ERQ: Discuss the use of brain imagining techniques in the BLOA
In the Biological Level of Analysis Psychologists have to understand the structure and functions of parts the human body and how those structures affect our behaviour. In particular they have study the brain and in order to do this they use imaging techniques such as MRIs and PET scans. This technology allows these researchers to study the ‘active brain’. They both have different functions and are used for different situations.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging or MRIs are an example of an imaging technique that allows psychologists to study the structure of the brain. Using both magnetic and radio waves it creates a cross-section image. They can identify changes in the brain structure
…show more content…
The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the hippocampus in spatial memory. The study took 16 healthy, experience black-cab taxi drivers who were all right handed and between the ages of 32 and 62 years. The researchers took MRI scans of their brains and compared these images to the brain scans of 50 non-taxi driver, right handed males who were controls. Comparing the two set of results it was evident that the cab drivers had significantly larger posterior hippocampi than the control. They also had smaller anterior hippocampi to the control. Another discovery made was that there was a link between the Hippocampi’s volume as well as the years of experience as a cab-driver – it showed positively for the posterior and negatively for the anterior hippocampi. This study proved that the posterior hippocampi had a function in our spatial …show more content…
It strived to see if there was a link between brain abnormalities and murderers who had pled guilty ‘by reason of insanity’ (NGRIs). This would prove that certain changes were a cause of violent behaviour. Raine took a sample of 41 of these convicts and conducted PET scans on them. Glucose tracer were used. The psychologists compared the scans of the brains of these murderers to the scans of 41 control subjects who had no criminal record. All of the participants had to follow a simple task during the scan that dictated they press a button when a certain number appeared. The 41 convicts were chosen based on referrals given to Raine based on issues such as brain injury or hyperactivity. He found that these NGRIs had a significantly lower amount of activity in their prefrontal and parietal areas but their occipital ares had higher. The NGRIs and control were equal for the temporal areas. The results of the NGRIs proved that there was an increased risk of violence in
At the time the physician removed parts of his hippocampus as a way to stop his seizures. HM seizures went away, but he could not form any new memories. However, one form of memory left intact in both HM and Leonard is the ability to learn skills. This ability is known as procedural memory, a memory that is shown by performance rather than by conscious recollection (Kalat, 1998), it allows us to learn how to do things such as ride a bike or play an instrument. The areas of the brain outside of the hippocampus are involved in procedural memory, which is why an injury that results in anterograde amnesia doesn't affect procedural memory.
The article “Brain Scans in the Courtroom” written by Andreas Kuersten is about advances in neuroimaging and how they may benefit in a trial of law. Kuerstens’ main objective is to argue whether or not the advancement in neuroimaging (while helping scientists with their understanding of the brain) can bring forth more evidence into the courtroom by using brain scans of the accused. The significance of these scans is that they can be used in helping a jury rule someone insane, thus meaning the defendant was unaware that his or her actions were unjust, or proving that he or she was in a right state of mind during the crime(s). The article provides convincing scientific evidence promoting the use of these scans making it difficult to deny their
Katherine Jaros Dr. Ann Burgess FORS5317.01 4/19/2023 Understanding Andrea Yates: Mental Health and its Relationship to Violent Crime INTRODUCTION Mental health in criminal offenders is a highly complex and controversial issue that plays a critical role in determining how we understand and evaluate violent crimes. A significant number of offenders who commit violent crimes have some form of mental illness or disorder, which drives interest in studying such cases. Furthermore, during the legal process, there are always two sides that approach mental health in criminals and put it in consideration differently as they argue for opposite outcomes in the courtroom. Defense lawyers seek to emphasize the role that the illness or disorder
In refers to class discussion, as a result of the M’Nagthen case, the Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 (IDRA) is only use when the defendant does not understand the nature of the crime committed. Therefore, although neurosis or personality disorders qualify as a mental disease according to the DSM-5; the law has eliminated these types of disorders from being utilized in courts as a form of defense. The law has also excluded the irresistible impulse or inabilities to comply with the rules as a means of defense in the federal
Insanity Defense evaluations The insanity defense evaluations are used to justify the mental capacity of a criminal in a court proceeding that committed murder as a result of their conduct in society. According to Heilburn (2006), “One doctor in an attempt to find a legal analogy called the DSM 3 the statute law of psychiatry.” (pp.65) formally known as the lex loci delicti commissi in legal terms is a diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders ever known. However, there are two different ways in going about providing an evaluation to a criminal with a mental disease.
“Psychopathy, Intelligence and Emotional Responding in a Non-Forensic Sample: An Experimental Investigation.” The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 25.5 (2014): 600–612. PMC. Web. 23 Oct. 2017.
In my analysis of neurocriminological evidence it should be used in the sentencing phase in the courtroom. The article “Brain Overclaim Syndrome” the author examines neuroscience in the criminal justice system focusing in on trials. There have been a number of defenses using Brain Overclaim Syndrome in court case across the United States sparking a quote by Stephen J. Morse “. Caution in overstating and/ or misstating the place of scientific evidence in excusing criminal behavior committed by those who have the general capacity for rationality” (Adler, 2013).
Obsessive use of GPS may result in the shrinking of the hippocampus, studies find. The hippocampus is an area of the brain responsible for spatial ability. Specifically memory, navigation and spatial orientation. These skills are especially important in finding shortcuts and new routes. Shrinking of the hippocampus is often associated with aging, and is one of the first signs of Alzheimer 's disease.
Brianna Burns ENG 1123, Period 3 Mrs. Meeks 15 October 2015 Summary #9 Glazer, Sarah. " Prisoners and Mental Illness." CQ Researcher (13 Mar. 2015): n.pag. 241-64.
Mental illness is commonly used as a criminal defense in the court of law. The insanity defense is preferred for suspects who have mental disorders such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. These disorders impair a human being in emotional aspects like depression, paranoia, and other forms of emotional instability. We hear about the insanity defense on a regular basis in court cases and portrayed in the media and movies. What we don’t hear about as often, however, are people with cognitive impairments in the criminal justice system.
In summary, mental illnesses are induced by a chemical imbalance of the brain; they range from depression to borderline personality disorder to schizophrenia, and without proper treatments, they could result in abnormal behaviors including criminal tendencies, violent outbursts, and sudden mood swings. Mental health is a topic which is often stationed on the back burner. In fact, many mentally ill people are not diagnosed or treated because mental health is not a part of the standard educational system. Police officers are inadequately equipped with the knowledge of how to deal with the mentally ill, and dozens of cases have been in the news of police not knowing how to react to their erratic actions (Times).
behavior, learning and memory of an individual ( 1). While Dr. Noble noted the more affluent children possessed larger hippocampuses than their disadvantaged counterparts (Brain Trust 47), Hanson notes that the lifestyle of less affluent families affect the hippocampus negatively. For instance, maternal separation can negatively impact the hippocampus, I.e. working mother's. The lower the income a household has, the more stress it faces. Outstanding stress can have long-lasting negative effects on the hippocampus (1.).
Radiology is a tool frequently used in medicine. Almost everyone will have an X-ray, ultrasound, MRI, or one of any of the many other imaging techniques at some point. The use and development of various radiologic techniques have reduced the need of exploratory surgeries and given us a better idea of what is going on inside our bodies. Radiology as we know it today was was invented over a century ago by a German physicist and Professor named Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen 1. In 1895 he discovered electromagnetic radiation in in a wavelength range, or the X-Ray.
Basic Premises Two pioneers in the study of criminal behavior have undoubtedly done more than anyone to identify what the criminal’s basic premises are. Doctor Samuel Yochelson, M.D., Ph.D. and Doctor Stanton E. Samenow, Ph.D. (hereinafter often referred to simply as “the Doctors”) spent more than a decade and a half conducting a clinical study into the nature of the criminal personality. What they uncovered is nothing less than a veritable blueprint outlining how criminals generally think. The study began in 1961 when Doctor Yochelson became the director of the Program for the Investigation of Criminal Behavior at St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, a massive federal facility in Washington, D.C. that houses the criminally insane.
Taking FMRI and testifying for oneself will help us identify answers to questions, such as follows: Was the person responsible for his behavior? What was the person's mental state at the time of the act? What are the effects