Overall, in the book, Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis, there are some very strong and applicable points that I believe, should be shared as much as possible. For instance, in the entire book one, Lewis rambles on about the moral law of society, and the outcome of peoples over complicated ways of thinking. He mentions the so called standard of behavior, which it upheld by the thinker to believe that whatever way he sees the situation should be the right way, and however the situation is presented in his mind is how it should be played out. Lewis gives many diverse examples of this action such as, sharing a “bit of orange,” since I “gave you some of mine.” the greed involved with the way of thinking is what Lewis called the law of nature. The
C.S Lewis begins “The Abolition of Man” speaking of Gaius and Titius’ “Green Book”. The “Green Book” serves as a visualization for a world without the Tao, allowing Lewis to set up his argument for the necessity thereof. The Tao represents a stable platform for which morals and ethics stand upon. The premise for “Men Without Chests” is that the Tao is unchangeable, there is right and wrong, and that right and wrong can only exist scrupulously inside the Tao. “The little human animal will not at first have the right responses.
I find Charles Lewis to have a valid point by saying that this country is in fact very militant. The reason why I think he says we don 't want to associate ourselves with wanting to be militant is because of all of the horrible things that can happen during war. When watching why do we fight every president has always gone into another country and tried to do it so that it was as if they did something to up hold America 's freedom. America likes to police the world and most Americans agree with it, this makes them feel safe. I think the real truth though in this statement is that fighting as a nation is in our best interest and we all should support anything our country
Lewis’s receiving a Bible as a young boy developed his strength in religion, which further strengthened
Debate According to the dictionary a pacifist is a person who believes that war and violence are unjustifiable. C.S. Lewis claimed not to be one in The Weight of Glory. He said that "The main contention urged as fact by Pacifists Lewis claimed that humans decide what is good and what is evil by their conscience. But, he argued that a person's conscience can be modified by argument.
The theme of Christianity is spread all around in C.S Lewis’ The Great Divorce, with its many
“And they will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord.” This is the terrifying inevitable truth found in 2 Thessalonians 1:9. Many people have come up with interpretations of Heaven and Hell to provide a better understanding of life after death. C. S. Lewis’ The Great Divorce is just one of many stories written to give Christians and non believers insight. The novel follows a man who finds himself presented with a choice to stay in Hell, where he originally found himself, or to make a decision to journey to Heaven.
C.S. Lewis and Freud Debate Response Paper Michaela Fry Department of Psychology, Palm Beach Atlantic University PSY-2183-01 Dr. McCulloch April 19th, 2023 Happiness According to Freud Freud’s view of happiness is centered around the idea pleasure and that happiness is a short-lived episode based on the intensity of pleasure one experiences (p. 100). Without sexual pleasure, humans will not experience the peak happiness that is accessible to humankind. Freud argues that the prominent desire for pleasure in order to fulfill the need for happiness is a natural instinct that develops at the beginning of one’s life.
In the Strategies for Reading and Writing, two essays were presented on the idea of religion: Theology and Religiosity and Religion. Theology is the study of God and nature of religion. C.S. Lewis questions the validity of faith based on experience. He explains the need for both theology and experience in a relationship with God. Theology helps outline and summarize the notations know or theorized about faith.
In “Theology,” C.S Lewis discuss that in order to have the right understanding about God we must have not just experience but doctrines. He suggests that a person must have the clearest ideas that he or he can find about God. He compares theology and experiences. C.S Lewis states that people experiencing faith get excited but they don’t get the same excitement when theology is brought up. “People turn from something real to something less real” (364).
“Wisdom is knowing what to do next, skill is knowing how to do it, and virtue is doing it (author anonymous).” Virtue is defined by Webster Online Dictionary as a conformity to a standard of right, a particular moral excellence. As Christians, we are instructed to stand apart from this dark and ominous world, to be a light in the darkness. Romans 12:2 says, “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good, acceptable, and perfect will of God.” The question then becomes, is averting evil enough to generate a virtuous person or must it be an active choice?
C.S. Lewis was a renowned author, philosopher, and storyteller. He was widely recognized for his academic intelligence and written classics. One notable aspect of his life occurred during Lewis’s transition from youth into adulthood, when he decided to convert to Christianity. This conversion process was not simple, as he had been heavily influenced by his friends and his father’s death. Soon after, he wrote and published many books of creative literature.
Sometime people tend to go with the wrong flow and end up away from God. Lastly and most importantly, people tend to now be exceedingly worldly. People are more open to wrong, sinful behaviors and accepting them in their lives. Which is especially the opposite of what God wants. In the end, Lewis’s style of writing does better equip one to better recognize Satan’s subtle deceptions through peer pressure, by joining the wrong crowds, going with the wrong flow, and becoming too influenced by the world and letting its sinful actions become
Vanessa Zamora I found great pleasure reading these texts over the past few weeks. The authors have opened my mind to recognize different ways of living through their perspectives. Whether I was influenced by their words positively or negatively, I was pleased to have read and been guided through new directions of different types of living. Below are my thoughts and feeling towards each of the readings and how each one has affected me.
In reading part three, I am left with many questions as Kant tries to explain the creation and operation of a new Christian faith that would “avoid the mistakes of previous ones” (Kant, 139.) As Kant discusses how this new Christianity is to work, he tries to mislead the reader in three ways. First, he redefines very well-known Christian terms to fit his ideas and uses this new Christian language to mislead readers. Second, Kant misquotes scripture and the Church fathers and uses them out of context to give validity to his points. Lastly, he attempts to show a Christianity conspiracy that the faith was created to bring people to a rational life.