Since 2010, the burqa ban has been a contentious topic. The general argument made by the French population – writers, lawyers, political authorities, citizens- is that the Burqa is a sign of oppression and an affront to secularity. More specifically, the Burqa is considered as a submission which contradicts with freedom principles as it has religious motives and sometimes families force women to wear it. When he was addressing the two national chambers in 2009, Nicolas Sarkozy, the former French president, stated, “the problem of the Burqa is not a religious problem. It is an issue of freedom and dignity of a woman. This is not a religious symbol, it is a sign of subservience, it is a sign of lowering” (Chrisafis, Angelique “Nicolas …show more content…
Indeed, the Burqa is used to promote a religious radicalism within the France. The burqa imprisons women in an Islamic fanaticism which provokes disdain for others. In fact, the Muslim feminist, Fadela Amara mentioned about the burqa ban, “it was necessary to fight the gangrene, the cancer of radical Islam which completely distorts the message of Islam” (“French minister urges Burka ban”, BBC ). Therefore, from her message, the burqa is a tool used to alter Islam and to fight against western principles through hiding behind religion. Hence, women who wear it are indirectly promoting an extremist Islam which leads to an excessive advocacy for a non-authentic and radical Islam. In addition, the burqa endangers women who wear it. More specifically, the New York Times reported that a pregnant French Muslim has been violently attacked by two men due to the her facial veil. Similarly, a retired teacher attacked a women wearing burqa, affirming that “the wearing of the veil is an aggressive act, there is no burka in my country”(Allen, Peter “Burka rage ' teacher faces jail in France after ripping off Muslim woman 's face veil”).These attacks clearly show that women who wear burqa are discriminated and they are unsafe. Likewise, Jacques Myard, member of the Union for a Popular Movement, stated “Women should not have to wear the burqa, which by its very nature excludes them from France’s secular Republic”. Thus, the burqa isolates women from France and exposes them to stigmatization. Although, women might say that their religious freedom is violated, I still maintain that burqa weakens the unity in France as it excludes these women from the French society. In conclusion, I strongly agree that the burqa should be banned as it participates to the spread of religious extremism by altering Islamic principles and as it is also a motive
Citation R. v. NS, 2012 SCC 72, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 726 – Niqab removal trial Facts: NS who is a Muslim woman made a complaint of being sexually assaulted by 2 men within family during her childhood. Both men were charged for the assault in 2007. During the opening inquiry in 2008, NS explained she was going to testify with her niqab on for religious purposes Legal issue Removing the witness’s niqab violates section 2 of the Canadian charter of rights and freedom Decision The Supreme Court dismissed the plea and is preparing a list of questions in order to decide whether or not the witness should be allowed to wear the niqab during the trail for religious purposes
Although Canada is one of the world’s most multicultural nations and is regarded as a leader in democracy, it has systematically targeted and excluded Muslim women from participating in their political freedom. Through the examination of the Niqab in Canadian society this essay will explore ways Muslim women have been “othered” in Canadian Society specifically concerned with the potential Niqab ban. A ban on the Niqab challenges and undermines the constitutional rights of Canadian Muslim women across Canada. A ban on the Niqab further segregates and excludes Canadian Muslim Woman, which in result incites a slur of negative outcomes.
The Middle East’s reaction has been mixed. In document #3 of the DQB, veiling is talked about. The document mentions that non-muslims think of veiling as a form
“Islam and Social Democrats: Integrating Europe’s Muslim Minority” states that “France began to restrict the wearing of girls’ headscarves in schools.” This shows that even though they should wear them as a part of their religion, they are not allowed. Whether or not one believes in religion, it shouldn't be up to them to decide for anyone else. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, it says “All innocent and Christian people are happy for the courts in Salem! These people are gloomy for it.
In 1939, Reza Shah’s unveiling declaration sparked a worldwide debate as to what the veil actually symbolizes. Ever since the beginning of Islam, women throughout the Islamic world have had to adopt the hijab as part of their cultural and religious attire due to various interpretations of the Islamic dress code. In addition, the Koran emphasizes purity in the name of Islam by asking both men and women to be modest when it comes to the way they dress. Furthermore, in his efforts to modernize Iran, Reza Shah failed to satisfy the needs of his people, as he gave women no say in what they could and could not wear in public. This eventually resulted in the division of Iranian women, as there were those who favored the Islamic tradition, and those who supported the regime and its adoption of Western values.
The aspect most concerning in this question is, is it reasonable to limit certain religious articles. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms under Equality Rights, in Section 15. (1), shows us that this is not a reasonable request as it is unacceptable to discriminate against someone because of their religion. Some may question that it is a safety reason, so they want to prohibit certain religious articles, for instance the burqa. Using the same logic, the society must also consider catholic nuns; they could also be considered a safety concern because they are covered in the same
The freedom of religion is stark contrast to that of the government workings and legal affairs, but is still an important factor of canadian life. Religion is a belief system meant to be untouched by law, as long as they remain a peaceful congregation, and though time and time again does hate groups try to level on their rights, the judicial courts of Canada have continued to terminate such issues. The most recent and well known case winning would be of the niqab controversy. Zunera Ishaq, a Pakistani immigrant, had won against the conservative government in two levels of court over the right to wear her niqab at her citizenship oath, before the new Liberal government dropped the former 's appeal to the Supreme Court. The reasoning behind her continued victory was because the courts had viewed the case as a violation to her religious freedom, as the niqab relates to her muslim faith.
* The article “Reinventing the veil” by Leila Ahmed discusses how the concept of hijabs has changed over time. Back then many people had the assumption the veils would
All over the world there are many different symbolism in other cultures. Some symbols might mean evil for one culture and others might mean innocence for another culture. For example of a symbol that many people might find frightening is the Nazi’s swastika. Western cultures like the U.S and Europe think that it means it’s a white supremacy. The swastika doesn’t original mean Aryan race to take over the world.
To Lughod, this is liberating for women (Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Lughod, 36). Lughod also argues that the veil (i.e. Burqa, niqab etc.) is an appropriate form of dress for the societies in which these women live because it ‘protects’ women from unwanted sexual advances from nonrelative males. Lazreg, on the other hand, believes that women in the West, such as Lughod, romanticize the veil, and that the “glorification of the veil overlooks the experiences of women who have…been socialized into concealing their bodies, and made the veil part of their persona” (Lazreg, Why Women Should Not Wear the Veil, pg. 102). Lazreg is making the argument that Muslim women have been socialized into the politics of the veil and has allowed it to define their piety as
This week's readings focus on the issues of freedom and enlightenment. In Angelique Chrisafis’s essay France’s headscarf war: ‘Its an attack on freedom’ we are introduced to the problems many Muslim women in France are experiencing regarding their traditional headscarf, the hijab. Chrysalis explains that the French Republic lays a great deal of importance and focus on the separation of church and state and, therefore, do not allow any religiously affiliated clothing or items to be worn in the public work sector. However, many Muslim women are upset, embarrassed, and feel targeted by the treatment they are receiving at the hands of different institutions in France when wearing their hijab. The on-going battle between the right to religious
It is meant to symbolize protection of the weak and self-defense but, wearing of such a weapon has been argued to be dangerous to those around such person as it is still a lethal weapon. Teachers believed that the student should not be able to wear the weapon on school grounds as it endangered the safety of nearby students. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in favor of individuals arguing that such a weapon impeached their rights to safety and as such the Supreme Court banned the wearing of such a weapon in places like school to protect the safety of the people4, even though this violates the religious rights of Sikhs. These cases of the niqab and kirpan show that a person’s religious rights can be violated if it violates another person’s right to safety and
Do you understand?”(Hosseini 63). Journal Entry: (Q) What is it that causes Rasheed to hold to such beliefs? Previously, Mariam had much more freedom, but Rasheed is strict about her behaving in a way that he deems proper and wearing a burqa. After doing some research, I have found that it is commonly understood that women wear these burqas to demonstrate their religious devotion.
It was later called The Islamic Revolution” (Satrapi 3). The readers see right away that every students entered school was asked to wear veil due to the fact that “1980: The Year it became obligatory to wear the veil at school” (Satrapi 3). The veil symbolizes the restriction of social liberties for
For instance about the hijab, westerners think hijab is a form of restraint for a woman. On the contrary it is a form of protection offered by Islam. We cannot deny that woman is the main target of a bunch list of criminalities. Hijab actually protects woman by covering the most attractive part of