Mark Ching Business Law 18 CRN 41226 Brief Assignment People v. Simpson, (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 854 [76 Cal.Rptr.2d 851] Facts: A warrant was issued for a search of the home of Richard Simpson. Officers set up a surveillance of the home on March 27, 1995, Mrs. Simpson left the home at 10:15AM to take her son to school. Upon returning home Mrs. Simpson was detained by Office Conzachi. Once Mrs. Simpson was at the surveillance site a sheriff’s deputy made a call to Richard Simpson informing him that his wife had been in an accident and he needed to respond to the scene to make arrangements for the vehicle. Leaving the residence Mr. Simpson was stopped and detained by officer Conzachi. Officer Conzachi asked Mr. Simpson if there were any guns on the property. Mr. Simpson says there is one gun under his mattress. The gun may or may not be loaded. Mr. Simpson admitted the gun is a .380 caliber automatic. Officer Conzachi is informed by Mr. Simpson that there is on child and a nanny still in the home along with 14 Rottweilers which are attack dogs. Orange County Animal Control is sent to the home to secure the animals and a search was conducted on the home. The gun was located along with 67.24 grams of marijuana. Mr. Simpson is placed under arrest. Procedural History: …show more content…
Simpson about the gun to ensure the safety of fellow officers in preforming the search. September 6, 1996, Richard Simpson was sentenced to 2 years in state prison for possession of a fire arm by a felon [PC12021(a)(1)]. September 24, 1996 Appeal was filed with the 4th District Court of Appeals. July 24, 1998 Judgement was affirmed. September 3, 1998 Richard Simpson petitions for Supreme Court review. November 23, 1998 Supreme Court denies review of
Title: Chimel v. California Date/Court: United States Supreme Court, 1969 Facts: This case deals with Ted Chimel, who they suspected robbed a local coin shop. On September 13, 1965, several officers from Santa Ana came to the home of Chimel with an arrest warrant for his expected involvement in the burglary. The officers arrived at the door and identified themselves to Chimel’s wife and asked if they could come into the home, she agreed and showed them into the house. While in the house the officers waited 10-15 minutes until Chimel came home from work.
Defendant was pick up nearby within a short period of time after the incident. Defendant is a black male, 33 years old, 5 feet, 8 inches tall, and was wearing shorts and carrying a red and blue striped shirt. The victim was driven to the location to see the defendant, who was standing with police officers, still shirtless, with his hands cuffed behind his back. Victim hesitated in identifying the defendant until one of the police officers held the striped shirt over the defendant’s chest, at which time she identified him as her
• The defendant (Mr. Brown) was not under the influence of a controlled substance but I (Officer Reed) noticed strange behavior of the defendant (Mr. Brown). • Upon opening the door to his home the defendant (Mr. Brown) fled from the front door in which Officer Reed and Officer Malloy pursued the defendant (Mr. Brown). • The controlled substance was located inside of baggies on the kitchen table. • The weight of the controlled substance was 1360.8 grams.
On March 27, 2012 police officer Morgan Stubble watched Dennys Rodrigues commit a traffic violation. The officer pulled over Rodrigues and proceed to issue a traffic warning. The officer then asked Rodrigues if he can walk his dog around the vehicle. The dog alerted the officer of contraband
Clarendon County, South Carolina — Briggs v. Elliot: Began in 1947 when Reverend Joseph Albert DeLaine wanted free bus transportation for his three children. Initially targeting equality and not integration, Marshall visited and in 1949, 20 plaintiffs demanded equal treatment across the board in transportation, buildings, teachers' salaries and educational materials. The case was named Briggs after the first plaintiff in alphabetical order and Elliot was the chairman of the school district. There were 47 black students in a class, to 28 white. There were no bathrooms or electricity at the black schools.
In the Riley v. California, there are two cases. In the first case, the defendant is David Riley. Riley was stopped by police due to the traffic violation. Then, police also find that Riley’s license had been suspended. Police impounded his car and search in the car.
People vs. Tuner Case Analysis Background Brock Allen Turner was a nineteen-year-old star athlete, a freshmen swimmer at Stanford University who was admitted in the fall of 2014 on a swimming scholarship. On January 17, 2015, he attended a party at Kappa Alpha fraternity house where he met the victim, twenty-year-old women who later identified as Emily Doe, her sister and their friends. Turner and the victim both consumed alcohol at the party. Shortly after the midnight of January 18, 2015, Tuner and the victim left the party and the victim was split up from her friends. The victim made a couple unintelligible phone calls from 11:54p.m to 12:28 a.m with her friends, then later on passed out behind a nearby dumpster outside the fraternity
On 05/06/17, at 11:43am, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was dispatched to 523 S Wayne Ave on a dog on dog or cat attack, no known owner. I arrived at the location and was met by Columbus Division of Police (CPD) and complainant Raquel Fuentes. I asked what happened; Ms. Fuentes stated that she was taken part in a community event by assisting with neighborhood clean-up with her dog (small white terrier) when a brown/white Pit Bull came out of nowhere and proceeded to attack her dog. With the assistance of passerby they were able to get the brown/white Pit Bull away from Ms. Fuentes dog.
On August 22nd, 2009, the police pulled David Leon Riley over for driving with expired license registration tags. Due to Riley’s license being suspended, the policy, through their policy, required his car to be impounded. In addition to impounding the car, they are also required to conduct an inventory search to ensure that the vehicle had all of its components at the time of the seizure, to defend against future liability claims. It also serves as a way to search for hidden contraband. During the search of Riley’s car, the police found two guns, arresting Riley for possession of firearms.
In People v. Fuller, 1. On February 20, 1977, Fuller and another person broke into four vans in a car lot and took their spare tires. An officer observed them rolling tires into their car and approached them. Fuller and his accomplice got into their car and fled. While fleeing, they ran a red light and hit another car, resulting in the other driver’s death.
P alleges that MOS searched him on the street then he was taken to Mel’s apartment. Defendant MOS Peinan states that he was executing a search warrant at the location which obtain after confidential informant buys and P was the subject of the search warrant. MOS Peinan states that he observed people about to exit the apartment then MOS entered the apartment. Defendant MOS Peinan stated that P was part of the group arrested. Criminal charges were, later, dismissed Third incident (10/10/2008) – P alleges that he was outside when MOS approached with guns drawn and ordered into a van.
-Grissom v. People, 115 P.3d 1280 (Colo. 2005) -Facts: “In 1999, Grissom was present at a dice game between Darrick Love and Shante Cannon. Love eventually won the game, but became angry when Cannon refused to pay him. Grissom later agreed to help Love find Cannon to collect the alleged debt. In the following days Grissom drove Love to several locations in search of Cannon. Approximately one week after the dice game, Cannon was fatally shot near the motel where he had been staying.
The police officers arrived at Ms. Dollree Mapp’s home, looking for a bombing suspect who was believed to be staying with Mapp. Officers knocked at her door and demanded entry. After placing a call to her attorney Mapp decided not to let law enforcement enter her home. (Landmark Cases) After a few hours, the officers returned to Mapp’s home with what they claimed was a search warrant (Landmark Cases); while, Mapp still wouldn’t allow them entrance; they used brute force to gain entry to the home. After the officers were inside of the house, Mapp grabbed the paper from the officers, and she was handcuffed “because she had been belligerent”.
Orenthal James Simpson, commonly called O.J. Simpson was a former Hall of Fame football player. O. J. Simpson was tried on two counts of murder after the deaths of his exwife, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman, in June 1994. On October 3, 1995, O.J. Simpson was found not guilty of murder. The case began on June 20 and lasted over eight months.
A Great Trash Novel Come to Life June 12th, 1994, bodies of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman were found stabbed to death. The bodies were in the front yard of Nicole's condo 875 South Bundy Drive in Brentwood. OJ Simpson, famous football star, Nicole's ex-husband was on his way to Chicago when the bodies were found. OJ was notified the next morning with little reaction, stating he would be on the next flight back to Los Angeles. Returning home, people piled in front of his home.