Extremism in Buddhism
Since 2011, countries in Southeast Asia are experiencing changes in political, economic and social arenas. But the transition was hampered by animosity between Buddhists and Muslims. Burma (Myanmar) and Sri Lanka witnessed many cases of religious intolerance mainly triggered by Buddhists against other religious minorities, including a large minority of Muslims. Despite the fact that Buddhism is the religion which has ‘nonviolence’ and ‘not to kill’ as their main moral precepts, there were numerous cases when monks marched with mobs and showed their hatred and dislike towards religious minorities, mainly in the name of nationalism. These cases include Korean Buddhist monks who supported their army to defend the country
…show more content…
At the time when the state was concerned with political and socioeconomic problems due to this transition, the problem of religious violence became leading issue in the country. Inter-religious conflicts started to take a center stage since 2012, mainly due to the rise of 969 movement in 2011, and MaBaTha (Association of Protection of Race and Religion) movement in 2014 . The aim of these religious groups ruled by monks is to “protect and promote Buddhist values and traditions in the midst of the country’s transformation and as it opens up to the modern world” . Starting from 1962 until recent reforms military regime in Burma limited the religious freedom for non-Buddhists . Partly because of that, sense of nationalism and religious identity became inseparable, which means that being Burmese encompasses being a Buddhist. These nationalist groups, mentioned above, claim that their culture, practices, identity, values and even existence are threatened by within country and outside country elements . They hold this paranoiac viewpoint and blame Muslim minority as if they were planning to displace …show more content…
He is known for his nationalist and pro-Buddhist rhetoric. He was accused for his hate speeches against Muslims and violence against them. They shape Islam as inimical to Buddhist values, mainly due to their specific attitudes towards women . The extremist Buddhists claim that non-Buddhist tactics such as buying only from the Buddhist shops came from Muslims, and that it shouldn’t be considered as discrimination, but rather supporting business of their people. They state that restricting inter-religious marriages is also not traditional Buddhist way, but if it helps Buddhism it is acceptable . Also, they criticize the violence in Islam, and their implicit aims to take over the country, region, and the world. The 969 lead by Ashin and MaBaTha movements use defense of the sasana, which is a Pali word meaning ‘Buddhism’, to justify their violence against Muslims . There was a historical precedent when Sinhalese king, Dutthagamani, killed Tamil king and said that he was not trying to occupy new territory, but to defend sasana
In the Rwanda genocide and Bosnia, nationalists were exterminating the local relationships. The guards in the prison camps in Bosnia wanted to make sure that Muslims and Serbs would never bond with each other again. Prisoners would fear of becoming recognized because a nationalist recognizing them meant that they would get tortured (Fujii 2015, 4). Guards beat up Serb prisoners because the prisoner had ties with Muslims before or after the war. Nationalist did not only want demolish Muslims and Serbs relationship, but establish a new meaning of being a Serb (Fujii 2015, 8).
He has a negative view on Buddha itself. Another person that felt negative about Buddhism was a Confucian scholar named Han Yu. In Document 4 he says that Buddhism came from the barbarian people. Since the religion has no history of China, he believes that it should not be apart of China.
Buddhism has extensively shaped Australian society, where diverse cultures can practice Buddhist teachings
but he replied that if you wanted you exchanged wives and children for wisdom. It is obvious that there was still doubt in people’s mind about Buddhism. That is why this scholar tries to argue that, he is aware of the benefits and the good Buddhism will bring which is why he’s fighting for it. This is what happened to Muhammad when he started spreading Allah’s message in order to spread Islam. The people did not take the time to listen or pay attention to the message they only focused on one man trying to spread something that was not what they believed in, in this case however many of the people did not listen to
Nationalism is the pride for one’s country, the love that one has for its country and it is the want for the good of all people in the nation. This love is not conditional, it does not depend on race religion or economic standing. When a leader is chosen, when a country is coming out of great national change, this requires a particularly strong leader who only wishes for their countries greatness and success in the future. However, this can quickly turn into ultranationalism, or expose ultranationalistic motives. The two concepts of one’s love for their country have similarities, one is formed from the other, or that each can be provokers of change in either direction in the political spectrum.
As Manela writes, “Nationalism, as an ideology and as a form of political practice, evolved conceptually and historically within an international context, and it cannot be fully understood outside that context” (p.
When people show patriotism and act on it it can end up being considered ultra nationalism. Some people take patriotism to the extreme and when that happens ultra nationalist things end up happening.
Buddhism gained the endorsement of a series of emperor, plus the Buddhist mentality and response to negativity allowed Buddhism to spread in Chinese society. A great examples of how monks would react was when a monk was asked why Buddha was not mentioned in the great Confucian classic and so the monk answered All written works need not necessarily be the words of Confucius. To compare the sages to Buddha would be like comparing deer to a unicorn.. (Doc 4) here you can clearly see the tone of relaxation and understanding that the monk uses to respectfully answer the question of the Confucian scholar with utmost respect, at no moment does the monk feels hate because his faith is being questioned and at no moment does he demonstrate hate in his response toward the scholar. The Buddhist peaceful and humble nature on top of teaching that promised happiness and prosperity made it so Buddhist were not disliked by everybody in China.
Buddhism is a religion that has been under pressure for hundreds of years. Specifically in China, the acceptance of the religion was a hard, long battle that formed demise and refute amongst the society. Emperors, Scholars, and even anonymous Chinese writers voiced their opinions for and against Buddhism. Many controversial arguments are held today. Emperor Wu of the Tang Dynasty (845 C.E.), did not respect Buddhism as a religion.
There are very many religions that exist in the world today. Religion plays such a major role in people’s everyday lives, and it’s not surprising why it is such a major focus in the way choices and decisions are made. Each of the world’s major religions has certain differences that set themselves apart from others and that make them unique. Most religions, however, all follow the same morals and guidelines that are quite similar to each other’s.
In the essay, “ The Role of Religion in Modern Society”, Dalai Lama, The preeminent religious authority in Buddhism reveals the reason behind why religion has been a major source of conflict throughout the history, and how inter-religious harmony is the key to overcoming conflict of the first sort. He goes deeper into the similarities between different religion and identifies the obstacles that obstruct inter-religious harmony by developing ways to overcome them. He believes religion plays a vital role in the modern society by shaping the person's spiritual qualities rather than making him a better religious person than the other. Dalai Lama expounds that religious practice can help a person cope with adversity than those who don't.
The world is a scary place with many terrors; humans are these terrors with the destruction they cause. There are a few great men who changed that. The Dalai Lama once said, “The true hero is the one who conquers his own anger and hatred” (Dalai Lama quotes 2015). Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X were great freedom fighters; although they died in great violence.
Nationalism has too often been dismissed as an irrational creed due to its association with disastrous results over the decades. But undeniably, it is a dominating force in contemporary international politics. It is important to understand nationalism if we want to understand global political developments. Many books have been written on this subject, but David Miller’s On Nationality stands out. This book takes on a distinctive approach to the study of nationalism, rendering it one of a kind in this field.
Even in modern times, Islamisation is still on the rise. Due to the power Islam potentially holds, it is important to understand the relationship between Islam and politics. As Indonesia is home to the largest Muslim population in the world, it would be suitable for use as a key example. In the case of Indonesia, the introduction of Islam can be divided into three phases; from 622 to 1100, as a product of commercial contact with maritime regions of the Indian Ocean through trade that dates back to before the Islamic period; from 1100 to 1500, where the widespread of Islam was focused more on the spiritual belief rather than rituals.
It also became an agent of mental and practical liberation to the oppressed peoples and of economic development to the disadvantaged peoples. “Engaged Buddhism” is defined by the intention of Buddhists of whatever sect to apply the values and teachings of Buddhism, especially compassion and love, to the problems of society in a nonviolent way, and are motivated by concern for others’ welfare, and is served as a channel to express their own Buddhist practices. So, “Engaged Buddhism” is neither a new Buddhist sect nor does it belong to one of the established sects. This engagement is not detached from Buddhist spirituality, but it is a modern phenomenon to express their Buddhism spirits and values to the problems of society (King, The Social Ethics of Engaged Buddhism, 2005). On the other hand, the reason of emergence of “Engaged Buddhism” was similar to the third problem Taixu discovered as I mentioned above.