When you first walk into the district court building, you get the feelings of authority and resoluteness. If I was not just an observer in the court hearings, I would have felt very uneasy, and nervous, because of the atmosphere that surrounds the building, and the employees of the building. Even before entering the courtroom you get the strong feeling of discipline and authority. I believe this feeling comes from the knowledge of knowing that your future is in the hands of the judge, and knowing that you made a mistake and now have to deal with the consequences. When we finally entered the courtroom The room was set up so that the judge was in the center of the room with their desk raised higher than the rest of the furniture. This set up gave me the feeling of power, the judge was meant to be the center of attention, and was definitely meant to be taken seriously. Throughout the hearing we were able to see the judge in action, and it was definitely a very interesting process to watch from the sidelines. When we first started the hearings, we were introduced to Jameson Benson. Jameson Benson was …show more content…
We were able to hear about Caleb’s case before we saw him at his court hearing, and from the information we received beforehand I was able to see that this man had some serious issues that he needed to work out before he was released. From Caleb’s history of mental illness the judge wanted him to receive treatment from a program the state was offering. Unfortunately during the trial there was a lot of miscommunication about this program. Because of this miscommunication the judge had to resentence Caleb another 40 days just so he could get the treatment he needed. When he was resentenced I felt relieved, for not only Caleb being able to receive the help that he definitely needs, but for his family as
The United States Criminal Justice system has a unique way of approaching and handling criminal trials. In criminal trials there are important court room members with specific roles and certain court room procedures that must be followed. The court room members include the jury, the judge, the prosecution, and the defense. Some of the procedures of a criminal trial are arraignment, preliminary hearing, the trial itself, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination, closing arguments and the verdict. Each court room member’s goal is to fulfill their responsibility and to help justice be served.
Jacobs caring older brother has gone to social services multiple times, but they had alway said they couldn’t help. Jacob has been charged as a youth, 1st degree murder x2 and will be in Rehabilitative Custody for 4 years. In Rehabilitative Custody it will allow him to work with doctors, help him learn how to solve problems in better/ good ways. It will help him
In July 1979, Gary Dotson was convicted of aggravated kidnapping and rape of a young woman in 1977. He was sentenced to not less than twenty-five and not more than fifty years. Many years after Dotson’s conviction, the victim recanted her testimony because she didn’t want anyone to know about a sexual encounter with her boyfriend so she fabricated the rape. Once the victim recanted her testimony, Dotson contended that the recantation constituted grounds to vacate the original sentence and he should be awarded a new trial. In 1987, the governor agreed to grant Dotson his last chance at parole.
In order for the people whose job it is to determine innocence or guilt of a person need more than just expert testimony in the form of a long drawn out explanation. Videos, photographs, or audio recordings are all helpful tools when presenting a case to a jury. In this case with Andrea Yates, there was so much evidence presented that could either have a positive or negative effect on the outcome of the trial. Prosecuting attorneys gave the jurors quite a horrific scene to digest mentally.
The article I’m writing about is Georgia toddler death: who is Justin Ross Harris? This article was written by Michael Pearson, CNN. The article is a criminal article. Harris is a 33-year-old man. He has worked at Home Depot for two years.
Justice Sotomayor’s first interests in the justice system began after she watched an episode of the show Perry Manson, in this particular episode the prosecutor had stated he did not mind loosing when a defendant turned out to be innocent. Justice Sotomayor then later said in an interview that she “made the quantum leap that if that was the prosecutors job the she wanted to be the person who made the decision to dismiss the
In other words, they believe there’s no doubt the Texas Justice System is for sale, for most judges in Texas have been found committing serious felonies during their professions (“The Mess in Texas: State and Federal Judges Accused of Everything from Arson to Corruption to Sexual Assault,” 2008). After conducting further research on this case, I could understand why those from 60 minutes feel angry about the idea. The first thing that caught my attention was Rick Perry. Even though Rick Perry was the former governor of Texas and not a judge, I feel that Texas have a tendency to choose corrupt and those who like to abuse their power. I still believe that every citizen should have a final say with not just presidents and government officials in Washington DC, but judges as well.
A fair and unbiased court system is necessary for the legal system. The role of the court is to correct any injustice, not to compound it. When prejudice and corruption leak into the courts, what recourse do we have for eradicating them from society? Our judges must be stalwarts of integrity because the power to move our country forward or hold our country back often lies in their hands. Judge Persky had the power to bring justice to a victim, to help her and her family move forward.
They heard the words of the accused and ended the case deciding the person’s fate. It could be assassination or imprisonment. The judges of this court were Jonathan Corwin, Samuel Sewall, John Hathorne, and John
As a U.S. citizen there are pretty much only three things you should be doing, that is paying taxes, voting, and serving on a jury. Skipping over the first two brings us to jury duty, which many feel to be a nuisance, but really, is it? Our right to a jury trial is one of the foundations our country was built on. Just because you don’t have a choice when it comes to jury duty, doesn’t mean it’s something that you should feel negative toward. Yes, that piece of mail we receive “summons” us to report to jury duty, but don’t think it that way.
To do this, they used various pieces of evidence and testimonies to convince the jury of their argument. The jury then decided whether or not Arias was guilty based on the claims of counsels, defense and prosecution. The judge was there to maintain order in the courtroom, negotiate between the counsels, and decide guilt, known as administrator, negotiator, and adjudicator respectively. Once Arias was convicted, the role then moves to correction. They are responsible for enforcing the punishment and incarceration that she was sentenced to.
Imagine how a court would be run if it was dysfunctional. With many pieces of evidence to solve one problem that can lead to months after months, just to say those words, “guilty or not guilty.” There was one case that caught everybody's attention and became very famous. In 1994, O.J Simpson was accused for brutally murdering his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. He was sentence to court, and it took about 10 months to come to a conclusion as he walked out of court as a freedman.
When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.
However, in balancing those flaws with their benefits, America’s judge selection process is satisfactory. Having a mixed system helps to aid in checks and balances between the government and the voting power of the
The judge was very observant with the defendants and at times had a good sense of humor. He would often ask the defendants why they did what they did, and if they had ever thought about the position they were in, and what this might do to their children. The judge was very understanding and reasoned with most defendants. He wanted to get a sense of what the defendant was thinking, and often gave good advice to those he felt deserved it. He appeared very relaxed and at