This law allows police and officers to stop blameless people and frisk them. This law usually targets youth and people of color and this is extremly important reasons to stop it. A first example that shows that the law is not legal is that tons of people who get stopped are innocent. The second example that shows the illegality of the law would be that it is a discriminatory and racist law. However, other people have different opinions, other people think that "stop and frisk" help protects people from people that look suspicious and may risk the safety our society.
The Exclusionary Rule is grounded in the Fourth Amendment and it is intended to protect citizens from police doing illegal searches and collecting evidence. (How the) This means all evidence that was collected is inadmissible. However, this information is important and could help to label a criminal guilty. Criminal convictions have been minimal under this rule and criminals are getting away with more. The Exclusionary Rule only hampers police investigations.
Plea bargaining is a simple process but can have long term repercussions. Criminal defendants should not be allowed bargain for a reduced sentence in exchange for a guilty plea because some defense lawyers may not represent the best interest of the client, it does not allow the criminal defendant to take full responsibility for their actions, and the victim and the family will not feel as justice was served if a violent crime had occurred. Criminal defendants rely on their defense attorney to aid them in decision making to ensure that they are not being deceived. But when these defense
It also helps those who are afraid to speak out on hate crime or who have no opinionated voice be strong. Legislation allows for certain people to be protected under the law from hate crimes against them regardless of a prejudice. However, the disagreement against this is that if the government focuses too much on those who are afraid and defenseless, than those who wish to banish them have an easier time to criticize them because the government is so focused on making them an example of someone to protect. In effect, this makes them just as vulnerable for the focus being directed
One reason why Sigmund Brouwer did a good job saying her message because in the book Keets said “ you are crazy you are not telling the cops that someone shoot at your truck if you do not tell they they will do it again.That is say to not be secured to tell the cops if something happens to you because Keets told him that they will do it again and this time they did worse then before and you do not want your car burt. One more reason why the author did a good saying to not be secured to tell the cops if something happens to you is because when they get back the cops are there and Dakota had to answer questions the cops had. That is saying to to not be secured to tell the cops if something happens to you because who wants to keep answering questions to the cops. My last reason why the author did a good job saying his message because Dakota had to lie to the cops because he did not want anyone to know that his car had been shoot. That is saying to not be secured to tell the cops if something happens to you because he had to lie and if you lie to the cops you might get in double.
The convenient thing about this is that you can do as you please without the worry of the government trying to disrupt your peace. It also helps people of color feel protected from police officers who could be racist, and just want to go through their belongings to arrest them. Another advantage to this is that you don 't have to let police officers inside of your home if you don 't please to do so. However, the downside to this amendment is that valuable time to police officers is wasted since they have to wait for a search warrant to proceed with their job. Another downside is that if they do happen to search someone without a warrant and they find what they were looking for it won 't be able to be used as evidence against the
For some, lives will be at stake. Without the protection of a firearm, how is one supposed to protect them self and their family from potential threats? Many think that if the right to bear arms is taken away, crime rates will drop. However, criminals do not follow the law. Even if it were to be illegal to own firearms, corrupt people will find a way to obtain one.
Quentin Tarantino once said “Just because I was at an anti-police brutality protest, doesn 't mean I 'm anti-police. We want justice, but stop shooting unarmed people.” Some people that read this quote might totally disagree but i believe it to be true. Too many people these days think that just because your are anti-police brutality means that you are also just anti-police which is not the case. Even though the police force is doing all the can to handle the situation as much as possible, police misconduct and brutality in the United states is becoming more common and should be resolved immediately because it has led to too many innocent people dying because of their reckless actions which was all caused by police acting on situations
Racial profiling suspicious people of specific ethnicities will create a safer place because if the police were to arrest these people then the crime rates will drop, creating a safer place. "Modifying airport profiling procedures to include scrutiny of race, gender, and age has the potential to impact fundamental consultation rights" (MacDonald). If the police were to use racial profiling as a major part to justify if a person was guilty of a crime, that would create a safer environment. Racial profiling should be allowed for the police to use because it is easier for them to track down criminals. If a criminals was on the run and they were of a specific ethnicity then it would help the police to use racial profiling on all people of that ethnicity.