ipl-logo

Bribery In Kant's Categorical Imperative

742 Words3 Pages

Bribery is defined on the dictionary as offering, giving, or receiving of a bribe, which means giving or receiving of something of value in exchange of specific favorable outcome that it may not occur if it weren’t for the bribe. “Bribery law consists of the criminal rules for dealing with people who attempt to buy influence with public officials and other decision-makers.” (Bribery and Corruption Law). The crime of bribery covers a broad scope of wrongful conduct, for instances, bribes of cash, favors, assets, services, or anything else of value, whether delivered presently or in the future. Bribes can occur directly, or indirectly through third parties in order to disguise the transaction. Even the transaction is not completed, or just offering …show more content…

He believed that in the theory of deontology which says that consequences doesn’t matter, what really matter is the motivation, but how can we know which is a moral motivation? That is a very good question, this’s why Kant came up with Categorical Imperative, which are the steps to we can used to make a decision. There are three main principle in CI. First we have the principal of university, which says that if an action is right for others, then it’s right for us. Let’s talk about bribery, is it moral right? Is it moral wrong? That might be a very subjective topic to discuss because there are many arguments that support both. Many people think it’s the right and others think it’s wrong. That’s why the CI have this other principle about “treat humanity as an end, never as a mean”. To simplify this, a way to say this is to treat humanity as rational beings, and not as a thing. Basically says that if we treat someone as a thing/mean you are disrespecting him, and that’s morally wrong. For example, if a person bribes you, and you don’t have any options but to accept the bribe, then you are a human being capable of making your own decisions because someone is threatening causes you aren’t able to make your own independent decision. However, based on Kant’s theory, bribery is morally wrong

Show More
Related

  • Corruption In One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest

    1764 Words  | 8 Pages

    The definition of Corruption (in the context of politics) according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary is “dishonest or illegal behavior, especially by powerful people”. In order to rise into power in the United States, one is elected into power by the people of the

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Lobbying Or Bribery

    904 Words  | 4 Pages

    Bribery on the other hand is basically the same thing except it is giving money with the intention of the person doing what you tell them. Bribery is illegal because it usually involves one person with a lot of money paying a politician in order for them to do as told. In truth bribery and lobbying are not very different. But even one being legal and the other one being illegal they both cause some amount of corruption when it comes to politics. Lobbying the legal substitute for bribery, it has many problems inherently involved with it.

    Read More

  • What Is Kant Approach To Evil

    871 Words  | 4 Pages

    Second, his definition of moral law to which people should adhere, that

    Read More

  • Hotel Rwanda Paul Rusesabagina Ethical Analysis

    993 Words  | 4 Pages

    Was the Captain morally right in ordering the eight men to risk their lives for one man, just to make himself feel better? Was his choice made worse by the fact that he knew these men had been trained to follow orders, even to their own detriment? In my opinion Kant’s theory is once again shown to have a negative impact on people. In Hotel Rwanda it is used to excuse inaction by the U.N troops and in Saving Private Ryan, the soldiers, training to follow the rules of their leaders is used to send them on what is essentially a suicide mission for the sake of one man, who could be dead.

    Read More

  • Comparing Kant And Mill's Categorical Imperative

    668 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who, similar to John Stuart Mill, created a modern ethical theory. Kant and Mill both believed in a bottom up ethics, which claims that human beings are the legislature of moral law. However, the views of these two philosophers were polar opposites. Kant believes that there is a difference between a right action and a moral action. He first illustrates that a moral action proceeds from duty, obligation or moral law.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative

    4425 Words  | 18 Pages

    As a formal principle, the Kantian moral law provides the necessary path to moral action. However, all of the debates on emptiness emerge, around these questions of how the Categorical Imperative could reach the moral conduct, whether one can will a candidate maxim as a universal law without this generating a contra¬diction through CI1, or how moral law commands respect for rational agents as ends in themselves through CI2. There have

    Read More

  • Corruption In Ancient Rome

    740 Words  | 3 Pages

    The forms of corruption include not only public officials’ personal gain behavior but also interest exchange process, such as nepotism, nonfeasance and disposal of public resources. Corruption can be defined as breaking the rules pertaining to a certain office, it can be defined economically, and it can be defined as acting against general interest. A scholar by the

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperatives

    369 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant had a very interesting approach to ethics. Actions are not always carried out as if they were a universal law, the way Kant wanted, because he was a moral absolutist. Kant’s idea of categorical imperatives is not attainable in any society. Everyone has different morals and beliefs, meaning that everyone has a different standard to which they hold themselves; their actions are reflections of their beliefs. The example of lying to a stranger at the door is an extreme example of Kant’s categorical imperative.

    Read More

  • Strengths Of Kant's Deontology

    1787 Words  | 8 Pages

    Kant always emphasized that everyone should be treated freely and equally. He emphasizes that everyone should be treated valuable and not be used to benefit others. He sets a fine line though saying he does not want people not be used at all, but if they are in the situation where they are that they should be treated just like you would want to be treated. What he tried to emphasis on the duty theory is that it is not only about doing the right thing. Immanuel Kant tries very hard to put morality out there on how human beings should be treated and his theory can be seen as absolutely amazing.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative Analysis

    544 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative is a theory of ethics. Essentially Kant gives us his definition of what imperative means, which he defines as something that a person has to do. The categorical imperative is something that a person has to do, regardless of the circumstances surrounding that situation. Kant expands on his ethical theory by creating a new idea called a maxim. What a maxim essentially is, is saying what you want to do, and giving reasons why you want to do it.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative: Formula Of The Universal Law

    1606 Words  | 7 Pages

    Also, there is another important aspect of Kantianism, which is called a categorical imperative. This is the aspect that helps us to constrain our maxims. In accordance to Kant, there are three different formulations of the categorical imperative: formula of the universal law, formula of the end-in-itself, and formula of the kingdom of ends. (White, 2015C, p. 2) The formula of the universal law is telling us about the maxims that can be transferable into a universal law, which means that the action taken out of that particular maxim can be applicable to anyone.

    Read More

  • Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism

    652 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kant believes in the formula of universal law, which is act only on that maxim that at the same time you could will as a universal law. This formula can be applied to any situation; for example, one cannot kill because it cannot be willed as a universal law. He also believes

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Deontology: The Ethics Of Duty

    622 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Categorical Imperative  The Hypothetical Imperative  Autonomy and Heteronomy of will  Kant on the concept of respect  Contemporary Deontologists The concept of the “good will” and Duty

    Read More

  • How Does Corruption Affect Society

    1017 Words  | 5 Pages

    Corruption is a complex social, political and economic phenomenon that affects all countries. In Colin Nye’s classical and most widely used definition, corruption is a “behaviour which deviates from the formal duties of a public role because of private regarding (personal, close family, private clique) pecuniary or status gains” (Nye 1967). In short, corruption is the misuse of public power for private gain. Currently the most common types of corruption are bribery, nepotism, fraud and embezzlement. It is necessary to make a distinction between administrative and political corruption.

    Read More

  • Principle Of Bribery Essay

    809 Words  | 4 Pages

    Bribery According to the Bribery Act 2010, bribery can be prevented by implementing “The Six Principles”. Each Principle is accompanied with guidance on the procedures for the application of each principle. (Ministry of Justice, 2012)

    Read More

More about Bribery In Kant's Categorical Imperative

Open Document