Brooke V. Winn-Dixie Store Case Study
SUMMARY JUDGMENT UPHELD WHEN PLAINTIFF OBSERVED A DANGEROUS CONDITION, BUT FAILED TO STEP AROUND AN EASILY AVOIDABLE OBSTACLE AND FELL.
Brooke v. Winn-Dixie Stores, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D752 (Fla. 1st DCA April 4, 2017):
Plaintiff went to Winn-Dixie to make a purchase and get empty boxes. During his visit he made four trips in and out of the store. During that time, a shipment of beer was being delivered. The beer was being stacked approximately five feet high on a pallet between the entrance and the exit doors. (Clark Fountain, 2017)
On the plaintiff’s third trip exiting the store, he saw the empty pallet, but still tripped and fell over it, suffering injuries as a result. He then sued Winn-Dixie for failing to warn of the dangerous condition
…show more content…
Business owners receive shipments of products everyday which have to be stored somewhere before final placement, and when a customer sees the placement but trips and falls, the invitee has violated his own duty to exercise reasonable care for his own safety. Also, because the pallet was not a foreign transitory substance, the analysis is different. (Clark Fountain, 2017)
Issue(s) – Was the defendant negligent in taking care and maintaining the walkway in order to accommodate a reasonable and safe condition for the use that it is intended?
Rules - Tort Law, Negligence. A land owner has two distinct duties to business invitees: (1) the duty to warn of a latent dangerous condition and (2) the duty to maintain premises in a reasonably safe condition. (Clark Fountain, 2017)
Analysis – It appears that the location of the pallets was clear and obvious. The pallets did not possess a risk that would be inherently dangerous to an individual who is using the walkway. This condition appeared to be common and was known to be innocuous in everyday life that it did not have the ability to impose liability on the land and business owner. The plaintiff breached his own duty to assure his safety by not maintaining his direction of walking which does not pose a liability to the defendant. In this case, the plaintiff has been negligent to care for his own
Case Study: Nestle V. South Carolina
239 Words | 1 PagesThe court granted Nestles request for transfer of the action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. Reason : The court pointed out that the plaintiff resides in South Carolina, her daughters injuries occurred there and her medical treatment was there and continues to be there therefore making South Carolina the appropriate place for the litigation to proceed. A court should not be required to expend resources on cases that have little relationship to the district
The Wrongful Death Of Bianca Barnes: 10 Years Old At A Skating Conducted
1046 Words | 5 PagesDefendants stated that when Bianca fell she had no signs of trauma and she was assisted through the whole process. Defendants claimed that ice was given to her, that they attempted to call her mother, and that she was assisted on the trip home. In response, other witnesses never saw any aid come from Spotlite employees. No one was seen on the bus with Bianca when she was traveling back home after the injury occurred. Evidence fell most favorable to the plaintiff, Spotlite breached its duty of supervision when allowing Bianca to onto the rink with no skates and not being present when the incident occurred.
Case Project 3 Response To Action
834 Words | 4 PagesLisa Hetherington LGST 495 7980 Professor Hansen 17 April 2016 Project 3: Response to Action Introduction This case was brought by the plaintiff, Mr. Jim Jones, who alleges that the Defendants, Grab-n-Go, Inc. (“the store”) and by proxy, its owner, Mr. John Smith, did negligently leave some amount of coffee creamer on the floor near the coffee bar, which he stepped on, slipped and fell, but for causing the injuries he sustained that day. The defendants, through their attorneys, move to DISMISS the counts brought against them pursuant to Md. Rules 2-322(b)(2), Failure to State a Claim. The plaintiff, Mr. Jones, alleges one cause of action: Negligence (Count I), Maintaining Negligent Conditions. He stated in his claim that the store employees failed to clean up a mess of coffee creamer, which was part of their duty of care to him as an invitee on the premises, and upon which he slipped.
Rhalys Case Study
807 Words | 4 PagesThe City asserts that it was entitled to an opportunity to cure the discovery failure before sanctions could be awarded. Dismissal with prejudice is a sanction that should be imposed only in those rare instances where the conduct of a party is so egregious that no other sanction will meet the demands of justice.” The appellees sued the City, seeking damages allegedly suffered by them when Eubanks Creek overflowed ad flooded their
The Case Of Alex Hardy Driving The Reasonable Man-Standard
1271 Words | 6 PagesThe reasonable man-standard is used in law to determine negligence. “A jury generally decides whether a defendant has acted as a reasonable person would have acted. In making this decision, the jury generally considers the defendant’s conduct in light of what the defendant actually knows, has experienced, or has perceived” (“Standards”). In this case, the jury decided that the defendant knew about the problem but failed to act as a reasonable man, causing Hardy’s injury. GM did not intend to purposely cause Hardy harm but the company was held liable for neglecting the door latch recall.
Martin Lewis Case Study
1280 Words | 6 PagesState Bank of Lombard, 125 Ill.2d 203, 215-16, 126 Ill.Dec. 519, 531 N.E.2d 1358 (1988) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314 (1965)), in addressing the duty of care element of negligence by a landowner. The court found no duty of care exists to protect others from criminal activities by third persons unless a “special relationship” exists between the parties. Zeroing in on the special relationship language, the court found that even if a special relationship exists between parties, in Illinois a landowner’s liability extends only to “physical harm” caused by acts of third persons. Marshall, 222 Ill.2d at 437, 305 Ill.Dec. 897, 856 N.E.2d 1048 (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 344 (1965)). The court further distinguishes special relationship as business invitor and invitee.
Turner V Hershey Chocolate Case Analysis
955 Words | 4 PagesCase Analysis Paper / Discussion MBA 623 Name: Patel Mukeshkumar Shamalbhai Paper # Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 (3d Cir. 2006) Word Count: _______ I. Citation: Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 [3d Cir. 2006] II. Issue and Rule: The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim.
Case Study: Burwell V. Hobby
1454 Words | 6 PagesBusiness Law Case Study Essay: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S (2014) Facts: The Green family runs and owns Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and skills chain that has over 500 stores and they have over 13,000 employees. Other facts of the case are that the Green family has been able to organize the business around the values of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company as told by Biblical principles, one of which is the belief that the utilization of contraception is wicked. Also, the facts show that under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), occupation -founded group health care plans must offer certain sorts of preventative care, for example, FDA-accepted contraceptive approaches.
Case Study: Dollar General
760 Words | 4 Pages1. In the broader context (not specific to Dollar General), what is KKR’s investment strategy? What are the challenges KKR will encounter to make its investment in Dollar General successful? How could KKR add value to Dollar General?
Negligence In A Civil Action By Jan Schlichtmann
719 Words | 3 PagesA civil lawsuit is normally filed against those who are negligent in order to obtain monetary compensation for damages. In the movie, the two corporations are found negligent in their actions of disposing of waste into the town of Woburn’s water supply. As a result, Attorney Jan Schlichtmann filed a suit against the two corporations and used geological evidence, experts, and eyewitnesses to prove the involvement of the two corporations. According to the textbook, Elements of negligence are as follows: abiding by standard practice, the duty of care, breaching the duty of care, casual connection, and actual harm. The two corporations were supposed to abide by standard practice, however, by owning plants alongside the contaminated water supply, they both breached their duty to properly dispose of waste.
Diane Maclsaac Hockey Case Analysis
500 Words | 2 PagesAll witnesses for the defence stated that the appellant’s skates did not leave the ice. In regards to skating past the opposing bench, the appellant testified that he only meant that injuries happen in sports, hence why we brought up the tripping incident
Case Study: Laura V. Campers Discount Warehouse
465 Words | 2 PagesCampers Discount Warehouse: The Discount Warehouse duty to act with reasonable care was breached because they cooking stoves where not placed properly, which resulted in it falling on Laura. If the Discount Warehouse were more cautious on how they stack there merchandise Laura would have suffered no harm. Since the Warehouse was negligent, it resulted in Laura having a loss of consortium, meaning physical intimacy, loss of enjoyment of life, wage/income. Also Laura has the costs of medical expenses, living with the disability, and mental distress. Laura v. Hospital: I would advise Laura to sue the hospital for negligence, and damages since she lost her valuable engagement gifts (necklace and ring).
What Was Involved In The Case Of Graham V. Conner
568 Words | 3 PagesIn the Case of Graham V. Conner, Graham was an extreme diabetic. HE was starting to feel some of the onset of his insulin shot so he called one of his friends named Berry and asked him for a ride to the nearest convenience store. Graham was hoping to just go in and buy some orange juice. He has believed that some of the sugar in the orange juice would help balance his sugar levels. After Graham and his friend Berry had arrived at the convenience store, Graham had gotten out of the car and “hastily” went in.
Case Study Of Turner V. Hershey Chocolate USA
1045 Words | 5 PagesName: Patel Mukeshkumar Paper # JANET M. TURNER, Appellant v. HERSHEY CHOCOLATE USA Word Count: _______ I. Citation: Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 [3d Cir. 2006] II. Issue and Rule: The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim. The appellant’s essential accommodation claim went to trial, but court excluded evidence regarding disability.
Case Study: Welge V. Planter's Lifesavers
517 Words | 3 PagesWhile Mrs. Mabee carried the jugs from the front door toward the back of the house, one of the jugs shattered and spilled on her body and on the dining room floor and furniture, causing severe damage. 2 & 3 -The Product was so defective that the product was unreasonably dangerous and cause the plaintiff’s injury. It was evident the product was defective since as soon the jugs were handed over to Mrs. Mabee by the delivery driver, the jugs shattered causing injury instantly. Jeanny
More about Brooke V. Winn-Dixie Store Case Study
Case Study: Nestle V. South Carolina
239 Words | 1 PagesThe Wrongful Death Of Bianca Barnes: 10 Years Old At A Skating Conducted
1046 Words | 5 PagesCase Project 3 Response To Action
834 Words | 4 PagesRhalys Case Study
807 Words | 4 PagesThe Case Of Alex Hardy Driving The Reasonable Man-Standard
1271 Words | 6 PagesMartin Lewis Case Study
1280 Words | 6 PagesTurner V Hershey Chocolate Case Analysis
955 Words | 4 PagesCase Study: Burwell V. Hobby
1454 Words | 6 PagesCase Study: Dollar General
760 Words | 4 PagesNegligence In A Civil Action By Jan Schlichtmann
719 Words | 3 PagesDiane Maclsaac Hockey Case Analysis
500 Words | 2 PagesCase Study: Laura V. Campers Discount Warehouse
465 Words | 2 PagesWhat Was Involved In The Case Of Graham V. Conner
568 Words | 3 PagesCase Study Of Turner V. Hershey Chocolate USA
1045 Words | 5 PagesCase Study: Welge V. Planter's Lifesavers
517 Words | 3 Pages