Canada prides itself at home and abroad as a country made up of a cultural mosaic rather than a cultural melting pot. The mosaic is based on our belief that Canada as a whole becomes stronger by having immigrants bring with them their cultural diversity for all Canadians to learn from. The cultural melting pot, as adopted in the United States, tells immigrants that no matter who they have been in the past, upon landing on American shores, they are Americans and are expected to adopt and follow the American way. At the heart of Canadian society is our legal system. Our legal system is based on the English Common Law model, which in turn is based on a value system that places a strict adherence to following procedural rules over the substantive …show more content…
The survey found that 50% of the population aged 15 and up felt that they had a very strong sense of belonging to their ethnic group. The feeling of belonging was greatest amongst first generation Canadians, who just came to Canada. Friends and family play a vital role in a new immigrant’s initial settlement in finding employment opportunities and housing. New immigrants who rely on friends and family from the same background also tend to be the same ones reporting a strong sense of belonging to their ethnic group. The sense of belonging to one’s ethnic group was measured by the individual’s awareness of ethnic heritage, customs and traditions by Stats Canada in a survey. About 63% of respondents who reported at least one ethnic ancestry other than Canadian found that maintaining their customs of high importance. Also, the same respondents also claimed to have to have a greater level of contact amongst their family members back from their place of origin. Another factor for why Canadians refer to their country as a “mosaic” has to do with participation within Canadian society. The survey found that immigrants and Canadians become more active in society as time progresses. First generation Canadians were the most likely to participate in ethnic or immigrant organizations. They are also more likely to vote in the elections, meaning they involved in their country’s
The Canadian legal system has almost complete control over Indigenous land and civil rights. Throughout history, Canada has been back and forth regarding Indigenous policy. Canada has had little to no regard over Indigenous rights and policy was mainly based on the goal of assimilation and colonization. Moving forward, there has been an improvement in Indigenous policies and the government regarding Indigenous issues. In regards to the Marshall Trilogy, St. Catherine’s case, the Lavell-Bedard case and the Daniels v. Canada case, the courts had at times put up a fight but Indigenous people fought for their rights sometimes winning and sometimes losing the battle.
In the judicialization of the Canadian political system, the judicial system became hierarchical with the Supreme Court's jurisprudence binding on all other courts. The judicialization of Canadian politics began when the judiciary started producing landmark court rulings concerning various contest issues more frequently (Hunt, 2013). The Supreme Court achieved what national politicians trying to amend the constitution could not, acknowledgment and validation in protecting the Quebec society and its most important feature: the French language. It also entrenched the policies of the Official Languages (Articles 16-20, 23) and multiculturalism (Article
Trudeau envisions Canada as composed of “diverse cultures” living in mutual respect, support and by sharing the nation in peace and in justice. Through bilingualism and the Multiculturalism Policy in 1971, Trudeau attempts to strengthen the national identity of Canada as a multicultural nation. At the same time, it encourages Canadians to embrace aspects of collectivism such as cooperation and collective interest. Trudeau further emphasizes the need for collectivism by stating that it is not regional barriers that will strengthen the economy but rather the bilingualism and the sharing of land such as crown like like national parks. While collectivism was emphasized through bilingualism and the Multiculturalism Policy in 1971, individualism was emphasized through the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
In 1892 the Canadian Criminal Code was proclaimed for a country that was never thought of to become a nation with more than 35 million individuals and as developed as it is politically, socially, and economically. Our great nation has expanded into an ever changing and transitioning society that as it moves forward crimes are committed across the board by individuals of Canada’s various different races and cultures, where in which sentences are demanded to ensure Canada remains fair and just. The 1892 Criminal Code didn’t account for the developments, expansions, and transitions that Canada has endured over a hundred years, and Canada looks nothing like it did in 1892. Due to the changes, our provinces and territories have all developed substantially;
Although for older generations it was difficult to assimilate, It was simpler for the offspring’s of the migrants. Thus, it can argued that an individual’s sense of belonging is dependents on their physical or external environment which can limit or enhance their sense of connection. Peter Skrzynecki uses a variety of language features and contextual background to provide an analysis
Canada is a diverse country, which consists of many ethnic groups and religions. The Canadian justice system does not abide too any religion or specific culture but too all. The Canadian justice system is one of the greatest in the world and consists of many different aspects, including public law and private law. The Canadian justice system is not the only system in the world but also one of the youngest systems when looking at code of Hammurabi. Code of Hammurabi is the earliest written laws in the world.
The History of law has helped form Canadian law today. Considering this we still have kept many of the concepts of law that were established long before. However, we have moved away from some former practices. The
It signifies their unwavering connection to Quebec and the lifestyle of a French Canadian, which they hold dear. By placing their Québécois identity at the forefront, they prioritize preserving and promoting Quebec's distinct cultural heritage and traditions. This emphasis on their regional identity allows them to fully embrace and live the Quebecois way of life, fostering a sense of belonging and pride. While they acknowledge and take pride in their Canadian citizenship, their more substantial connection to Quebec reflects their desire to preserve their unique cultural heritage and maintain a distinct sense of identity within the broader Canadian context. This individual's perspective highlights the importance of their Quebecois identity and their commitment to maintaining and promoting their regional community and culture.
Culture is defined as behaviours, values and beliefs shared by a group of people and passed on from one generation to another. Canada is a bilingual and a multicultural country. Canada is also known as a cultural mosaic as it allows people of many cultures to coalesce into one. Immigrates are coaxed to keep their culture and teach others about their cultures. Canada was established in 1867 by British North America act.
Canada has a very rich history, despite being a younger country than most. This history constitutes many different methods, good or bad, that Canadians have tried in order to develop a significant national identity. For instance, Canada played an important role in both of the World Wars in attempts to establish a distinct national identity on the global stage. After World War Two, Canada joined the United Nations and began performing peacekeeping missions to provide aid to countries, thus creating a new facet to the Canadian national identity. However, Canada has also used unjust methods, such as establishing residential schools as a way to assimilate the First Nations into the government’s idea of what Canadian national identity should be.
As mentioned I 've been exposed to diversity from a young age. I 've moved with family across Canada twice, from poverty stricken to affluent areas. From towns where you could leave doors unlocked to city blocks where gunshots a few streets over are your lullyby. Family still live outside the Oka reserve in Quebec and I 've French-Canadian relatives in New Brunswick. While through my friends, neighbors, family and the people I 've worked with I 've had interactions with people from all around the world, from different educational and cultural backgrounds, social standings, religious and sexual orientations.
Both boast a very high immigration population from all over the globe. A well-known name for the concept of multiculturalism in Canada is the “cultural mosaic”. In America, multiculturalism is frequently called a “melting pot”. The metaphor of the cultural mosaic implies a mix of different religious and ethnic groups who live harmoniously in a society. In the United States, the situation is quite different.
Everyone is treated equally under the law despite their gender, race, beliefs, traditions, etc. Anyone is allowed to maintain their own ethnic beliefs and still be able to freely participate in Canadian events and traditions with no restrictions. The country has established rights for everyone guaranteeing them freedom of speech, equality, and more. According to the National Post, “…Twitter was alive with self-congratulation this week, with news that Canada had been ranked the second-best place in the world to live.” Because of this, Canada is the epitome for other countries as it shows how people of diverse racial backgrounds can work and live together under the law in peace.
I don't agree with The Honourable David Lam in his article "Pulling Together" where he remarks that in Hong Kong, people are rude and loud, but in other parts of the world, like Canada, people don't accept that behaviour. I think that Canadian people are equally rude and loud as in Hong Kong. Just how important manners are? However in Canada, minimization of friction between people in Canada is verifiable. Compared to other countries where immigrants feel like they have to embrace the culture in order to become part of it; in Canada it’s the opposite.
Canada can be seen as a civic nation because Canadians come from many different backgrounds but choose to live together under similar political beliefs and values. This has allowed Canadian culture to be very diverse. In spite of this diverseness majority of the culture comes from the U.S. Most movies, T.V. shows, magazines, and radio content was made in the