Yousuf Sajid
ENG4U
Module 2 Activity 8
1. Although they were raised very differently, Bernard Marx and John the Savage are both dissatisfied with the society of the brave new world. What qualities do the characters have in common? How are they different? Compare their strengths and weaknesses.
The novel, “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley is a story set six hundred years in the future. The world shown in the novel emphasizes on social peace and stability in which emotions, love, and real relationships are hardly found. John the savage and Bernard Marx are among the main characters of the novel. Bernard Marx is an Alpha male and is a citizen of the World State. John the Savage, born on the Savage Reservation is the son of the Director and Linda. Bernard Marx and John the Savage are both dissatisfied with the society of the
…show more content…
The purpose of Huxley to put Mustapha Mond in Brave New World is to make the novel more interesting and extra fictional. Since there is no canon in the World State which could handle problems related to the societies, there has to be someone that could do it to ensure the stability of the societies. This is one of the reasons for Huxley to include Mustapha Mond in Brave New World. Besides, if Mustapha Mond doesn’t exist, the thoughts of the society would have been ruined through the publishing of the myriad works related to science which leads to severe mayhem among the societies of the new world. Apart from that, Mustapha Mond is put in Brave New World so that there is someone who can manage and control a small part of the new world to ensure that the society is always safe and happy. If Mustapha Mond doesn’t exist in the novel, it would have sounded a bit too ridiculous because it would make people wonder that how could the world be in such peace and stability with no one ruling over it. Besides, there has to be someone who knows a bit about the old world in order to keep the societies away from the factors that could bring harm to the new
But once Johns true character, rebel, is revealed Bernard is suddenly not with the rebelling. Showing his true characteristics; a
Charles LP. Silet affirms this by stating, “On the return to his own world, the savage in tow, Bernard continues to think antisocial thoughts, ideas which drive Lenina to break with him and to take increasing doses of intellectually and emotionally deadening drugs” (Silet 495). She fails to see past the physical aspects of men and is confused on how to understand a relationship with emotions. Huxley points out, “Unable to escape her conditioning, she fears his attraction to her” (Huxley 55). Lenina is scared of Johns perspective of her and his view is above measures she cannot comprehend.
In the fiction books Brave New World and 1984, authors Aldous Huxley and George Orwell, respectively, write about potential dystopias in the future. Although they both envision eventual dystopias, the juxtaposition of the two novels shows that they are for different reasons. For example, while the society in 1984 is run by fear and punishment, Brave New World is run by false happiness. Oppositions in themes such as sex, technology, and indifference between the book are apparent, and in my opinion, I would rather live in Brave New World due to its more positive approach. Of the many shared themes tackled by both authors, views on sex are among the most differing.
Therefore the reader sees John as extremely virtuous and Lenina as, perhaps, extremely whorish. At the end of the novel John makes the realization that
This is made clear as Bernard showcases the advanced civilization to John and John seems either unimpressed or confused about the whole situation. This is exemplified when John visits both the library and the Television Corporation factory as the savage learns about daily soma rations of the lower castes and the absence of Shakespeare in the World State. (Pg 164-165). As John continues to explore the world around him it is made very clear that he dislikes and is simply a square peg trying to fit into a circular hole, though John isn’t really trying to fit in moreover just blindly following others direction. This becomes clear to John as Bernard begins parading him around at parties as some kind of entertainment and after finally rejecting to go to one of Bernard's party the reader can see how much John is simply a tool that Bernard is using for his own social gain.
It is what I expected from him since fighting for someone is not known of in his society. (pg.182-184). I think that John relates better to Helmholtz than Bernard for the reason that Helmholtz believes himself to be a subversive writer, creating poems that reflect his personal disconnection from the world, he is immediately fascinated by John, since he sees in the Savage something of the self to which he aspires. Furthermore, when they meet Helmholtz reads some of his personal poetry to John, who responsa with selections from Shakespeare.
Bernard Marx is clearly unorthodox because he refuses to become intimate with Lenina without building a relationship and because he does not consume soma as much as the rest of society. John the Savage is born on the Savage Reservation. John is brought to the World State by Bernard Marx and clearly does not fit in. Much like Bernard, John does not believe in the social norms of the World State. He does not want to allow himself to feel a desire towards Lenina and punishes her and himself when he does so: “Strumpet!
As Lenina’s interest to seduce John perseveres, John responds her with lines from the romantic books he read. After his mother’s death, John starts a riot against the state in cooperation with Bernard. The
Huxley's ideas that our society is numbed by things that we love and that everyone is almost happy to be somewhat oppressed is almost too real. It is pretty easy to see and make connections after evaluating our society that we live in. I agree with Neil Postmans assertions claiming that Brave New World is most relevant to our society. One of Postman’s claims that i related to is “people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.” this is expressed in the book by the simple quote “community, identity, stability”(1).
Chapter 17 Bernard says sorry to John for his behavior. John wants to go with Helmholz and Bernard but the Controller says no. The experiment of John the savage in the civilized world must go on. The leaders of this world are so mean and just don't care about
John has sensitive feelings about love on the account of his upbringing in the savage reservation. Both Bernard and John fight against the society's continual efforts to undermine their individuality. All attempts to free themselves failed. Bernard and Helmholtz, bound for exile at the Falkland Islands, and John who commits suicide after experiencing his own “Orgy-Porgy”. The individuals rights may be limited in the modern world, but they must be exercised constantly, or they are
There are many characters in the book Brave New World. One character that significantly stands out from the rest is Bernard Marx. Just like the rest of the citizens in Huxley's book, the process of decanting created Bernard as well. Due to this, he should not be different than anyone else, but somehow his psyche is different from practically all of the other characters/civilians in the novel. Because of the fact that Bernard thinks differently from everyone else, he begins to question the society that he lives in and also starts to say horrific things about himself.
If you manage to pay close attention, then you might notice that not one of the leaders is a women. That is what first leads the readers to come up with the assumption that men and women are not actually viewed as equals in Huxley's Brave New World.
Huxley makes both John and Bernard outcasts. They are both in the extremes. One comes from the Savage reservation and the other is from the high and mighty world state. The world state is a place where "everyone belongs to everyone." , where they use drugs to cure their feelings, and have polygamous relationships.
RATIONALE I wrote a diary about Lenina’s thoughts in the Brave new world society. As a principal character, Lenina represents a model citizen that always follows its policies. But I think that inside herself she has desires and disagreements with it. Bernard´s behavior mentally confuses her, because he was always complaining about the governments ' ideologies and opposing to take soma.