ipl-logo

Capital Punishment In Lewis Vaughn's Contemporary Moral Arguments

1482 Words6 Pages

The morality of the death penalty is a huge debate in philosophy, and even the political system. This serious topic is controversial and has two main sides; there are abolitionists, which are “those who want to do away with capital punishment,” and there are also retentionists, that want to “retain the death penalty as a part of a system of legal punishment” (Vaughn 348). Both retentionists and abolitionists have strong believes on whether or not capital punishment is just. In the book, Contemporary Moral Arguments by Lewis Vaughn, there are readings by Kant, Cassell, and Stevenson that further describe the differences and sides to the death penalty. In addition, many ethical theories such as deontological and consequential ethics can side …show more content…

A consequentialist compares the good and the bad to see what is morally correct. Considering this topic has many pros and cons, a consequentialist can side with whichever side they believe is a lesser evil. A consequential abolitionist claims that the death penalty is not a better deterrent than a life without parole, therefore the death penalty should be abolished. However, a consequentialist retentionist says that capital punishment benefits our society because it prevents future crimes. They believe that potential criminals will not commit the crime because they are afraid of their …show more content…

If someone is willing to take away someone else’s life, then they need to be willing to give up their own and have consequences. I am a retentionist, and agree with Kant when he states that the criminal deserves to be punished; however, I do not agree that the death penalty is a stronger deterrent than a life without parole. If a criminal has the mindset to kill, they will not be worried about their consequences. I also do not agree with Kant’s retributivism. Although at first thought an ‘eye for an eye’ mentality seems reasonable, how would someone steal from themselves, or who would be the innocent person to rape the rapist? In addition, I agree that there are things that need to be changed in the system, and there needs to be less

Show More
Related

  • Essay On The Cost Of Death Penalty

    571 Words  | 3 Pages

    Cost of the Death Penalty When it comes to the topic of the death penalty being cost effective. Most of us will readily agree that the death penalty is the most expensive, that it’s a financially impractical punishment for convicted murders. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether capital punishment with one execution is more expensive than life a sentence without the possibility of parole, Others maintain that since many law enforcement officials consider that it is an effective deterrent against homicides and a sufficient use of taxpayer dollars. My own view is that those convicted of capital punishment should be sentenced to life imprisonment without getting any parole because it is more cost effective.

    Read More

  • Gideon V. Wainwright's Violation Of Capital Punishment

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    After spending countless hours discussing the criminal court system in class and familiarizing myself with the content of Justice Hands’ quote, I have come to a conclusion that ties together a collection of opinions. The death penalty is an arbitrary and ineffective method of punishment that should only be used under one circumstance; if the defendant has been unequivocally found guilty of the murder he committed and would rather succumb to the death penalty than spend the rest of his life in prison without parole. There have been numerous cases throughout the years that have taken place where a defendant was denied his fifth and sixth amendment right to a lawyer and fair trial, and was left with no choice but to hold himself to deliver his own testimony. These circumstances can dramatically influence the outcome of a trial since it creates an unequal chance for the accused. For example, in both Gideon v. Wainwright and Argersinger v. Hamlin, both defendants were denied their right to a counsel.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Capital Punishment In Truman Capote's In Cold Blood

    1512 Words  | 7 Pages

    Being on death row often prolongs the pain for the inmate. They spend their time in prison fearing the inevitable which for them is death. Today, we live in a society that is very divided on this issue. There are many in support of the death penalty, suggesting that it acts as a positive deterrent against future crime. There are also many

    Read More

  • The Rescue Defence Of Capital Punishment By Steve Aspenson

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    This paper will serve to show that capital punishment is not, in fact, ethically permissible. I will argue this by explaining the government’s duty to its people, and how capital punishment is indeed a violation of these prima facie duties. 1. The government has a duty to protect its people from harm (including murder, abuse of power, etc.). 2.

    Read More

  • Abolish The Death Penalty In Texas

    760 Words  | 4 Pages

    These arguments can be supported and solidified by the cases of Andre Thomas and Anthony Graves. Those who wish to abolish the death penalty may begin by arguing that

    Read More

  • Retentionists Argumentative Analysis

    329 Words  | 2 Pages

    I think that the Retentionists argument is the most persuasive. Retentionists are in favor of keeping the death penalty. For example, Figure 12-5 references deterrence and that with the implementation of the death penalty, offenders will not commit crimes. Death is the ultimate punishment and a concept that most people fear. Imposing this as a penalty is the maximum price for your crime.

    Read More

  • Coretta Scott King The Death Penalty Is A Step Back Analysis

    754 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the essay “The Death Penalty Is a Step Back” the author, Coretta Scott King expresses her feelings about capital punishment and states reasons to back up her argument that the death penalty is both a racist and immoral practice. King believes that capital punishment is immoral and illegal, and that it by no means serves as a deterrent for other possible criminals. The author then further talks about how there have been numerous incidents where the mistakenly convicted is put down in the name of American justice. King then argues that by sentencing someone to death, one is assuming that the person convicted is not capable of rehabilitation. The

    Read More

  • Summary Of Igor Primoratz's The Ethical Life

    1318 Words  | 6 Pages

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with two separate arguments about the death penalty in his academic book The Ethical Life, fundamental readings in ethics and moral problems. In the first argument, Justifying Legal Punishment, Igor Primoratz gives us substantive reasoning that opts favorably toward the necessity of the death penalty. Contrasting Primoratz, Stephen Nathanson, through An Eye for an Eye, provides us with an argument that hopes to show us that capital punishment, like murder, is also immoral and therefore, unjust. By the end of this essay, I intend to show that while capital punishment may not be the easy choice for a consequence and punishment to murder, it is, however, the necessary one.

    Read More

  • Consequentialism And Abortion

    1828 Words  | 8 Pages

    Consequentialists say that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. They believe that whether the action is right or wrong depends solely on its consequences. In order to follow this, we first figure out what is valuable or good and then we MAXIMIZE it. If the consequence of the action produces the maximum amount of good for the greatest number of people, then the action is right. Consequentialism is controversial.

    Read More

  • Jeffrey Reiman's Arguments Against Capital Punishment

    1646 Words  | 7 Pages

    The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty In Stephen Nathanson's An Eye For An Eye?

    901 Words  | 4 Pages

    Death Penalty is a very ominous punishment to discuss. It is probably the most controversial and feared form of punishment in the United States. Many are unaware, but 31 of the 52 states have the Death penalty passes as an acceptable punishment. In the following essay, I will agree and support Stephen Nathanson's statement that "Equality retributivism cannot justify the death penalty. " In the reading, "An Eye for an Eye?", Nathanson gives objections to why equality retributivism is morally acceptable for the death penalty to be legal.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Death Penalty

    1145 Words  | 5 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of The Death Penalty

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even though it is true that taking the life of another is not right, it is even truer that the punishment should fit the crime. The death penalty is an exercise of justice that promotes retribution for crime and moral punishment for those who choose to take human life. Also, it prevents society 's worse offenders from re-offending, and it provides justice for the victims whose lives were cut short without a second thought. To better understand why capital punishment is a justifiable act, Kant 's theory gives a clear and logical understanding of the eye for an eye approach. Additionally the utilitarian view also explains why capital punishment is justifiable in regards to comfort for the victim 's family and prevention of re-offending.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech: Why The Death Penalty Must End

    767 Words  | 4 Pages

    Why death penalty must end ‘’An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,’’ said Mahatma Gandhi. The execution of someone who has possibly done a crime is an inhuman act. Death penalty is hypocritical and flawed. If killing is wrong, why do we kill when a criminal has done the crime of killing someone? In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money.

    Read More

  • Essay On Harsh Punishment

    1048 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

    Read More

More about Capital Punishment In Lewis Vaughn's Contemporary Moral Arguments

Open Document