Careless Driving Offences

Law enforcement agents are should behave to a standard that is greater than the average civilian. Police brutality comes from an abuse of power granted to the police. Police brutality is often drawn on by overreaction in certain situations drawn on by panic. Police using excessive force in the United States is a crucial dilemma and must be stopped.

People should not agree with the Author because minor laws are more of guidelines and when people get caught they are fined for doing it. Readers who agree with Trippett might say something along the lines of the number of people that they see speeding everyday. An example of this is on freeways or highways. People are often seen speeding in these

For instance, someone is cutting people of on the highway and going over the speed limit. Certain people will be very angry and jump to conclusion. David will want us to understand that maybe this person has an emergency or a convincing reason to why he is speeding. The main idea of this speech is that being educated is not just going to school to learn math, science, and

This had become a more frequent problem as more citizens refuse to wear seatbelts. This choice can end up in a death for not only the careless seatbelt user, but also for a innocent person involved in the accident. Mandating seatbelt use will stop these unnecessary fatalities around the

Stop Injustice, End "Stop and Frisk" Do you want to feel discriminated against? No? If you do not want to feel discriminated against then stop "stop and frisk". "Stop and frisk" is a law that caused much trouble for the people of the United States and the people of planet earth. This law allows police and officers to stop blameless people and frisk them.

Second important factor could be a cause of car accident is speed, Exceeding speed limit causes a series car accidents can lead to death, with exceeding speed the driver lose control of his car and then occurs an accidents. People should understand that speeding not going to save much time for them, instead; they will increase the danger to themselves. Over speeding is against the law and many people are selfish in respect that they find the speed ticket is irritating. People exceed speed for many reasons such as being late, show off, or for fun, they put their own lives and other people lives at risk.

Because the cost of being incarcerated is extremely high, the due process orientation requires that the state eliminate all doubt as to whether constitutional procedural safeguards were violated. In order to control law enforcers, there must be a cost for violating the rules. Thus, in order to ensure that police officers will comply with the law, it is argued that the cost of releasing all suspects whose rights have been violated will be a high enough cost to motivate law enforcers to obey the law when they perform their duties. According to the due process orientation, corrupt police officers will cause the crime control orientation to

An example of this would be operating an automobile. The substance abuse impairs the individual to focus. The third principle is due to repeated substances, legal issues happen. An example of legal issues may be stealing due to the reoccurring substance use. Finally, continued use of substances without further acknowledgement of the problems, for example fighting with a spouse (Levinthal,

Cars on the self-government will allow, for the most part, solved the problem. As a general rule, road rage comes from people who believe the other driver insulted by any of their actions. The most common reasons for aggression, this cropping, preventing overtaking and fighting for a place in the parking lot. Cars with autonomous control move the most safe and effective, which helps to eliminate most of the negative emotions that arise from the driver at the

In addition, they are applied in the transport sector, for example, speeding or driving without insurance. An example of its application is in the R v. Williams 1WLR 588 case in which the offence of casing death while driving without a license was regarded to be one of the strict liability. As a result, a maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment was given in addition to the 14 years sentence due to the offence of reckless driving leading to death. It has, however, been argued that strict liability is quite harsh and can potentially lead to the creation of injustices.

An example of race in the article “The Disproportionate Risks of Driving While Black” is when the article says “Violence is rare, but routine traffic stops more frequently lead to searches, arrests and the opening of a trapdoor into the criminal justice system that can have a lifelong impact, especially for those without the financial or other resources to negotiate it (Sharon LaFraniere/Andrew W. Lehren, p.2).” The quote clarifies that in LaFraniere a distinction in race is extremely clear and that there should be changes in light of the fact that the solid disparity in race is bringing about issues with police and upheaval of viciousness. Likewise, the article “The Disproportionate Risks of Driving While Black” displays race when the article says “In the seven states with the most sweeping reporting requirements—Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Nebraska, North Carolina, and Rode Island—the data show police officers are more likely to pull over black drivers than white ones, given their share of local driving-age population (LaFraniere and Lehren, pg. 2-3). ”

Driving while intoxicated or DWI as it is usually called is a serious offence hence punishable under law. If caught under the strict DWI law, one can face trail and undergo rigorous imprisonment and probably for this reason people booked under DWI law look for a qualified Fairfax VA DWI lawyer who can save them from the wrath of the court and social embarrassment. There could be no excuse for driving a vehicle when intoxicated and neither should the culprit give silly excused to the officers. Useless arguments with learned officers could further complicate the matter and make it difficult for even the most experienced attorney to save you.

When a driver hits a pedestrian, they are supposed to take responsibility and remain at the scene of the accident until the police arrive. However, hit and run accidents are an extremely common occurrence. Hit and run accidents are taken seriously. People who leave the scene of an accident may be required to pay a hefty fine. They may also be required to spend time in jail.

A highly effective approach to the problem of distracted driving is to make its penalties as severe as DUI penalties. This dangerous driving behavior, which has become a national pandemic, refers to objects or activities (either internal or external) that cause a diversion in the driver’s attention. As a result, the driver switches focus to a non-driving activity—such as using a cellphone, eating a meal, or looking at a billboard. The current fine imposed by the State of California for using electronic devices behind the wheel is only $20, the lowest in the country, for a first-time offense (Bundy and Raja,1). Contrast that with a first-time DUI offender who faces a six-month jail time and a heavy fine of up to $3,000.

When one thinks of a public health issue, often times individuals immediately think of topics revolving around certain diseases or areas of health that are difficult to counteract such as obesity, smoking, or eating healthy. However, public health issues not only involve areas that affect the biological side of ones health, but also the overall well being of others lives, including life and death. These lives are not affected directly due to specific genetics or actions caused by other biological affects but due to the physical actions and habits of others and ones self. This is recognized in the public health issue of distracted driving, specifically texting and driving. Through the increased concern of texting and driving, individuals are