Merger and acquisition are term used to define the consolidation of companies. When two companies are combined to form a single unit, it is known as merger, whereas acquisition refers to the purchase of company by another one, which means that no new company is formed, but one company has been absorbed into another. Mergers and Acquisitions are important component of strategic management, which comes under corporate finance. The subject deals with buying, selling, dividing and combining various companies. It is a type of restructuring, with the aim to grow rapidly, increase profitability and capture a greater proportion of a market share.
Mergers and acquisitions aim to increase market share, profits and influence in the industry. Mergers
…show more content…
Essentially, a business will attempt to merge with another business that has complementary strengths and weaknesses.
Diversification / Sharpening Business Focus: These two conflicting goals have been used to describe thousands of M&A transactions. A company that merges to diversify may acquire another company in a seemingly unrelated industry in order to reduce the impact of a particular industry's performance on its profitability. Companies seeking to sharpen focus often merge with companies that have deeper market penetration in a key area of operations.
Growth: Mergers can give the acquiring company an opportunity to grow market share without having to really earn it by doing the work themselves - instead, they buy a competitor's business for a price. Usually, these are called horizontal mergers. For example, a beer company may choose to buy out a smaller competing brewery, enabling the smaller company to make more beer and sell more to its brand-loyal
…show more content…
A big part of the problem is that of all the myriad complex decisions that senior executives make before and during a merger, one is mandatory and critical but often given short shrift: the branding of the new corporate entity. That can be a huge blunder. With no solid brand platform to work from, company integration will often be mismanaged, and communications to key constituencies will necessarily suffer. In the worst of situations, the relationship between the two organizations becomes contentious; promised synergies remain elusive; employees become distrustful and disgruntled; and customers grow cynical and
This strategy is much more harder to implement as Cobra would need to go to their parent company Molson Coors and explain the idea and even need their backing financially. Molson Coors may be expecting a certain return before they invest any money so that would need to be considered. This can help Molson Coors throughout their other beers as they produce other beers and buying a can supplier can be beneficially for all the beers they produce. Additionally if they reject the idea and Cobra want to still go ahead with it they might have to look for foreign investment to be able to do it. To be able to implement this idea there would need to be either a takeover of the supplier or a joint venture.
For instance, John D. Rockefeller pursued numerous of strategies, to try to eliminate his competitors. From horizontal integration, in which he tried to buy or force his competitors out, to vertical integration, which Andrew Carnegie also practiced, meaning they eventually owned everything they needed to produce. J. Pierpont Morgan had a different strategy in an attempt to monopolize his company, he would help merge competing corporations by purchasing massive amounts of stocks and selling them at a profit. These strategies helped capitalize the entrepreneurs control in the growing
The company could expand even more to increase their market share. They must keep communications open through their relationships to avoid miscommunication and confusion. References Karniel. A and Reich.
During the period of 1870 to 1900 large corporations, such as the railway company, grew significantly in size, number, and influence. The cause of this was the need for a new way of transportation, the demand was great so the railways expanded all over the United States so that they could meet these demands. These large corporations affected the economy by making it easier to pay for everyday chores, politics in the way that it gave politicians too much power but in doing so gave normal limited power. The corporations had great power and influence which made them a huge impact to society.
Even further, these robber barons would often ruthlessly eradicate competition by buying out other companies to establish monopolies through the horizontal and vertical integration of production and product.
The concept of vertical integration received an immense
Companies are pressured to release new products faster than competitors. Another is increased competition for government contracts, has to compete with Samsung and Apple for contract
The giant pharmaceutical company Bayer purchased Monsanto. With the merging of these companies, Bayer now controls over a quarter of all seeds and pesticides in the world. With several agriculture companies merging, this leaves farms with fewer options for where they decide to purchase pesticides, seeds, and fertilizers. These quick merging of powers threaten food prices and food security. The airline industry has also seen the organic formation of monopolies.
Current Strategies: Kohl’s Department Store plan is to operate many stores as possible after 5 years. Additionally they planning to have the “Lowest Prices of the Season” sale for the every customer. Kohl’s will still continue their coupon and discount cards to attract more customers. Kohl’s strategy is to have many sales as possible by having low prices of their products (Cadence, 2010). Macys on the other hand strategy plan is to attract customers by offering superior selections of products with reasonable value.
The five forces industry competition also known as the five forces model or Porter’s model was developed by Michael Porter in the late 1970’s. It is a tool utilized in businesses to analyze the industries current profitability and attractiveness from the outside-in perspective. In this era of technology, this model may not be as precise or practical, as it was when it was created years ago, for technology has taken production, marketing and industries in general, to another level. Companies have developed significantly over the years with easy access and affordable rates to internet services, with both the companies and customers being able to do business from the comfort of their homes or offices.
Market Structure - Oligopoly Oligopoly is a market structure whereby a few number of firms owns a lion’s share in the market. This market structure is similar to monopoly, except that instead of one firm, two or more firms have control in the market. In an oligopoly, there are no upper limits to the number of firms, but the number must be nadir enough that the operations of one firm remarkably influence and affects the others (Investopedia, 2003). The Walt Disney Company is categorized under an oligopoly market structure.
Many mergers tend to fail and many others succeed. A merger is the combining of assets and operations, usually between two similar sized companies, in an agreement to join together. Mergers can cause bankruptcy, job losses, less choices, and even a breakup. On the other hand, they have many advantages such as, increased market share, lower cost of production, and higher competitiveness. Most mergers can be highly risky but with the presence of knowledge and intuition they can be successful.
Question 1 Several factors have been proposed as providing a rationale for mergers. Among the more prominent ones are (I) tax considerations, (2) diversification, (3) control, (4) purchase of assets below replacement cost, and (5) synergy. From the standpoint of society, which of these reasons are justifiable? Which are not?
Exit barriers are high… Rivals are highly committed to the business and have aspirations for leadership, especially if they have goals that go beyond
Apple Inc. embraces diversification strategy as a means of promoting its viability in the market. Largely, the creation of the three products lines compounds the sources of the company’s income. In fact, the company does not rely on a single source of income because the product design belongs to different categories. This strategy cushions the business from suffering risks of associated with depending on a single business. According Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson (2014, p.135), the benefit of handling many products is that when one product fail or does poorly in the market, the business is would shift its attention of the best performing products.