In the post-Mao era, the communist regime had craved for the civilization development, which were the material (wuzhi) and the spiritual (jingshen). As the civilization of materials could reflect the growth of the state while the spiritual civilization could represent the state had the ability to control itself. The spiritual development includes the citizens' behaviours, social stability and the sense that commit to the civility and virtues. The legitimacy current regime had always emphasized the importance of quantitative components that used in the strategy of governance. The modernization and economic development in China had gained an upper place in the world order by promoting civilization which aimed at enforcing the correlation between the population quality (suzhi) …show more content…
The middle class had a few characteristics, including enjoying a comfortable economic situation, a high standard of education level and had a politically liberal orientated. Generally, the middle class had the right conscious that not to be exploited by the government. They embraced a bigger conscious to fight and preserve their rights in order to gain the autonomy and independent from the state. They demanded the liberalism and interfered the government policies. Samuel Huntington (1993) believed that economic modernization might increase the growth of urbanization and the rising of middle class, which could unleash a constellation of social forces to pine for democratic governance. In addition, the middle class tended to be revolutionary in its early development and they became conservative over time. However, the landscape of middle class in China was not the same as the Chinese middle class remained conservative all the time, as they did not ask for the autonomy and independent from the
The middle class consisted of people who worked 9 to 5 jobs, and were able to afford entertainment. Meaning that this was the first time children were able to start actually living what we consider today as childhood, now that they don’t have to work in factories (“Impact of the Great Depression on Family and Home”1). However, during the great depression many middle class workers lost their jobs or had to work more hours for less money. Robbing these children of the freedoms they were previously given. Unfortunately, many children were pulled from school so they could get jobs to help provide for the family, some were sent away to live with other relatives, and many ran away (“What Were the Effects on the Children of the Great Depression?” 1).
The common people consisted of middle class, peasants, and artisans who had to work hard to be able to pay the heavy taxes. While these people are working hard to pay the heavy taxes their voice went unheard politically. Middle class people were successful but because they
Although the middle class had more wealth, property, and education, they were given the same social and political rights as the peasants. In document four, The French Revolution by Albert Mathiez, the author showed that the working class were more sensitive to their lack of rights that prevented them from acquiring political power. They were unhappy about their inability to gain power in the government because the ideas of the Enlightenment were implanted into their minds. The document also stated that only the middle class started the Revolution because the peasants were incapable of doing the most basic things like reading or writing, let alone starting a revolution. This excerpt proves that the working class, who were given no opportunities to choose or be a part of their government, were a cause of the French Revolution because of their desire for political power.
The working class, including industrial workers and farmers, experienced unemployment and poverty firsthand. They struggled to find jobs and were laid off leaving them to eventually lose their homes. Middle-class individuals often faced unemployment as well. This led to a decline in their financial stability and an overall decrease in their standard of living. However, some middle-class families managed to maintain a certain level of comfort.
The cause that lead to the Progressive era was the Gilded Age. Industrialization during the Gilded Age is what lead to urbanization and new ideas in the Progressive era. The Progressive era was a period of social activism and political reform across the United States during the 1890s-1920s. During this period, the Progressive movement was focused on eliminating corruption within the government. It covered social reform issues relating to female suffrage, education, working conditions, unionization, urbanization, industrialization and child labor.
A new social era came into existence due to the unequal distribution of wealth. There was a difference in the way the different classes viewed culture and slavery. The middle class of this time was made up of people who owned small factories and stores. Since they did not have the protection of wealth, they feared
Being they were living in such conditions, the inflation hit them hard. The big businesses had to cut back and not pay as much to their employees. During this time period, even the people in politics came from families were part of the “solid middle class” (Mowry 255), as they had attended college, and were financially
Looking at these qualities of each dynasty, the Legalist and Confucian philosophies generated contrasting roles of the government, one of which brought education and social mobility, and the other brought the prohibition of education and strict
The middle class was composed of businessmen and other professionals. As the Industrial Revolution grew, the more powerful these individuals became. Individuals and groups formed new libraries, schools, and universities because there was a need for education probably due to the increase in population.
China’s economy increased since its trade extended to even Africa. The trade also helped shaped Afro-Eurasia into discovering a culture and helped show other parts of the world. Eventually, people felt a need to have some kind of government representative. Different countries began developing their own identity and were coming together simultaneously. There was much activity and participation in the world.
Elites’ taste were commonly adopted by people with lower income and status through the process of refinement which created the middle class. However, the middle class had to work in order to purchase all the material objects like tableware, china, carpets, and clocks. They earned extra income from household manufacturing. Thus, the middle class dealt with textiles and quilting to earn money and comfort. They were used to create family clothes or exchanged work with other people to create a strong fabric used to create summer working dressses.
The birth of the middle class. a. Comfort vs. wealth. Small business owners, managers, etc. 3. Agricultural workers. a. Industrialization helped to automate farming, but “middle-men” along with consumers were profiting rather than the farmer.
Marxism and feminism are two sides of a coin. Encarta reference library defines Marxism as “a theory in which class struggle is a central element in the analysis of social change in western societies”. Feminism is defined as a recognition and critique of male supremacy combined with efforts to change it. Marxism is an economic and social system.
Any activity which is repeated over a long period becomes a powerful force even if there is not much accomplished by each separate activity. That small amount of time when compounded over time, there are huge differences that result, but these results depend on whether there have been changes in activities. In China, capitalism sprouts were economic features of the 16th and 18th centuries characterized with a class society where upper class grabbed the surplus created by the low class through labor power for their one luxurious consumptions and to fight each other. Culture and propaganda have always been one of the cores of the ideological control system of the communist government of China. It is a control technology based on the understanding
The durability of China’s regime has been a controversy among scholars and the experts of China’s issue. Some predicted that China’s regime would crumble following the collapse of the largest authoritarian regime (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics). Somehow China survived and began to grow; however, various explicit problems happening in China are devastating. Bruce Dickson argues that people may underestimate China’s adaptability. Although the reaction of the government is slow, it can adapt many political or societal changes and reclaim its legitimacy.