Introduction
English people have an average per capita tea supply of 1,9 kg every year, which makes them one of the greatest tea consumers in the world since the eighteenth century. As the consumption of tea is so varied in the United Kingdom, it is very hard to generalize it. Most of the people in the United Kingdom enjoy drinking their tea with milk, but it is also very common to drink it black, green or with lemon. Putting some sugar in the cup as an addition also belongs to the standard. The British term "builder's tea" is a strong type of tea that is served with sugar and milk in a mug, which is also a popular combination to drink the tea today in the UK. The tradition of tea drinking in the United Kingdom is well-known worldwide, which
…show more content…
Kind Charles II enacted several acts that forbade the selling of tea in private places. In doing so, the king believed by these acts he will counter sedition, however, the popularity of tea rose with time (Whitehead, 2015). Examples of the laws he enforced were the tax act that needed the coffee houses to get an operating license (UK Tea & Infusions Association n.d). With the increasing prices of tea and the popularity it had gained, people started to smuggle it to lower the prices. Ships from Holland and Portugal would smuggle it to fishermen who propagated it inwards (Wikipedia n.d). Tea gained popularity from the 1670 and it sold in over 500 houses in 1700. By 1750, tea was being consumed by both Britain in the lower and upper classes. Despite the legal restrictions, tea had gained the popularity that it could be difficult to stop among the Britain. In 1785, the commutation act was introduced by William Britt dropping the taxes to 12.5% from 119% (UK Tea & Infusions Association n.d). With the well-established companies like East India company gave a monopoly on the importation and trade of tea, the beverage was well spread. With tea readily available tea customs started to develop with the most common being the afternoon tea developed by the 7th Duchess of Bedford. Tea gardens like the prestigious Ranelagh and Vauxhall started serving tea at 5 pm (Wikipedia n.d). In the late 18th-century tea shops and pottery were well established as good
on December 16, 1773, Samuel Adams organized a group of men called the Sons of Liberty. They dressed up as Mohawk Indians. They boarded three ships in the Boston Harbor and threw 342 chests of tea overboard. It took nearly three hours to accomplish this. The British Parliament passed the Tea Act on April 27, 1773 which was a import tax and it raised the price of tea to three cents per pound on all tea sent to America.
Even though it was repealed, the British government still needed revenue to pay the debt of the war and would soon tax the colonists again. The Tea Act In 1773, the British government passed another tax. This time tea was taxed. The tax actually made the tea cheaper in the colonies.
The Sugar Act was to prevent the colonies from printing their own money, and being able to proceed with gaining money. The act called Stamp Act was a tax on colonists, to gain more money by placing a tax on stamps and paper items such as playing cards, paper, and other miscellaneous items like dice. After passing the Stamp Act colonists were enraged about the taxing on their items by the British Parliament. Therefore they boycotted by not buying all the taxed items, years later the British Parliament repealed the stamp act cause of the boycott.
In 1773, the British Parliament passed the Tea Act and the colonists were not very pleased with it being passed. Governor Thomas Hutchinson decided to make sure that the tea would be
On December 16,1773 the Boston Tea Party took place. A man by the name of Samuel Adams and the Sons of Liberty took chests of tea and threw them into the Boston Harbor. Because of this, there were consequences also known as the Intolerable Acts or Coercive Acts. The Coercive Acts are a series of four acts: the Boston Port Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Justice Act, and the Quartering Act.
The Boston tea party of 1773, to reduce tensions in the colonies, parliament repealed almost all of the Townshend acts. However it kept the tax on tea, British officials knew that the colonial demand for the tea was high despite the boycott . But colonial merchants were smuggling most of this imported tea and paying on duty.. 2 The Townshend act in June 1716 parliament passed the Townshend act.
On May 10, 1773, Parliament passed the Tea Act, the primary objective of which was to save the British East India Company from bankruptcy. It also eliminated all tea tax except the three pence Townshend tax. A third goal of the Tea Act was to offer Americans tea at a lower price than that of the colonial smugglers [1]. However what happened was the average American colonist became angry with this latest act in a long line of unpopular policies, laws, and taxes imposed on him by Britain [2].
Under the Townshend Revenue Act, a tax had to be paid for the purchase of glass, lead, oil, paint, paper, and tea. These Non-Importation Agreements were some of the most effective means of colonial resistance against British policy before the American Revolution. Similar agreements were once again utilized throughout the colonies five years later to protest the Tea Act with the boycott of British East India Company’s tea that later resulted in the Boston Tea
Times were tough people could barely get by with the income they made and a tax on tea became an outrage within the colonies. One can only imagine the pain one felt giving away little of what they had to a government
However, in 1773, the East India Company noticed that there was an overproduction of tea and its prices surely would decline (“The Third Imperial Crisis”). Tea was one of the, if not the, most valuable asset to many members in Parliament. Britain was forced to impose a new Tea tax on the colonists, which was aimed to keep the price of tea high. Even this act was reasonable in the eyes of the British, but to the colonists, this was just a British way of assuring dominance considering it was now for profit rather than to pay off debts. The response to the Tea Acts was the Boston Tea Party of 1773 (“The Third Imperial Crisis”).
This was costly for the american colonist because the british sold their tea at a low rate however they would tax them as
and they too were attacked so they had to fire into the mob. Parliament passed the Tea Act, which gave the British East Indians company a complete monopoly of the American tea business meaning the colonists could only buy tea from this company. The colonists opposed this law even though it lowered the price of tea. They viewed the tea Act as merely another example
Hence them coming up with the “no tax without representation” - representation meaning a reason. The Tea Act’s main objective was to reduce the massive amount of tea held by the British East Indian Company whom had financial difficulties (like the rest of Britain). This allowed the company the right to ship directly to North America and the right to the duty-free export from Britain. The British colonists had never accepted the duty on tea thus The Tea Act just reinforced their opposition and hatred of it. On one day (December 16, 1773) all their hatred added up in the Boston Tea Party, in which the British colonists boarded East Indian Company ships where they dumped tons of tea overboard.
The boston tea party occurred when colonist as a way of rebelion attack british by throwing the tea that they found in their ships. And some people wonder why they did that and historic events show that there were French Indian War before that make the colonists to have an economic crisis so they can pay for the products. And the unique product that haven’t tax was the tea.
Besides the traditional items, such as the traditional music, cross talk and dancing performance, some new items were also added into our plan, like the scented tea, milk tea, tea meals and the DIY pottery making, etc. Our detailed entrepreneurship plan, which created a new business model of tea house, was high praised the professors of our university. This experience not only improved my understanding of tea culture, but also deepened my understanding of