point in the Civil War, which led to the Gettysburg Address. The Confederate general, Robert E. Lee, was very confident because of his army utmost victory.
Merriam-Webster defines loyalty as, "…faithfulness to something to which one is bound by pledge or duty…" One could argue that loyalty has a conflicting component, because when humans make decisions there will be a driving force to what one is "bound" to do. Part of that driving force is how people value loyalty, hard work, morality, etc. Loyalty is a prevalent quality in the human experience because of the decisions of where we place our loyalties; but why is there such conflict in which one’s loyalty should be towards? Humans often encounter conflicting decisions in their experience and it is the idea of loyalty in which many of these decisions clash with one another. Research on loyalty is not a new topic.
Bold. Honest. Hardworking. These are some characteristics of Captain Robert Gould Shaw, leader of the 54th Infantry of Massachusetts. Shaw was born into a lazy family, but it took him some courage to fight his way to being a good, healthy leader.
In chapter one of What They Fought For, I learned about the letters and diaries of the Confederate soldiers. The themes of the letters were home-sickness, lack of peace, and the defense of home against their invading enemy. The thought of soldiers fighting for their homes and being threatened by invaders, made them stronger when facing adversity. Many men expressed that they would rather die fighting for a cause, than dying without trying and this commitment showed patriotism. Throughout the letters, soldiers claimed their reason for fighting, was for the principles of Constitutional liberty and self-government.