In theology class this year, I watched the movie The Case For Christ. The movie is set in the 70s and about a husband, who is a journalist, and wife who are atheists. Something significant happens to change how the wife, Leslie, thinks, and she questions her beliefs before converting to Christianity. Lee, her journalist husband, feels like his wife is lost, so he searches for a way to prove to her that God does not exist. Throughout his research, Lee struggles to accept the evidence piling up before him and refuses to believe God exists and loves him. In the end, the movie is about his journey from skepticism to faith. The movie is well done and credible while showing how both Leslie and her husband feels, and it is an overall good movie. I feel the movie was well done, and I like the way the scenes were portrayed. Unlike many religious movies, The Case For Christ wasn’t tacky and garish in showing Lee’s transition. His internal struggle throughout the movies, caused by his belief in hard facts, was portrayed from a more realistic light than most religious movies. In other movies, it would’ve seemed less real, but I liked the way he was working on another case at the same time. I think the other case about the so-called “cop shooter” helped add weight to the movie; it even …show more content…
I feel the movie was portrayed well, and I like some of the people the Lee cited. The movie was also able to show Lee and Leslie’s struggle in a credible way, and it managed to show how both sides felt too. I could feel and see why Leslie changed and that she truly wanted to share her discovery with her husband. It was also an overall good movie, which I would definitely recommend; I for sure wouldn’t mind watching it again. On a final note, the movie precisely shows the transition from skepticism to faith of an everyday man and his
Lee uses literary devices like setting, character, and conflict to transform and change these characters. The setting of the black church scene and the context of the setting are used as the building blocks of the conflict in this scene. Since the time of the story is the 1930s, there is a great deal of a racial divide. So many places exclude blacks and many places exclude whites.
Throughout literature, many characters take the role of a Christ figure, resembling Jesus Christ. Along with other similar characteristics, a Christ figure is a martyr who sacrifices himself for the betterment of those around him. Prime examples of this archetype include the characters of Phineas, R.P. McMurphy, and Lucas Jackson. Ultimately, a Christ figure may be sacrificed for the betterment of those around him.
In Chapter II of The Gnostic Gospels, “One God, One Bishop”, Pagels outline how the Orthodox Christians seek to exclude the Gnostics with a creed that confirms one true God. Pagels intent is to describe how both religions differentiate in their meaning of how God shows his sovereignty. The creed was to help identify the Orthodox from the Gnostics “by confessing one God, who is both “Father Almighty” and “Maker of heaven and earth” (28). The Gnostics claim the Orthodox Christians worship a false God because of their “all-good” God creating a fallen world. Through discovering texts in history, Pagels support a claim from Marcion (a dualist) who believes there are two different Gods.
Freedom of poverty and individual rights ultimately what Mexican-American cultures strive to obtain in earlier times, according to Viramontes. Although this contains accuracy to an extent, today’s Hispanic American culture fight against stereotypes and hidden oppression of full individual rights. Remedification of potential and hard work is dismissed in this novel, due to Mexican-American’s job status and minimal education. This oppression often leaves Mexican-Americans to keep living in this lifestyle, obvlious to keep working and hopefully achieve grounds to move out of poverty. In the novel, Under the Feet of Jesus, Helena Maria Viramontes emphasizes the physical labor Estrella and her family go through, and how this work reshapes their
Elaine Pagels uses The Gnostic Gospels to consider the relation between gnostic teachings and what would become orthodox teaching. Pagels uses both texts to analyze the theological differences in terms of issues of religious authority. The orthodox and the Gnostics had very different ways of understanding what constituted truth, as they had incongruous ideas about who was entitled to preserve and teach that truth. The theological meaning of Jesus ' death and resurrection, the importance of apostolic succession, the position of women vis-a-vis men in the early Church, the question of whether Jesus and the apostles after him had passed on a secret teaching in addition to the teachings known from the New Testament--these are some of the thorny
Vanhoozer, Kevin, Charles Ansderson, Michael Sleasman, eds. Ordinary Theology: How to Perused Cultural Texts and Interpret Trends. Terrific Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2007. Ordinary Theology offers the conversation starter, "How would we decipher society?" Seminary understudies and ministers work to see how to peruse Biblical writings.
In Helena Maria Viramontes’ novel, Under the Feet of Jesus, Estrella starts off as angsty and confused, but then shifts to a state of contentment and understanding, caused by life experiences. These character traits are revealed through the selection of detail, figurative language, and tone. Initially, Estrella is immediately characterized as “very angry” when she finds Perfecto’s “foreign” toolbox. She uses a tone of confusion that illustrates her unfamiliarity with the objects in the tool box by using words such as “funny-shaped”, and using a simile comparing her confusion with the tools to the alphabet which Estrella “could not decipher”.
Aylin Reta 88729977 ARTH 1306 Christ with the Symbols of the Passion Christ with the Symbols of the Passion is a work by Italian painter Lavinia Fontana, its medium is oil on panel and it was executed on 1576. In this piece we see, what seems to be, Christ after he was brought down from the cross. He is sitting at the center of the piece with multiple angels besides him. The color palette seems dark and obscure as well as the overall mood of the piece. He is surrounded by symbols that are significant to the process of His crucifixion such as the cross, the crown of thorns, a whip, and is also surrounded by three angels.
It gives such an in depth perspective of someone who suffers from this disease, and shares it in a way that makes others understand it; rather than judge like many people are prone to do. Frankie and Alice also shows that with the help of others, it is possible to somewhat defeat this disorder, by cohabitating with the alter egos. This movie gave all of us an interesting insight to the world of those who have DID, and it is a movie each person should
The way it explores these themes has been applauded by critics and reviewers worldwide, as it sheds light on the systemic racism and the lived experiences of Black individuals in America. As a critic of the movie, I find the ending of the movie to be unrealistic. After all of the tensions and injustice shown throughout the movie, the ending seems to provide a simplistic and optimistic resolution to the complex issues it addresses. It seems too quick to be able to jump to a happy ending when Khalil's murder goes unpunished and the deep-rooted issues of racism persist. However, as a viewer, the movie was brilliant in its ability to spark conversations and create awareness about the ongoing struggles of racial inequality in society.
The word “critical” often conjures the incorrect image of negativity. If the Four Gospels are to be analysed critically would this study find loopholes only? This need not be the case, as the Four Gospels, and the Bible as a whole, has withstood the test of time. As a stand-alone text, the Bible has proven its accuracy in its portrayal of events, its authorship, and its date of writing. Though scholars have tried to use both textual and literary criticism to discredit the Four Gospels, there are an equal number of scholars, using these same tools, who have proved that the Four Gospels have an accurate portrayal of events.
With controversial subject matter, spectacular acting, and a timeless and relevant plot, audiences truly will get hooked to this film and not want to remove their eyes from the screen. People will either be touched by the ending or they will be left hanging, all depending on perspective, but either way it is something that will affect them and leave them thinking. Maybe the audience will even wonder what their personal “rosebud” is and what it means to
One reason that this movie is not a great movie is because the movie implies that all cops are abusers to their spouses. The movie porters that a majority of cops are abusers and stalkers toward their current or former spouses. In the movie it show how Beth’s ex-husband Keith tries to control every aspect of her life. Keith threats several times that he will take their child (Ben) away from Beth and that there is no judge in the county that will disagree with him. Keith makes this threat more and more as Beth and her child spend more time with Logan.
Apologetics at the Cross: Holistic and a Healthy Apologetic Human being are Holistic, embodied being that thinks, believe, desires, and imagine. Where as in the New Testament the heart is used to refer to the center of a person’s whole being. A Healthy Apologetic that speak the truth through love and provide much more than just claims of evidence, because facts alone do not fuse a Healthy Apologetic. Smith describe three methods of viewing the fundamentals of human being: Humans are thinking beings, Humans as believing being, and Humans as desiring beings.
The Trinity gives the viewer a colossal portal to view the world, as Masaccio would have seen it in renaissance Italy. This spectacle shows the beautiful “elaborate” (Kloss, Lecture 13, 20:07) painted detail of a fictional multi leveled architecture presumably a chapel or a cathedral with emissive barrel vaulted ceilings; that is set over a skeleton set upon it’s burial crypt, that would be seen at ground level on this massive 22’ fresco, the skeleton which has been obscured over the years was rediscover in the last century (Kloss, Lecture 13, 22:16) I think Masaccio had some symbolic meaning on the ideology of death which could lead to an explanation as why it was covered. Above the tomb perched upon an “illusionistic platform” (Kloss, Lecture