Some people believed that curfews would not have help the greasers, but extra people believe that it would help them. All around the world parents have to deal with misbehaving children, but curfews can fix that. According to parents in the article “Are Public Curfews Fair?”, its states that there should be no law about curfews,
Although others believe that texting while walking shouldn 't become illegal because there are other ways to solve the problem, many other ways have already been tested and proven ineffective. That 's why texting while walking should become a law. In conclusion, texting while walking has become a serious problem and there should be a law put in place to solve it. Texting while walking should become illegal because thousands of people are dying and becoming injured because of this, they are endangering others on the road, and many people won 't stop until a law is enforced.
Typically, we consider the problem to be with illicit drugs but not for drugs that are over the counter or even prescribed by doctors. Created with good intentions, the zero-tolerance policy law, was, in fact, was not entirely thought out which ultimately lead to it having adverse outcomes within our school systems. When we send our children to school, we want to make sure it is the safest environment for them to brighten their futures and expand their horizons. We do not want to send our children to a situation where they can face potential exposure to illegal substances or potential weapons, which is why the zero-tolerance policy was developed. It was primarily designed to make schools a drug free environment.
There are no studies to show that these drug test are going to help the drug problem. We need to find something that will help the drug problem in schools without violating the student and parents privacy. According to Sifferlin (2015)¨The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released a policy statement on Monday saying it opposes randomly drug testing students because there’s not enough evidence to show it’s effective, and because random testing can damage relationships between students and their schools. It’s also a possible infringement on privacy, the group says¨ (para. 2). Why create this space between teachers and students, coaches and athletes, parents and children, all for a simple drug test?
They may believe: a kid should not be aloud to have a gun, a kid should not. Be aloud to walk around alone, and a kid should not be aloud to dress in overalls when they are a girl. Others may think the children disrespected Arthur –Boo– Radley. However they knew nothing about him; all they knew with the stories they were told. It wasn 't until the end of the book where they found out who he really was and form their own opinions about him.
Later in the story, it says : "I'm afraid so. One of the original uses of these nurseries was so that we could study the patterns left on the walls by the child's mind, study at our leisure, and help the child. In this case, however, the
From my own personal experiences, some unruly children only respect a firm spanking with the law prohibiting this practice of parenting it can cause children to go down the wrong path because they don’t have the proper respect for their parents which is where children are supposed to learn respect for an authoritative figure. As the snippet of the comment from Allison, 2014 would suggest it is necessary to spank a child this is evident when the text states “Many of the parenting books that dismissed spanking as wrong pushed that a parent should reason with a child. However, science has proven that due to brain development, it is impossible to reason with a four-year-old.
A good spank will snap the child back into reality, the child will know why he/ she got spanked and will be too afraid to do it again; however spanking should be used as a last resort when all fails. Children are supposed to respect and obey their parents and it is the parents’ duty to take charge and make sure that their doing just that. However we all know that that isn’t always trust. Some time talking or taking away their cell phone might not always be that effective.
A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.
Principals may have vast authority in a school, but they do not have the same amount of authority as police officers do. A principal giving a student a Miranda type reading would be out of their jurisdiction. Students do not need to speak during this time, and many do not, therefore the principal does not need to extend their power to that of a police officer by reading a student their Miranda Warning. The Miranda Warning was created for informing criminals of their rights upon the time of their arrest, not for students.
Child Soldiers should not be prosecuted, but should be rehabilitated. These are all the reasons why these children should not be prosecuted. Why I think these children needs to go to rehab is because that they are too young and they are not even mature enough. People who prosecute Child Soldiers Might be insane furthermore, children are not even an adult they might be influenced by drugs and think it is good. unless you are an adult, then you may need to be prosecuted, other than that children are too young to go to rehab and needs to understand life.
In "Counterpoint: School Children Should Learn To Defend Themselves Against Bullies," the thesis states “Dealing with childhood bullies is part of growing up. Children must learn to cope and defend themselves,” but what about those who cannot learn to defend themselves? This is where the adult that plays the role of the bystander needs to intervene, so that it is not a lack of action on their part. Bullying will never be completely over, but bystanders have the option of choosing to be hurtful or helpful, and they can choose to prevent bullying by being helpful. When it comes down to bullying situations bystanders need to choose to be the solution instead of the problem, because it is one or the
The book could help to teach people like the resource officer, that what they did was wrong and unjust. This book has a strong impact on teenagers and children, and they are the one who have to be taught the difference between someone doing bad, and someone being accused of being bad because of who they are. As we see in “To Kill a Mockingbird” the children are influenced by their parents views as is all children. When “He(Cecil Jacobs) had announced in the schoolyard the day before that Scout Finch 's daddy defended niggers”(pg. 99). This child Cecil Jacobs probably overheard his father talking about Atticus defending Tom Robinson and made a comment
Introduction: Social norms are the base templates which guide our behavior everyday. Social norms entail an expected behavior based off of those norms, and that we will conform to those expectations on a regular basis. These norms rise from our evolution of social dynamics. As the people in a society consistently interact with each other and other components of society, people begin to form a certain set of expectations on how the interactions and situations should proceed. As a large portion of society begins to conform to this standard, the certain behaviors that one would have in a particular situation will start to be considered as normative behaviors.