Millions and millions of dollars are spent each year improving education. The George W. Bush administration published a Fact Sheet (para. 6, 2002) that found that since 1965, America has spent more than 130 billion dollars trying to improve education. The Congressional Digest (Timeline 2017) lists sixteen initiatives that have been passed since 1965 for federal support K-12. The initiatives passed attempt to correct inconsequential problems or counteract the positive initiatives previously passed. Overall, educational policy and reforms that aim at standardization do not leave room for educators to include diversity into the classroom.
The current public education system was designed based on the enlightenment’s value of intellect, but the
…show more content…
The ESSA eliminates parts of NCLB including the elimination of NCLB’s abominable approach to standard accountability and rids schools of unnecessary testing. Also, ESSA includes forethought about college readiness and preschool preparation. The Congressional Digest (ESSA 2017) included more highlights including that ESSA, “Sustains and expands this administration’s historic investments in increasing access to high-quality preschool” (para. 6). NCLB solely focused on academic achievement based on results from academic testing when evaluating schools and teachers; ESSA considers more than just standardized tests when evaluating teachers. ESSA also brings diversity into evaluation. Under NCLB, schools had to bring all students up to proficiency standards, this includes special education and at-risk children. Another highlight from the Congressional Digest (ESSA 2017) includes “Advances equity by upholding critical protections for America’s disadvantage and high-need students” (para. 6). ESSA helps increase educational opportunity for all …show more content…
The shift in power to the states can be risky. The federal government must trust each of the states to develop its own reform that could be potentially unequal. With the federal government in charge, states were held to the same standard. The flexibility given to the states could leave disadvantaged students unprotected or average students forgotten. All students in public schools depend on the states to establish structure and protect the value of education within the schools. The upside to flexibility given to the states includes diversity from school to school. Flexibility given to the states puts power into the hands of the leaders that closest serve the students. State and local educators can maintain standards while doing what they know is best for children in their
Over the years the federal government has taken over many of the rights that belong to the states. For instance, the national government has taken over the education systems within the states. Elementary, middle, and high schools should be controlled by the local governments within its state. The authority of education within the state is given to the state government.
Those who were responsible for crafting essa ESSA sought to shift the focus from federal accountability and oversight to more local and state-based control; under President Obama’s waiver program, CCSSI and RTT initiatives, the direction of education policy was one on increased federal control over education. An oft-quoted Wall Street Journal editorial claimed that ESSA would represented, “the largest devolution of federal control to the states in a quarter-century.” Chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee John Kline further billed ESSA as a rejection of the “Washington-knows-best approach to education” and touted ESSA as “the kind of responsible education reforms the American people want and deserve.” While the rhetoric
The author admits that some of these school changes lead to a better education for citizens. All in all the process of states paying for education is a complex one that involves many factors for each state to preserve the money that they has been provided by
This act was signed by the President Obama on December 10,2015. In 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act was enacted. Overtime the NCLB act was not working for schools and educators. According to Obama ESSA includes provisions that will ensure success for students and schools.
In addition, the Government Accountability Office [GAO] (2016) reported: “from school years 2000-2001 to 2013-2014, the percentage of all K-12 public schools that had high percentages of poor and black or Hispanic students grew from 9 to 16 percent” (p. 2). These findings suggest that practices of racially and economically segregating students of color continue unresolved. Sadly, poverty and race are automatic disqualifiers for children of color to have equal access to quality
A major issue in American politics today is the issue of school funding and how schools should be funded. In the current funding system for American public schools, nearly half of the funding comes from local property taxes. This causes disparity among schools in wealthier areas compared to poorer areas. The faults in this system has caused a large group of people to fight for equal funding in public schools to allow for fair and equal public schooling. In the article “Unfinished Business: The Legacy of Brown v. Board of Education”, written by William C. Hubbard, he states that “We have to stop tolerating separate and unequal schools in this country today, and we must reenergize public education in America through equitable funding.
This type of federalism returned power to the states through block grants and aimed to reduce the national government's control. Federalism has changed dramatically over the course of many years, but finding the right balance among states and the federal government is a difficult challenge to overcome. One of the most challenging problems that federalism faced is whether the states are using funds for the purposes
No Child Left Behind The No Child Left Behind Act is a United States Act of Congress that is a rewrite of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Brought before congress in 2001 and passed into law in 2002, this act was set into place to close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child is “left behind” academically. No child left behind is a standardized education reform based on the idea that setting high standards and establishing goals that can be measured, will improve individual outcomes in education by having educational facilities held accountable for testing scores.
In this research paper I will be covering the pros and cons of the Texas government privatizing the school system, or in other words implementing a school voucher system. The pros of the Texas government privatizing the school system is the potential for better educational opportunities and quality of schools. Next, I will discuss the freedom of school choice among students and parents which allows them to choose what’s best for them. Secondly, I will discuss how there will be less government regulation, therefore schools can be ill-prepared or biased.
Schools servicing low income students are being shortchanged districts disproportionately distribute funds. According to a report from the U.S. Department of Education, “The analysis of new data on 2008-09 school level expenditures show that many high-poverty schools receive less than their fair share of state and local funding, leaving students in high-poverty schools with fewer resources than schools attended by their wealthier peers.” Providing more resources and a better education for students in wealthier areas not only increases the achievement gap, but it increases the social status gap in America. While the nation acknowledges that inequality is an issue, proper action is not being taken. Until this issue is seriously addressed and action is taken, and poorer schools are provided the necessary tools to succeed, the public school system in America will not have the opportunity to produced skilled
“ Under the Obama administration, the federal government functioned as a giant octopus, bypassing families, communities, and states in order to reach its tentacles into the school curriculum, teacher evaluation, values conformity and even restroom policies.” ( Ashford 2017) Her idea is to let kids of different religions build their own schools or choose which schools they go too. The funding will be more evenly distributed giving disadvantaged kids the chance to learn. These disadvantaged kids will have the choice of what school they can attend too.
Although the NCLB Act implemented in 2001 has shown great efforts for trying to ensure the equality for all students, it does not successfully provide effective achievement for minorities, underprivileged kids, or students with disabilities across the nation. Implementers of the NCLB Act should create a more personalized version to accommodate children with certain disabilities in addition to the regular version of the act. The NCLB Act that was created in 2001 ensures that regular children capable of learning like the average student get the appropriate service to react to the government’s state academic assessments, but those who require special accommodations although have been successful enough to improve test scores, still are not meeting
The projected number of students in public schools in the year 2030 will increase by around 10 million according to the U.S Department of Education but these students will not evenly spread out across the nation (Lytton, 2011). A perfect example of this is the Dearborn Public School District and Detroit Public Schools District. Dearborn’s public school population has increased consistently over two decades while Detroit’s public schools has seen a constant decrease in enrollment over the years. While Dearborn’s public schools continues to grow in student population this also allows them to be financially strong and not have to worry about school closures rather think on how they will need to accommodate for new students. Detroit’s public schools however lost a significant number of students over the years which drastically affected the funding they were receiving and there expenses were much higher than the amount they were bringing in.
Standardize testing has come under a great deal of scrutiny with regarding to correctness and fairness but are still widely used today. The United States have been the most criticized nation as it pertain to the school system. However, several programs sprouted out of the dirt such as physical fitness, core programs and programs for the gifted and not very gifted. The government added the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) which is designed to help less fortunate students improve their education
Public school funding Increasing school funding is very important in today’s future American students. Education should be one of the top priorities in the United States to make sure every student has the same opportunity to get the same great education. Increasing public school funding be beneficial for outdated textbooks, lack of technology, and increases more resources for students. These resources would be crucial of generating students of America. These students are the workers, leaders, and inspirations of future America.