Book Thief And Fahrenheit 451: A Comparative Analysis

The use of the power of words on society helps determine why the message is the literary value through the distraction of words during a time of war. Literacy helped distract Liesel and her fellow neighbors from the bombs going on right outside the bomb shelter. The literary elements add emphasis on the novel by showing hidden symbols and can help determine the importance of the main characters in the book. The narrator of Death helped discuss the setting of the novel and also helped evaluate the main character of Liesel as she continued to steal books. The Book Thief will remain a book ran by the importance of reading and

Another way Zusak presents the theme, books can be a person’s saving grace, is when Liesel was writing her life in a journal Max gave her. She was checking over her journal during a bomb raid in the basement and survived. According to the novel, “She survived because she was sitting in a basement reading through the story of her life, checking for mistakes,”(pg.498)Zusak. This shows that a book can be a person’s saving grace because if Liesel never would have stayed in the basement to check her journal she never would have lived. “The Book Thief” is not just about how Liesel surviving during WWII and how everyone eventually dies.

Sometimes people might not actually understand how censorship affects them first hand. Books for example are one of those things that are being affected by this, Books are such a pivotal and fundamental source to the human mind because not only do they enable analytical thinking but they also evoke creativity, emotion, improve vocabulary, memory, writing skills etc. In the story, Bradbury couldn’t stress the importance of books enough, though books were illegal and houses with books were burned to the ground by the firefighters, the protagonist of the novel Guy Montag even questioned the power that a book evokes by saying, “There must be something in books, something we can’t imagine, to make a woman stay in a burning house; there must be something there. You don’t stay for nothing.” I feel like Bradbury is trying to emphasize the importance of literature by basically saying that the women rather burn to death knowledgeable and open minded than incompetent and

Language is powerful, and can even mean the difference between life and death. This proves to be true in Tobias Wolff’s short story “Bullet in the Brain,” in which he makes a point about criticism and language. The main character is Anders. His profession as a book critic is essential to the story because he deals with language every day. He even ridicules bank robbers who point a gun at him because their language is stereotypical.

Various methods of brainwashing distract individuals from the oppressive nature of authoritative figures, similar to communist and fascist establishments prevalent within Eastern Europe. In addition, administering fear in the minds of citizens induces increased loyalty and trust for oppressive governments, which societies of Orwell’s time epitomized through mass murder. The destruction of the individual, along with the concepts of free thinking, creativity, and emotion, ultimately occur as a result of the absolute power held over citizens, which Orwell aspired to avoid in writing 1984. The impact of Orwell’s novel still resonates with readers presently, as the future remains uncertain and the society extensively detailed in 1984 mirrors aspects of one’s life today. Perhaps such an abhorrent anti-utopia did not exist in the year 1984, but the possibility of ultimate totalitarianism never ceases to

Fahrenheit 451 Do books really harm the world or does the government dislike the idea of society turning knowledge into power? Montag was a heroic character, he did what he thought was best, despite what the laws said. Montag went against the law and sought knowledge. Despite his flaws, Montag can be considered a heroic figure.

No matter the circumstance, one should always analyze the good in the current situation. The same relates to the novel, The Book Thief. The author, Markus Zusak, does a remarkable job in showcasing how the characters made the best of the worst. Liesel’s interest in reading books has been of great benefit to her and even in some cases, others. Rosa Hubermann was initially portrayed as a character who is always grumpy and rude to Liesel.

Sebastian Mejia Mrs. Porter English 2 Pre-AP/GT – 5th Period 17 September 2015 Part 1 English 2 Pre-AP/GT Summer Reading Assessment – The Book Thief by Markus Zusak 5. Hans gains Liesel’s trust through patience and understanding. Whenever she would cry or wake up from a nightmare, he would be there for her and protect her. He would say “Shhh, I’m here, it’s alright” to console her and let her know that he won’t leave her. (Zusak 36)

Rainsford finds out he hunts humans and thinks the general is crazy. For example, Richard uses the general as an friend and as a enemy. He goes on to make the general attack Rainsford. Richard Connell uses levels of suspense more effectively than Edgar Allan Poe because of the setting. The crazy people on the island and the hunt at the end of the story.

Montag is labeled a fugitive after breaking several other laws and each step he takes is now an attempt to outrun the cops. He barely evades the media’s plan for his capture when they ask those watching his chase on tv to unify together and catch him (132). Montag executes a narrow escape with the help of Faber and eventually the scholars. Montag learns that the best place he can be is with the scholars, a group of men deemed outcasts because of their love for literature (143). When the city goes up in flames after a bomb is dropped Montag describes the ashy seen.

This book is great description and example of how things are set up and going now a days. Our society focuses too much on making things fair and equal and not allowing people to be them own selves. Burning books takes away people 's right, their happiness, and knowledge. Ray Bradbury does a really good job of relating things from that day in time to now. Even though he doesn 't come right out and say it we see stories in the novel that easily relate to now.

Joseph Brodsky once said, “There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them.” In an interview concerning his science fiction novel, Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury echoed these words because his novel displays such a crime. Although Fahrenheit 451 classifies as fiction, the book points out several problems that now take on the body of reality. Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 exhibits how technology possesses the capability of affecting people negatively through the characters’ actions and the story’s made-up creations.

Fahrenheit 451 and Tomorrow, when the war began in the past have been challenged because of their large amount of profanity and violence in each book and the ideas they bring with them such as the world being a technology based focused world. In Fahrenheit 451 it brings a whole different meaning to books and what they mean and how the world is evolving. Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury should be banned from high schools. T.v was a big part of this society’s life one day Montag even asks his wife a question about the T.v and the love it shows “Millie does the white clown love you, love you very much, love you with all their heart and soul Millie?” The society was so wrapped up in technology and tv and anything electronic that they considered

When one hears about "banned books" you immediately assume there is a list filled with scandalous and provocative books. You think of the book equivalent of R rated movies. Imagine my surprise when the children 's book To Kill a Mockingbird is on the list. This classic teaches many different lessons, so it 's hard to believe that it is banned for things like race relations and rape. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee most often gets challenged on account of the discussion and issue of rape and profanity.

My ardour for Literature grew when I read Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Both novels are similar and revolve around self-discovery. As a reader, it makes me feel like outlaw reading novels about knowledge and reading being a crime. In Huxley 's Brave New World, those who accept the new world lose their humanity. Bradbury shows how the lack of books can give the government too much power.