This ennui felt by the individual in the face of modernity was crucial to the expression of modernism. To say that modernism is an articulation of the spirit of modernity – a way to match the experience of modernity in literary expression – is a limited claim. Modernism was more a reaction to the conditions of modernity, a way to deal with it. The early European modernism had a tendency to resist the fragmentation and chaos of the modern world by expressing it in new dynamic forms and hoping that this literary expression would be a ‘retreat or refuge from modernity – shelter from its destruction’ (Matz 9). Whether it was Eliot or Lawrance, Joyce or Woolf, Kafka or even Hemmingway, the authentic expression of modernity was always laced with …show more content…
In 1995, Pankaj Mishra published his book Butter Chicken In Ludhiana – an account of his travels across small town India in 1993-94. The premise of the book itself signifies a major shift in Indian society – the emergence of small town India. These small towns were not the metropolitan power centres, nor were they representative of the idyllic Gandhian imagination of ‘real India’ in villages. They were a crucial middle-ground formed as a result of industrial modernity in India which challenged the many pre-suppositions about the Indian nation. With the emergency (1975-77), coupled with the statism and corruption of Licence Raj, the idealism of the concept of nation based on Nehruvian socialism shattered (Radhakrishnan 2). Notions of secularism and such grand-standing slogans like ‘unity in diversity’ could not be taken for granted with the growing communalism – its high point being the demolition of Babri Masjid in 1993. And the Dalit movement raised several uncomfortable questions and ‘pushed the bristly issue of contemporary casteism on to the public fora across the country’ (Poduval 8). The rise of separatist terrorism in Kashmir in the 90s is only one example of threats to the ‘integrity’ of India nation which by now were more vigorous and overt. In a way each element of the modern definition of Indian nation - ‘Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, …show more content…
With the old ideals in a state of redundancy, the modern India of late 80s and early 90s came up with newer promises. The promise of technology and modernization, the Mandal commission’s promise of reservations for the underprivileged castes, the promise of a free market liberalism, and the promise of reinstating the unified identity of India, albeit in Hindu majoritarian
One of the film’s on this course was ‘Six Degrees of Separation’ an adaption of the Pulitzer- Prize nominated play by John Guare. Two theories that we studied that applied to this film are; Post- Modernism and Structuralism and the concepts; pastiche and collage, genre and intertextuality. I will be analysing the movie while applying these two theoretical concepts and discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each in the conclusion. Six degrees of separation is the theory that everyone and everything is connected by six or fewer steps from any other person in the world. Frigyes Kerinthy originally came up with the theory but it became popularized by Guare in ‘Six Degrees of Separation.’
To what extent does food as a motif represent structure and bonds among characters in the novel? Paradise Of The Blind, written by Duong Thu Huong tells the story of a young Vietnamese girl in the 1980s. As Hang travels to Moscow by train she recounts her life experiences and contemplates on her past during the corrupt communist reign. The novel describes events through Hang’s perspective and illustrates her childhood memories using various motifs. Particularly, food is used as the most recurring and notable motif.
Ever wondered why a lot of food commercials and cleaning products have black woman as the face of them? It isn’t merely because these women just got lucky and landed a mainstream commercial, they were chosen for a particular reason. It’s the fact that their black and they give off the perfect Mammy persona. Mammy is a term that originated in the post slavery era. It was used in relation to the house slave that tended to the master, his children, and his wife.
The Marāthās, in particular, became so enraged that they eventually gained their independence from the Mughals and established their own empire,” (Gale). The departure of the Marāthās proves the lack of religious tolerance the Mughals had at times. The Marāthās were so enraged at the lack of acceptance that they left the empire rendering it smaller and weaker. This is just one example of the Mughals not only only neglecting to practice religious tolerance, but how refusing to accept all people for their beliefs backfired in the empire’s overall growth and unity.
Muslims still felt less important than the Hindus fearing Muslim interests wouldn’t be protected by the mainly Hindu congress. In conclusion for Dr. Lalvani to say that the British over all helped and positively impacted India completely disregards the fact that Indians had to go through so much loss and pain through struggles and challenges that India has to go through
In addition, Nehru explained that Muslims “are of us and will remain of us whatever happens” (Document 2). Not only did Gandhi help to achieve what each religion wanted, but did so while himself and Nehru encouraged Hindus and Muslims to remain
rgumentative Essay Have you ever wondered what it means to be modern? Being modern means acting in a different way than others after realizing the consequences after it. Everyone should have an opportunity to step out of their comfort zone and show their true colors. Janie crawford was modern when she stepped out of her comfort zone and decided to stand up for herself and free herself from being someone who she wasn’t. Harrison Bergeron had an opportunity to show how smart he really was compared to the people around him who could’nt.
Chapter one 'The Crisis of the Age of Reason ', deals with the beginnings of romanticism, the radical shift it caused from an unoriginal event to an expressive visual, how it led to the cult of the artist genius and these same
One Amazing Thing. Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni. USA: Hyperion, 2009. 209pp. Under the rubric of Commonwealth Literature, there is always a bewildering array of overlapping and intersecting experiences between ‘home’ and ‘abroad’.
The consequences of the aestheticism movement and more specifically, self-indulgence, are not only prominent in the novel but also in Wilde’s own life.
The diction and tone in Woolf’s essay affects her message as it was melancholy and calm. The diction was clear and understandable to ensure that the audience could understand her message, rather than try and decipher large incoherent words. Woolf also uses many words with negative connotations, but takes a neutral attitude to the subject. At the beginning of the essay Woolf 's tone is very hopeful, but as the essay progresses it turns dark and somber. At the beginning Woolf used phrasing such as “ Pleasant morning” (Woolf 5) and “enormous energy of the world”(Woolf 24) .
By using casual diction, simple sentences, and well-known allusions, Woolf is able to shift the audience’s attention from the gender of the
Modernism began in early 1700s with the rise of capitalism. This was start of an age of rational thinking. The major belief of this age was to believe only those things which they could see. The idea of modernism is, to quote father of Modern Philosophy Rene Descartes, ‘I think therefore I am’(2). This basically meant believing only those phenomenon those can be seen or proved by science.
The novel is somewhat of a memoir of his journey to finding his freedom in India’s modern day capitalist society. The book shows how it can create economic division. In India there are not social classes, there are social
It provides a condensed history of the evolution of critical theories and discriminates between them with the aid of a simple diagram. The essay begins with the definition of modern criticism which is to exhibit “the relation of art to the artist, rather than to external nature, or to the audience, or to the internal requirements of the work itself”. This one and a half century old theory of art competed against innumerable theories such as the mimetic theory, the pragmatic theory, etc., all of which have been thoroughly discussed in the essay. Abrams quotes theorists such as Santayana and D.W. Prall to show the unreal and chaotic nature of these alternate theories.