Case Brief Gottwald Vs Sebert
Gottwald vs. Sebert was a court case that has to deal with the breaking of a contract. The defendant, Kesha Rose Sebert, is a songwriter as well as a recording artist. The plaintiff, Lukasz Sebastian Gottwald, is a music producer who was suing Sebert and her mother for breach of contract and defamation. The initial contract, which began in 2005, between Sebert and Gottwald stated that Sebert had to provide six albums for Kemosabe/Kasz Money, Inc., a music label. Sebert’s mother, however, felt that the two of them were not being paid fairly. Sebert and her mother attempted to get out of the agreement so that the two could be paid for the effort they put in. Gottwald denied the Sebert girls’ pleas to let Kesha out of her contract and to give her mother back her publishing. Her mother threatened to expose him for sexual and drug related abuse of Kesha unless he complied. …show more content…
Gottwald denied all of the allegations. On February 19, 2016, the request for a preliminary injunction on behalf of Kesha and her mother was denied. A month later, Sebert appealed the court’s decision. In April of the same year, the judge dismissed Kesha’s allegations because the assaults occurred eight years prior, therefore falling outside of the statute of limitations. Four months later, Sebert dropped her charges against Gottwald due to the emotional distress caused by the
Tinker Vs Moines Case Brief
712 Words | 3 PagesAssignment 6: Tinker v. Des Moines Ana M. Greenwood University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Tinker v. Des Moines In December 1965, thirteen-year-old Mary Beth Tinker was a high school student in Des Moines, Iowa. During that time, a group of adults and students gathered to declare their opposition to the conflicts in Vietnam. To protest, the group agreed to wear black armbands during the Christmas break (Iannacci, 2017). Tinker and a group of students decided to take this protest and armbands to school to school as well.
Steinberg V. Petta, 739 N. E.: A Case Study
336 Words | 2 PagesA. Castro is likely an “owner” of the dog because the injury took place after he allowed the dog inside his house, and took care of Puccini when he gave her a treat and bowl of water. A person is considered an owner of an animal, with or without the permission of the legal owner, if that person voluntarily assumes responsibility of an animal, or exerts a level of control over that animal. Steinberg v. Petta, 501 N.E.2d 1263, 1265-67 (Ill. 1986); Beggs v. Griffith, 913 N.E.2d at 1234; Docherty v. Sadler, 689 N.E.2d at 334. A court will not exclude a person from ownership because of the short contact with that animal.
Procedural History Of Goetz Case Brief
696 Words | 3 PagesProcedural History: Goetz, defendant, was indicted by a Grand Jury on January 25 1985, for criminal possession of a weapon in third degree, possession the gun during the shooting, two counts for fourth degree criminal possession of a weapon, and possession of two other weapons. The Grand Jury also indicted him for attempt to the following, murder, reckless endangerment, and assault. He was dismissed for the charges of attempted murder and those that came from the shooting. On March 27, 1985, a second Grand Jury indicted the defendant for four charges for attempted murder, four charges of assault in first degree, one for reckless endangerment, and one for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree on the grounds that new evidence became
Summary Of Morgan V Sate
782 Words | 4 PagesCitation: Morgan v Sate, 537 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1989) Facts: James A. Morgan, the appellant, who at sixteen was diagnosed as organically brain-damaged and brain-impaired, murdered the elderly woman with whom he was employed to perform manual labor. Morgan is described as a teenage alcoholic, who since the age of four sniffed gasoline on a regular basis.
Case Study: Gideon V. Wainwright
325 Words | 2 PagesGideon V. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799 (1963) is the case I have chose to brief. According to US courts website “Clarence Earl Gideon was an unlikely hero. He was a man with an eighth-grade education who ran away from home when he was in middle school. He spent much of his early adult life as a drifter, spending time in and out of prisons for nonviolent crimes. ”The Petitioner within the case was Clarence Earl Gideon.
Gagnon V. Scarpelli Case Brief
777 Words | 4 PagesIn the case, Gagnon v. Scarpelli, respondent Gerald Scarpelli pleaded guilty in July 1965, to a charge of armed robbery in Wisconsin. Therefore, Scarpelli was sentenced to 15 years in prison; however, Scarpelli's sentence was suspended, and he was placed on felony probation for seven years in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Public Welfare. (Leagle, 2017) After signing an agreement specifying the terms of his probation, Scarpelli was awarded a travel permit, which allowed him to return to Illinois, under the supervision of an interstate compact that he resides in Illinois while on probation with the Adult Probation Department of Cook County, Illinois.
What Is The Supreme Court Case Of Eisenstadt V. Baird
148 Words | 1 PagesIn 1967, William Baird was arrested after giving away vaginal foam to a 19 year old woman following a lecture at Boston University about contraceptives and over-population. At the time, in Massachusetts, it was felony offense to disburse birth control methods to unmarried men or women. Eventually, Eisenstadt v. Baird was heard in the United States Supreme Court in 1972. In a 6-to-1 judgement, the Court ruled against the Massachusetts statute, but it was not in aggreeance with the due process of Griswold v. Connecticut, instead it was the Equal Protection Clause that was the deciding factor as reported by Justice William J. Brennan.
Us Vs Schwimmer Court Case
574 Words | 3 PagesThere were many court cases that were discussed in class regarding the mob versus the individual. The most important ones were the United States v. Schwimmer, Roe v. Wade, Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, and Brown v. Board of Education. In all but one of the cases above, the Mob (the government) used its power to stop the individual from pursuing their American dream. The individual was right in all of the cases because they had the right to express themselves and pursue their dream; and the government had to right to stop them from following it. Starting with the Schwimmer case, the individual was right because the government was not giving her a valid reason as to why they were denying her citizenship.
Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study
589 Words | 3 PagesGideon v. Wainwright Clark, 1 Gideon v. Wainwright: The Right to Counsel Amber Clark Liberty High School 2A Gideon v. Wainwright was a Supreme Court case involving Clarence Earl Gideon, a man who received felony charges in the state of Florida for breaking and entering to commit a misdemeanor offense. The importance of this case lies in the Constitutional questions it dealt with, such as a citizen?s right to counsel, and the resulting decision that gave the right to counsel to all, at any court level. Gideon?s case was argued on January 15th, 1963.
Case Study: Moncrieffe V. Holder
1033 Words | 5 PagesIn 2013, the Supreme Court case Moncrieffe v. Holder refuses a Board of Immigration Appeals to removal from the United States of a lawful permanent resident based on a long term criminal conviction related to sole possession of small amounts of marijuana. The case finally made it all the way to the Supreme Court, which is considered a rather technical question of the interpretation of the U.S Immigration laws. Local police departments have long been accused of profiling Hispanic, African-Americans, and other minorities of race in law enforcement activities, including run of the mill traffic stop. Critics fear that immigration enforcement by state and local authorities will lead to increase of racism. Many Americans have shown concerns with the implementation of racist discrimination of the U.S immigration laws by state police agencies and local authorities.
Reduction In Force Case Study
505 Words | 3 PagesYour district must implement a Reduction in Force (RIF) based on declining enrollment and budget cuts. You have recommended a list of teachers from your school to the superintendent. One of the teachers on the list had previously filed an EEOC suit against you alleging discrimination regarding a department chair’s position that she was not awarded. You know that she will allege retaliation as the basis for her layoff.
Case: State Of California Vs. Scott Lee Peterson
716 Words | 3 Pages"The State of California versus Scott Lee Peterson (Case number 1056770, 2005)", was an interesting case. This case was interesting because Laci was a very beautiful and seemingly young, friendly, and happily pregnant woman with lots of friends. Her husband, although attractive, had a kind of macho tough guy womanizer type of persona about himself. It is hard to believe or fathom someone being so cruel as to kill their pregnant wife, regardless of their marital problems. Laci came up missing on December 24, of 2002, the day before Christmas.
Who Is Kristen Gilbert Mental Suicide
1437 Words | 6 PagesShe attacked a federal witness and earned a charge on that also. Court's record showed Kristen had suffered psychiatric episodes. He
T. L. O. Case Study
393 Words | 2 PagesT.L.O. Is Tracy Lois Odem. He went to Piscataway High School in New Jersey. She went to school one day and was searched by officials of her school because she was suspected for having cigarettes. The administrators found cigarettes, marijuana, and a list of people who owe her money. She was charged with possession of marijuana.
Gratwick V. Johnson Case Analysis
1665 Words | 7 PagesIn 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.
More about Case Brief Gottwald Vs Sebert
Tinker Vs Moines Case Brief
712 Words | 3 PagesSteinberg V. Petta, 739 N. E.: A Case Study
336 Words | 2 PagesProcedural History Of Goetz Case Brief
696 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Morgan V Sate
782 Words | 4 PagesCase Study: Gideon V. Wainwright
325 Words | 2 PagesGagnon V. Scarpelli Case Brief
777 Words | 4 PagesWhat Is The Supreme Court Case Of Eisenstadt V. Baird
148 Words | 1 PagesUs Vs Schwimmer Court Case
574 Words | 3 PagesGideon Vs Wainwright Case Study
589 Words | 3 PagesCase Study: Moncrieffe V. Holder
1033 Words | 5 PagesReduction In Force Case Study
505 Words | 3 PagesCase: State Of California Vs. Scott Lee Peterson
716 Words | 3 PagesWho Is Kristen Gilbert Mental Suicide
1437 Words | 6 PagesT. L. O. Case Study
393 Words | 2 PagesGratwick V. Johnson Case Analysis
1665 Words | 7 Pages