MIS Book Council Midtown International School should not create a book advisory council. Censoring books can create a bad vibe that can lead to drugs and pornography. Press is also being limited about serious topics that could save lives. The book advisory council would counteract the constitutions first amendment. Finally if you don 't tell the kids what is happening in the bad things somewhere in the world then they will not understand right from wrong.
This is the exact fear that the American people have regarding the constitution. In fact he explains to the people that without the constitution in play the very freedom they are enjoying due to their previous hard fight will be lost. He says that the only way to keep the branches of government separated to prevent one that is too powerful is to have a binding document such as the constitution. As
Would you rather read a book of your choice or read a book that has been banned.”Often challenges are motivated by a desire to protect children from “inappropriate” sexual content or “offensive” language. The following were the top three reasons cited for challenging materials as reported to the Office of Intellectual Freedom: content was considered to be sexually explicit, contained offensive language, and the materials were unsuited to any age group.” Banned books give people a sense of curiosity and excitement, which is why more and more people want to read banned books; to see what the hype was about. The first book ever to be banned was New English Canaan by Thomas Morton in 1637. “It was banned for theological and historical reasons
One of the major principles of the United States government has always been the freedom of speech given to its citizens, but what really comes with this freedom? Does this founding principle make it socially acceptable to create uncomfortable environments and use words to injure others? I think this right has limitations anywhere you go. Countries like Israel are making the word Nazi outlawed. And this isn’t because they’re trying to limit and control freedom of speech but rather because of its symbolic meaning in history.
The First Amendment states many of the freedoms a US citizen posses, banning/censorship of books however has violated this idea of freedom. Some authors dislike the idea of censorship of books, such as Ellen Hopkins. Hopkins is a successful writer who wrote a bestselling book called, Crank. She also wrote the poem Manifesto which was adopted as the official manifesto of the American Library Association banned books week back in 2009. Crank was a book that was banned and censored, which Hopkins disliked.
Who should be protected by the bill of Rights? The Bill of Rights is to protect U.S. citizens from the misuse of power that may be committed by the government in different areas. It clearly restrict the three branches of government laid out in the Constitution. In The Bill of Rights, Reprinted from New York University Law Review, Hugo Black states that “The bill of rights protects people by clearly stating what government can’t do by describing ‘the procedures that government must follow when bringing its powers to bear against any person with a view to depriving him of his life, liberty, or property (Black 1960).’” The first 10 amendment either says what the government cannot do or limits its powers by providing undeniable procedures that it must
The Klondike gold rush was a bloody time in our history and some people may be ashamed. I don’t think that new, fresh, innocent readers should be reading books about blood and gore and a violent time in our history. While I believe history is important, I believe it should be discussed in a safe environment where readers don’t have to figure everything out for themselves. I believe we should be moving on from the dark pasts; not glorifying it. The last reason this book should be banned is because, as others have stated, it makes Jack London look like he glorifies animal abuse.
We need to teach every one about this so no one makes this mistake. The government made this law so we can have respect and then the government wants to take this away, this is not acceptable and should never happen. The last reason why banning books is not a good idea is, we have the ability to search books up online and find the book there. One example of this is Audible.com, this website allows anyone to find any book and have the book read it to you. This website is safe and trusted by millions even by the government, so again this makes us think, why do we ban books?
The last reason banning books is a problem around the world is how it isn't hurting anyone unless they read it and it's those that aren't such a big fan of them. Books should not be banned just because a few others don't like them. Around the world it makes so many upset that libraries are doing that. It isn't fair that others can't read what they enjoy without books being banned. It could be a problem if younger children are reading them, and it has sexual talked, cursed words, but, they could do something about it with under age
Book banning is the act of officially or legally removing a book from the shelves and libraries. Then is challenging another word for banning? No, challenging a book is the initial step in the banning process. By challenging a book it brings into question, and evaluated. It is important to realize that all banned books were at one point challenged books; however, not all challenged books become banned.