Kerrie's Case Study: Managing An Organization

988 Words4 Pages
Student Answer: Kerrie Peterson is a general manager of a large business division in a company that deals with financial services. She has a record of accomplishment of growing the business expressible but she now has the challenge of leading an unpopular change, a cost reduction initiative. Kerrie knew the cost reduction effort was going to be a test of her leadership ability (Lester & Parnell, 2006) In the first part of Kerrie’s case, she decides to use a team-player approach in development and selection of strategies to hit a 15 percent cost reduction goal (Lester & Parnell, 2006). The percentage was set for her business unit. She assembles an effective team but she is aware of the challenge that her team will experience. She is also aware…show more content…
Fayol’s unity of direction states that in principle, an employee should receive orders from one superior only. Dual command usually wreaks havoc in all fields of concern; since, authority is undermined, discipline is in jeopardy, order of rule is disturbed and stability of an organization is threatened. Kerrie violates the direct rule of the account management to seek help from the senior management. This disrupts the chain of authority since one authority is accountable for the other. Therefore, canceling one authority shows an ineligibility concern.She eventually attempts to correct the mistake through seeking help from a higher authority attempting to control and respect her authority over her assigned project. She also attempts to suppress the anger and deterrence by the accounts department through talking to the senior department. This helps her make time to enable her to go through files and documents and refers to the internet on how she can eventually improve on accounting systems in the reduction of the twenty percent. The improvement and delivery of the completed project was dependent on how each department would cooperate to make sure the project was delivered on time.References:Lester, D., & Parnell, J. (2006). Organizational Theory. Cincinnati, OH:…show more content…
The benefit of the solution entails group-based solutions. Group-based solutions always involve a joint force of the societal energy to work towards achieving a common goal. The advocacy of strength in human diversity require brainstorming and research of a project by a panel before its implementation starts. Situational leadership is an opportunity that gives each one an opportunity to handle a leadership fields. In addition, a focus on the on-going process to view a step-to-step in project processes.However, the rule of authority according to Fayol’s principles and Mary Parker Follett is not supposed to be messed with rather mutual counsels and evaluation of projects should be in one mind. This assure focus to ease the achievement of goals. In addition, each person or individual leading a project or part of a project should be given leadership in a part of interest to mentor others in handling projects. This will give continuity of a leadership and nurture of new leaders to lead projects just in case the present leaders will not available.References:Lester, D., & Parnell, J. (2006). Organizational Theory. Cincinnati, OH:

More about Kerrie's Case Study: Managing An Organization

Open Document