Brainless.com: Rhetorical Strategies in Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Do we depend on the Internet to answer all of our questions? Nicholas Carr, an American author, wrote “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published in 2008 in The Atlantic, and he argues about the effects of the Internet on literacy, cognition, and culture. Carr begins his argument with the ending scene of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. Carr believes that we depend on the Internet more than just looking up the answers in the book ourselves. He is trying to prove that our generation is consumed by the Internet.
He explains how this is crippling our culture as whole not knowing what someone could say and causing people not to speak their mind. He goes on to say telling us how we protect ourself. We have to learn that people disagree and it doesn't matter if you are a everyday, day-to-day citizen or an elected
In Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451, he makes many predictions that are applicable today. Some of these predictions are negatively impacting society, which is creating many problems for the people who do not want to follow what the government is enforcing. In the novel the people think that their TV’s are their family, they do not have the capacity to think and judge the rules
Relative to today’s society, Brave New World identifies the addiction to technology as a deceitful and bitter happiness. Huxley successfully predicted the outcome of technology because, like the society in Brave New World, the populace’s conformity of technology has resembled the declination of individualization. Beneficially warning the dangers of uncontrolled technology, the cautionary work of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World expounds the dehumanization of society through the addiction of media and stimulants as an escape. The novel Brave New World asserts that technology is a society functional necessity because the advances of technology have proven crucial. The society in Brave New World is heavily based upon technology as it is a factor of everyday living.
In Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451, he makes many predictions that are applicable today. Some of these predictions are negatively impacting society, which is creating many problems for the people who do not want to follow what the government is enforcing. In the novel the people think that their TV’s are their family, that they do not have the capacity to think and judge the rules that the government made, and
(TS) In Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury’s overall message is when people have an obsession with technology they separate themselves from the real world. (MIP-1) Technology keeps you separated from the real world, preventing you from opening your mind to learning. (SIP-A) With their obsession of technology the people have forgotten about books and ideas that leads to learning. (STEWE-1) Montag is so furious with Mildred and her thoughts about books. She does not understand the meaning and knowledge they hold.
Chris Hedge’s article, “Our Country Is Lost Believing in What It Sees on Screens, and We Are Going to Pay a Nasty Price for It,” highlights the negative influence electronic media has on society. The author provides a realistic insight into the negative effects of electronic media. Hedges states, “It is the electronic image that informs and defines us. It is the image that gives us our identity. It is the image that tells us what is attainable in the vast cult of the self, what we should desire, what we should seek to become and who we are” (Hedges, 4).
In the article "Your iPhone is Ruining Your Posture- and Your Mood," by Amy Cuddy, She Directly get to her argument "SmartPhones are ruining our posture. And bad Posture doesn 't just mean a stiff neck. It can hurt us in insidious psychological ways. "What she means by the quote is that, posture affects us in sneaky ways that we won 't notice it until it happens. In the article Cuddy also claims her arguments multiple times.When reading the article she claims her argument in many different ways trying to make sure the reader understand.
Wattenberg writes a compelling, factual book about the possible reasons the youth of America do not live out their civil duties. However, I think Wattenberg overanalyzes the small details and forgets to look at one common denominator. As a young person in America, it is extremely relevant to mention that most millennials have no faith in the American political system. We have seen the system fail our families, and our neighbors, and our friends. Over the years a bureaucracy has formed, and the American people are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the course that our country's political agenda is taking.
Technology with the power to let all your desires come true within seconds shouldn’t be allowed. People will lose their senses and start doing things they’ll regret later in life or make a bad choice. Stephen King didn’t write about the aftermath of him changing his life. We just know that he was happy with his choice. If technology continues to grow it would lead to a device similar to the word processor in this story and the world would be chaotic.
By describing the birther movement as “wacky” and “disquieting”, it is clear that Kolbert is against their views and finds it disturbing that they believe so strongly about it. She emphasizes how much the Internet has developed throughout the years to the point that people are able to search up anything they want to, and yet it is as if the facts they receive do not matter anymore since they continue to believe rumors. The Internet has also developed to the extent that individuals are also able to post and share their own opinions online, and she is irritated that most people nowadays would take those opinions as facts just because they agree with their views, even if it is false, therefore leading to the start of rumors. Kolbert’s own views are made clear in the beginning of her article when she described the birther movement with a frustrated tone, and she hopes to evoke the same frustrated feeling in her primary audience in able to start convincing them to agree with
To continue, Heroes of Our Age written by Peter h. Gibbons is an article that basically tells the reader, we had heroes then, now we don’t, and we will be doomed. To me this article is very contradictory and I disagree with almost every one of his “statistics” and “opinions”. I feel that they were not well sought out.
It was written by a man named Nicholas Carr and it attempts to prove to the reader that our access to search engines, such as Google, are making us lazy in looking for answers. This has lead to people trying to find the fastest way to do things or find the “shortcut” in a problem. By looking for the quickest, most efficient solution, the article insinuates that we are becoming “stupid” by using search engines because the process of searching for an answer helps to stimulate intelligence. The overall argument being debated is whether Google is making us dumber because of the fact that it gives us so much information at our disposal, it makes reading multiple textbooks to find the same answer that we could “Google” in ten seconds irrelevant. In short, the article argues the theory that; if we are not improving our minds and stimulating our intelligence by researching for solutions, we are becoming dumber by having a search engine do it for
Lesson 1, Activity 1 In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, author, Nicholas Carr, describes the how complex the information age and believes that the internet weakens reading concentration our civilization. Thought the internet provides advantages of immediate access for searching, Carr feels the internet is decreasing people’s ability to read information on a deeper level. I do not agree with his point of view. I do not believe that your capacity to concentrate decreases by using the internet. For example, Carr supports a blog article, from Bruce Friedman, which believes the internet alters mental habits and has the ability to loose reading focus.
Nicolas Carr, an author and researcher, insinuates that people who use computers and the internet are becoming more shallow human beings and that this technological tool, despite its advantages that are applauded by many, is harming society as a whole. Carr has discussed these thoughts in his book The Shallows, on television in an interview with Stephen Colbert, and in an article in The Atlantic entitled “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” While Carr believes that the internet has its place and that it has been extremely helpful to him as a researcher and writer, he also believes that the internet encourages multitasking and boosts superficiality. I share these same thoughts with Carr. While the internet has been extremely helpful in producing a more efficient and fast-paced environment, it has at the same time produced challenges and weaknesses in our society, like multitasking and frivolity. Multitasking is a standard way of life in today’s society.