Brutus And Mark Antony Speech Analysis
Both speeches conveyed by Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the crowd of mourns at the funeral of Julius Caesar. Although, the rhetorical devices in each speech was expressed in different ways in order to sway the opinion of mourns in the crowd. The basic difference between the two speeches is that Brutus’s speech appeals to reason and logic and Antony’s speech appeals to your emotion
For instance, Brutus’s speech uses the devices as a rhetorical question to try to persuade the crowd that he and the conspirators did a good feat by killing Caesar: “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than Caesar were dead, to live all freemen?” (Shakespeare 150). Therefore, he express to the crowd how he cherished Caesar nonetheless killed him since he adores Rome more, which showed the ethos appeals to his character as a Roman, as well as logos for it seems a logical threat to Roman society should be eradicated. Subsequently, he makes an appeal to his own character by portraying his pride for his country; he forces the crowd to feel guilty if anyone opposes him is essential an enemy of Rome.
On the other hand, Mark Antony’s speech tries to convince the crowd to believe that Caesar did not deserve to die and the conspirators are the real antagonist by the use of a rhetorical question. Therefore, Mark Antony used his rhetorical question to contradict Brutus’s statement that they had to kill Caesar because
Rhetorical Analysis Of Mark Antony's Speech
207 Words | 1 PagesMark Antony is trying to win over the people of Rome by his very effective use of rhetoric. In his speech, his overall point is to persuade the Roman citizens that Brutus’s claim of Caesar being ambitious is not true. Antony’s use of rhetorical devices such as a rhetorical question give the people a good message. When he is telling them that Caesar brought many captives to Rome, he asks, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious” (3.2.18). Antony’s rhetorical question was very effective since he is making the people question Brutus’s claim.
Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar
978 Words | 4 PagesAntony states that Brutus killed Caesar after making a deceitful impeachment of ambition; making Brutus not an honorable man. Inspite
Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
949 Words | 4 PagesAntony wants to remind the Romans that he is credible for speaking of Caesar “that love my friend, and that they know full well, that gave me public leave to speak of him” (III.ii.215-216) Antony uses ethos after telling the Romans everything to convince them in being against that conspirators’ that he can speak of Caesar because he was a close friend of Caesar. Antony convinces the Romans to retribute the conspirators’ for what they have done “In every wound of Caesar that should move the stones of Rome to rise and mutiny” (III.ii.225-226) Antony wants revenge and is convincing the Romans to riot by using pathos. Antony wants the Romans to feel sorry about Caesar’s death “here was a Caesar! When comes such another?”
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
833 Words | 4 PagesAntony is refuting Brutus’ argument that Caesar was too ambitious and that is why he needed to be assassinated. He brings up the time when Caesar denied the crown several times and asks the audience, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?”
Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar
671 Words | 3 PagesNow the difference between the use of rhetorical questions in these speeches is that Antony's was used effectively, he worded it in such a way that stirred feelings as well as made them think. Brutus, on the other hand, only appealed to logic and talking to the citizens in such a way that almost offended them. Brutus says “Who is here so Vile that will not love his country?”. This is a rhetorical question that is weak because it is offending people in a way of making them feel bad if they don't love Rome with a burning passion. This isn't effective because the only thing this could do is make the romans feel as if they are being attacked.
Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech
721 Words | 3 PagesRhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.
Rhetorical Appeals In Brutus
755 Words | 4 PagesIn the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.
Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
437 Words | 2 PagesAfter reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech
617 Words | 3 PagesSydney Stone Mrs. Paul English 10A 16 October 2017 Rhetorical Analysis Essay William Shakespeare, a very famous writer, tells the story of Julius Caesar. In his play, Marc Antony delivers a powerful speech that uses many different rhetorical devices, appeals, and different styles of writing. Some of these include repetition, rhetorical questions, pathos, logos, ethos, and diction. These help enhance Marc Antony’s speech by persuading the audience towards considering that Caesar was a good man.
Rhetorical Devices Used In Mark Antony's Speech
373 Words | 2 PagesAntony is trying to find out whether they believe if Brutus had a valid reason to assassinate Caeser. He achieves his goal of making the murder seem unethical by using his convincing argument. Overall, Mark Antony’s speech was helpful in trying to convince the Plebeians. By the end of his speech, the Plebeians believed that the murder of Julius Caesar by the conspirators was an unrightful doing. The conspirators might’ve gotten away with the murder, but will never be seen the same by the
Ethical Appeal In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesIn the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.
Analyzing Brutus's Speech In 'Julius Caesar'
922 Words | 4 PagesBrutus 's speech: Brutus speaks to the people of rome why he killed caesar so they will not turn on him. He talked about how he didnt kill him because he didn 't love him but because it was for the better of rome. He also tells the people of rome that letting caesar become king would mean the government type would change and all the wars and hard work his family had put into the government would go away. He also states, for the welfare of rome that he would die for rome if rome demands his death Rhetorical devices: Brutus used questions, logos, parallelism, and pathos to stir the people of rhome. Question-
Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech
824 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.
Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 PagesMarcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with
The Power Of Language In Julius Caesar
1241 Words | 5 PagesThese statements mixed with examples counteractive to Brutus’ argument create an antithesis that results in the plebeians not only doubting the argument of Brutus but beginning to believe that Caesar’s death was unjust. By restating the statements over and over again by to the point that the true intention of the conspirators is a rhetorical question for the plebeians. Antony’s use of this device not only affects the logos of the people by giving them a rhetorical question as to what is happening, but also affects their ethos by causing them to doubt the credibility of Brutus’ argument. Lastly, Antony begins to finish his speech and win the plebeians over by orating “.O masters, if I were disposed to stir your hearts and minds to mutiny and rage, I should do Brutus wrong, and Cassius wrong— who, you all know, are honorable men” (Shakespeare 3.2.120-123). Antony by turning Brutus and Cassius into villains.
More about Brutus And Mark Antony Speech Analysis
Rhetorical Analysis Of Mark Antony's Speech
207 Words | 1 PagesRhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar
978 Words | 4 PagesAntony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar
949 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
833 Words | 4 PagesUse Of Pathos In Julius Caesar
671 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech
721 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Appeals In Brutus
755 Words | 4 PagesEthos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
437 Words | 2 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech
617 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Devices Used In Mark Antony's Speech
373 Words | 2 PagesEthical Appeal In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesAnalyzing Brutus's Speech In 'Julius Caesar'
922 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech
824 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 PagesThe Power Of Language In Julius Caesar
1241 Words | 5 Pages