Bush v. Gore was a Supreme Court case that occurred in 2000 after the presidential
election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. After Florida citizens casted their votes, officials
noticed the numbers were very close; Bush led Gore by only about 1,800 votes. Florida law
allowed Gore the option of manual recount in the Florida counties of his choice. He chose to
have votes of four counties recounted. Florida law also required that the state’s election be
certified by the Secretary of State, Katherine Harris, within 7 days of the election (November
14th, 2000). Three of the four counties were unable to complete the recount by the deadline. On
November 14th, a Florida circuit court ruled that Secretary Harris must respect the deadline,
…show more content…
They could not agree on
many aspects of the case, as two majority opinions and four minority opinions were filed. They
explained that they made their decision based on the fact that the state of Florida violated the
14th Amendment by enacting a recount, the Equal Protection Clause specifically. This clause
requires the federal government to respect, maintain, and uphold the legal rights of American
citizens. Government cannot infringe on the civil rights of the people. They decided that asking
for the recounts violated the rights of the citizens of Florida (phschool.com, 1).
Florida Supreme Court ruled that the recount order was unconstitutional mainly because
of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. This clause granted protection to ballots
and the citizens casting them. It forbids government from denying "to any person within their
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. The court argued that privately voting in a
presidential election is a fundamental right guarded by this clause. They also alleged that the
order consisted of unequal processes that violated the intent of the voter. These orders went
beyond the standards required to be followed by Florida law (McBride,
She filed the Sixth District Court of Appeals ruling Thursday, Oct. 20. In that decision, a three-judge panel affirmed the U.S. District Court decision, writing, “The district court’s opinion carefully and correctly sets out the undisputed facts and law governing the issues raised, and clearly articulates the reasons underlying its decision. Thus, issuance of a full written opinion by this court would serve no useful
The election Gore V. Bush was not legitimate. Both parties used their advantages to the fullest no matter how unfair. For example, when Bushes team found out that there was still 51 counties and Gore was only down by 98 votes, they put the counting to a stand still. Bushes team in a way bought the Florida Legislator for their decision.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (U.S. 1896) gave states the legal right to require persons of different races to use separate but equal segregated facilities. But that ruling was struck down in the landmark case of Brown v. Bd. of Educ. , 347 U.S. 483 (U.S. 1954), In that case the court held that separate but equal public schools based on race is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and is unconstitutional. In upholding that decision, Cooper v. Aaron held that state governments must comply with Supreme Court rulings and court orders based on the its interpretation of the
Speaking for the majority was Justice Henry Brown. He stated that “a statute which implies merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races -- has no tendency to destroy the legal equality of the two races.” (Wormser, n.d.). In addition, that the 14th amendment was to undoubtedly enforce the equality of the two races before the law, and that it could have not been intended to abolish distinctions base on color (Wormser, n.d.). This case law allowed for segregation as long as that everyone were treated
The Brown decision reversed the separate but equal doctrine established by the Plessy decision. Forming the 14th amendment guaranteeing equal protection under the law, and the Court ruled that separate facilities based on race was unequal. This law and the Brown case were significant when fighting the rights of Hernandez because it labeled Mexican Americans as minority
The ruling was later change by the review panel of judges in the Supreme Court, who found out that the law was
In 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States of America ruled that section four of the Voter’s Registration
In this case, the votes were being taken away from Al Gore and given to George W. Bush (1). If those ballots were counted in the time they were given, I believe that Al Gore would have been ahead. Also, there are 67 counties total in the state of Florida and 18 of those counties were supposed to be counted, however, only two, which were Palm Beach and Volusia, ballots were being recounted (1). The two
I am writing separately because I do not believe Florida’s sentencing scheme violates Hurst’s sixth amendment. I agree with the dissent that Apprendi and Ring should be overruled in favor of something more in line with Walton and our precedent prior to the new millennium. I concur in the judgment, however, because the jury’s role in Florida’s capital sentencing scheme is unconstitutional. Florida does not require unanimity or a feeling of responsibility by the jury in the death sentencing scheme. Also, Florida only requires a simple-majority vote to render its verdict instead of one that is unanimous.
One case in particular, McCleskey v. Kemp, was decided in The Supreme Court. Mccleskey v. Kemp was wrongly decided by the Georgia courts and then also by The Supreme Court, in which they decided that it did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. McCleskey v. Kemp was one of the few cases to reach the high level of impact that this
The state of Louisiana argued that each state has the right to make rules to protect public safety. Louisiana claimed it was its public will to have segregated facilities. They claimed the separate facilities were equal and satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment and white citizens. Justice Henry B. Brown of Michigan delivered the court decision. It was a 7 to 1 decision that stated Louisiana law did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment.
The citizens committee found this as a test on the constitutionality of the separate car laws. The reasoning for this was stated that each state could have individual laws for the specific state. These laws were not limited to just the cars, but to schools, hotels, and even restaurants. Only one man had open opinions about the verdict, his name was Justice John Marshall Harlan. He informed others that the constitution was being violated and risked the possibility of legalizing race discrimination although the constitution saw no color.
Linda Brown (a 3rd grader) was not allowed to go to a school close to her house because of segregation. Her father sued the school system because it was 'a violation of the 14th amendment '. It was ruled in favor of Brown. This case told the work that is schools could be segregated, everywhere else should (and would)
Recounts were started, then stopped as Republicans and Democrats wrangled over what standards to apply. It was more than a little chaotic. The Supreme Court actually interposed itself into the election contest three times. Only the last two are known as Bush v. Gore.
Shortly following this decision, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was approved, which enforced the Fifthteenth Amendment. This was accomplished by making poll taxes illegal in federal elections, banning the use of literacy tests, and establishing federal oversight of voter registration in areas that had less than fifty percent of non-white populations registered. It also specified that voting qualification or requisites cannot be denied on account or race or color and that a person’s ability to read or write cannot deny them the right to vote. Unfortunately, this has not entirely stop discrimination at polls, as many states still have voter ID laws and oftentimes people are forced to take time off work to make it to the polls. This