Candie 1948 Case Study

290 Words2 Pages
In this case, there is not a contract between Candie and Delilah. There was no real agreement between them. Candie placed the sweater on sale and Delilah responded to the ad and wanted to purchase it. Candie replied to Delilah that there was a mistake made in the advertisement, and as far as we know, Delilah never responded. If, a court would say there was an agreement or contract based on the facts, Candie has a defense and would be able to have the contract rescission. Her defense would be a mistake of fact. (Miller, 2013) The mistake being that the word “slot” was mistakenly left out of the advertisement.
The UETA does not make anyone use electronic forms, agreements, or contracts. The act is for those that agree to do business electronically.

More about Candie 1948 Case Study

Open Document