Money can eliminate the struggle of money problems, which most likely outcomes to unhappiness, additionally, money can buy happiness as long as one gives some of the money away. Proponents argue causes of happiness that are attained because of money or wealth is most importantly because of where the money is being spent. Being wealthy or having a fortune is not always about spending ones money on themselves. In fact, some of the wealthiest people on earth are most likely to become miserable because of how they tend to spend their money. In “Can Money Buy Happiness?” Flynn (2013) writes that Elizabeth Dunn and Michael Norton have proved evidence that spending money on others and by helping them is how money buys happiness.
By developing distinct social lessons — vintage money, new cash, and no cash — Fitzgerald sends robust messages about the elitism jogging during every strata of society. The first and maximum obvious organization Fitzgerald attacks is, of path, the rich. However, for Fitzgerald (and certainly his characters), putting the rich multi function group collectively could be a top notch mistake. For a lot of the ones of modest means, the rich seem to be unified with the aid of their money. However, Fitzgerald well-known shows this isn 't the case.
Without trade partners because of their currency, and by condemning new ideas that could advance them as a society, we can see a militarized camp with a sluggish and practically useless economy that is slowly digging its own grave. In Athens, the economic reforms brought on by Solon bolstered the economy, raising the purchasing power of money, encouraging sustainable economic growth. Going even further, he held the view that “if the freedom of each is the concern of all, then the polis must protect everyone against personal enslavement, even to the extent of ransoming (…) Athenians who had already spent many years as slaves in other lands” (Vlastos, 1946). Essentially he went so far as to find enslaved Athenians in faraway lands to bring them back from economical enslavement. The second of his reforms brought an early form of democracy, giving the power of juror to the common man.
In the Michael Moore's movie Capitalism: A Love Story, there is great use of pathos. An example of pathos would be, In the film the author highlights the idea that the concept of the so-called American dream embodied in the limitless devotion to capitalism and how it was responsible for the economic decline. Considerable deterioration of life conditions of average Americans and global crisis, Michael Moore asserts that capitalism presented by deceitful politicians. As the ideal social order that allows everyone to realize one’s desires and potential turned out to be an powerful weapon. That weapon made possible a situation when less of 1% of the American population accommodates its financial resources and in this way they rob others and earn money on their grieves.
The characters in these books fight against the injustice to make their world more fair. Characters from The Outsiders experience injustice and fight against it. Greasers experience injustice in behalf of the fact that they are poor. This is confirmed with: “Greasers can’t walk alone too much or they’ll get jumped, or someone will come by and scream ‘Greaser!’ at them…”(Hinton 2). Greasers are judged for being poor, but the rich kids aren’t judged when they break the law for fun, when the greasers can barely obtain enough money to eat.
The fact that they keys are only given to poorer kids make it easier for the regime to persuade them to go to war, using the promise of a better life as a bargaining chip which the kids won’t hesitate to receive. The regime uses this to control the boys, and “put them in a trance” (page 101) so that they will be good, fearless soldiers who are not afraid of dying. This form of oppression is blatant abuse of authority, and completely unjust behavior that essentially condemns poor kids to
“Short everything that guy has touched, I want half a billion more swaps”...”I am going to try and find moral redemption at the roulette table” (The Big Short). He feels morally wrong for being a part of the debauchery but, he is also trying to do what benefits him which is make money and exact a little revenge on the corporations that target these unsuspecting people. Despite the financial gain he feels wrong for his part in the events but his actions show that he is doing what is morally good for him and the clients he represents and ends up making millions off these same people he is betting against. In the end Mark must be convinced by Vinnie into selling their shorts by reminding him of his fiduciary responsibility to their investors, ”Clients want to talk to you about pulling their money, It’s now or never mark, you’ve got to sell” (The Big Short). By every account these actions would be considered highly immoral, but the egoist perspective would say that the act of not selling the shorts would be an immoral act so he is clearly acting morally by getting rid of the
The Real Life Monopoly People say money makes the world go round. This phrase seems to sadly be true in today's economy. It is being run by CEOs, and the upper class society that seems to find tricks in every nook and cranny they can get. Even popular childhood games like monopoly force us into playing into income inequality. This is a serious ongoing issue that is affecting the lives of many citizens trying to live the "American dream".
Surely, there are a few bad apples among the lot, but in all that is good, there is bad. Immigrants are not responsible for gun violence, economic failure, or US’s intolerance for their fellow man. Xenophobia is still present in American society, because its citizens are unable to let go of the old ideas of isolation. It will cost a lot more to get rid of immigrants! How about putting all that time and resources to good use for America; come together as one, and make America great
As industry exponentially grew after the Civil War, the need for labor and materials to power newly-created manufacturing giants caused new social classes to form: the rich corporation owners and the poor laborers. Unfathomably rich Robber Barons, or plutocratic American Capitalists, dominated the economy and industry and profited from the slave-like work of millions of poor laborers during this time period. Moreover, the poor working class and the rich further divided by distribution of wealth. Therefore, exploitation of capitalism widened the gap between the rich and poor classes of America, and both newly-formed classes developed reasons for the change. During the period of industrialization, between 1865 and the early 1900’s, corporate
The era that makes this possible, and gives America the potential to be a great country, is the Progressive Era. The Progressive Era was the era that destroyed many things that the big industrialist liked having (i.e. monopolies) (Whitehead, 2016). The changes in the Progressive Era were not a result of the big industrialist changing their minds, because they like having things that were latter banned in the Progressive Era. The robber barons got rich by cheating the poor people who were either their worker or their customer.
Nobody wanted to listen to him then, but when the stock market did crash, it was all Hoover’s fault. "The real trouble was that the bellboys, the waiters, and the host of the unknowing people, as well as the financial community, had become so obsessed with the constant press report of great winnings that the movement [stock market investment] was uncontrollable” (Blumenthal 51). Hoover thought everyone was so obsessed with the stocks, that something bad was certain to happen. The majority of Americans were determined that they would double their money the next day from their stocks. He even tried to go to the big companies and ask them to warn their people about the dangers of the stock market.
In Andrew Carnegie’s essay “Wealth,” he believed that he had a responsibility to spend his money on something to benefit the greater good. He believe that the rich should distribute their wealth responsibly to benefit society. One of his quotes say, “The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced.” Carnegie starts off talking social Darwinism, the issue of inequality and how and if he could fix it. Capitalism ensured that the smartest and most talented people would rise to the top. This would make them become significantly wealthier than anyone.
Hopely, that will force people who are already stealing from taxpayers to simply pay like the rest of us. Finally, there will be a Constitutional law protecting the American people from the clutches of greedy multi-billion dollar companies fixated on only gaining a profit. The days of giving jobs that would normally be given to foreigners given to American people will create more jobs and generate more money at the bottom for lower class citizen. This should be the 28th Amendment, an amendment protecting Americans, creating more jobs, and enforcing the rules and regulations already set by men before