ipl-logo

Summary Of Everett Vs Rogers

218 Words1 Page

The efforts Edina Broward made to research about her stolen painting will probably considered as diligent efforts which prevent statute of limitation from starting to run. Ms.Broward tried to find her stolen painting by many means. First of all, The police was notified by her as well as a private investigator was hired to help to find the stolen painting. Similar to Everett v. Rogers, where the owner of stolen painting informed the police and was going to hire private investigator.
Furthermore, Ms.Broward wrote many letters describing the painting to art museums, some of local art dealers and auction houses in different periods as well as $25,000 was offered by Ms.Broward to acquire useful information related to her stolen painting. Comparing to Everett v. Rogers, where no award was offered by the owner, Ms.Broward showed a real desire to locate her stolen painting by offering $25,000. …show more content…

She was not aware of its existence before she was told about them. Similarly, in Everett v. Rogers, where the owner did not know that IFAR existed before he reported the theft to them.
Finally, both of the owner in Everett v. Rogers and Dr. Warren did not inquire about the stolen paintings before they purchased

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of The Case Of Tammy Lou Fontenot V. Taser International

    311 Words  | 2 Pages

    Tammy Fontenot is the person charged with administrating Turner’s estate and filed suit and became the plaintiff. The City of Charlotte settled with Tammy Fontenot for $625,00. But the claim against

    Read More

  • Civil Court Case: Horton V. California

    247 Words  | 1 Pages

    Case: Horton v. California Citation: 496 U.S. 128 (1990) Year Decided: 1990 Facts: After obtaining a warrant for stolen items from an armed robbery, a California police officer searched petitioner Horton’s home. The officer had described both the weapons used and property stolen in the affidavit for the search warrant, but the Magistrate issuing the warrant only authorized a search for the stolen property. Even though the police did not discover the stolen property, weapons matching the officer’s description were found in plain view and seized. Horton ended up being convicted of armed robbery after a motion to suppress the seized evidence was denied by the trial court.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Ted Chimel V. The State Of California

    488 Words  | 2 Pages

    Parties: Ted Chimel (Plaintiff) v. The State of California (Defendant) Facts: The Police Officers arrived at the Plaintiff’s house with an arrest warrant for the alleged crime he had committed. The Plaintiff was not at home and his spouse let them in until Chimel return. Upon the Plaintiff entering the house, the police arrested him and request permission to search the house. The Plaintiff denied the request to search the house, but the police officers proceeded to search the house.

    Read More

  • Summary Of R V Lavallee 1989

    1256 Words  | 6 Pages

    Case: R. v. Lavallee 1989: October 31; 1990: May 3 Relevant Facts The appellant, Angelique Lyn Lavallee, lived with her partner, Kevin Rust. The crime occurred in their house.

    Read More

  • Shahar V. Tommie Granville

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    I believe Justice O’Connor’s plurality opinion of Jennifer Troxel et vir. V. Tommie Granville (802-803) was an example of a “good opinion.” The piece was both well-written and backed by appropriate precedent; O’Connor cited Meyer and Stanley v. Illinois, supra, observing, “[The] interest of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children [is] perhaps the oldest of the fundamental [due process] liberty interests recognized by this Court” (802). He additionally emphasized that the Court had not found Granville an unfit mother, nor had the Troxels accused her of being one when the case began. I find the majority opinion of Robin Joy Shahar v. Michael Bowers to be an example of a “bad opinion” for several reasons.

    Read More

  • Mrs. Horatio Van Bliven Research Paper

    189 Words  | 1 Pages

    Mrs. Horatio Van Bliven has staged the theft of her own necklace. Mrs. Van Bliven 's $25,000 necklace was stolen from her hotel room. The room 's window had been smashed and the room torn apart. Mrs. Van Bliven wanted to make it look like someone broke in and stole her necklace. What actually happened was that Mrs. Van Bliven made it look like the room had been broken into.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott V. John F. A. Sandford Case Summary

    961 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1857 the Supreme Court overruled a previous decision by the circuit court of St. Louis County, Missouri. The Case of Dred Scott versus John F. A. Sandford would go down in history as one of the courts most erroneous rulings. This verdict called into question a slaves rights in free states, popular sovereignty and the legality of the Missouri Compromise. Dred Scott had won a previous court battle over his former master John Sandford claiming that he had assaulted his wife and children and that he should in fact be a free man because he had been moved to Illinois and Wisconsin for a time. Since both were free territories he should in fact be free.

    Read More

  • Goldberg And Wheeler Court Case Summary

    331 Words  | 2 Pages

    The court cases Goldberg and Wheeler do not stand for the proposition that only welfare benefits for people in extreme circumstances are entitled to pre-termination hearings. However, this is one situation where cutting off benefits with little or no notice could affect the well-being of the family or person. Any programs that offer they type of assistance people rely on to survive could benefit from pre-termination hearings, not just the welfare program. Welfare is one of the main public assistance programs, although I think housing assistance and food stamps might fall into the welfare category, they are also in need of a pre-termination hearing. In the Goldberg and Wheeler cases, California and New York did not want to give anyone a hearing

    Read More

  • Willingham V. Gilbert Case Study

    241 Words  | 1 Pages

    Together, they pored over clues and testimony. Gilbert says that she would send Reaves leads to follow up, but although he was sympathetic, nothing seemed to come of them. In 2002, a federal district court of appeals denied Willingham’s writ without even a hearing. “Now I start the last leg of my journey,” Willingham wrote to Gilbert. “Got to get things in order.”

    Read More

  • Tom Mashburg's Inventions In The Herald

    108 Words  | 1 Pages

    In March of 1990, 14 pieces of artwork were stolen from the Isabella Stewart Gardner art museum. Out of those 14 one was the Storm another was a seascape with Jesus and the Apostles, and also included a Vermeer and a Monet. This artwork has been missing for over 25 years. A reporter in Brooklyn sought to find these missing master pieces, so he started his own investigation. He acquired a lead, and found himself in a storage locker in Brooklyn 200 miles from the museum.

    Read More

  • The Case Of People V. Mr2d 504

    440 Words  | 2 Pages

    It was Ricky Franklin Smith fourth offense, in which he was known as a habitual offender. He pleaded guilty to a charge of breaking and entering. During his hearing in the Court of Appeals, Smith suggested that he deserve a resentence due to the fact his charges was base upon his expunged juvenile criminal record. The Court of Appeals referred back to the case in People v. Price, 172 Mich App 396, 399-400; 431 NW2d 524 (1988) that suggested that in pursuant to MCR 5.913 when a juvenile record is expunged it cannot be used in a sentencing. Whereas, People v. Jones 173 Mich App 341, 343;433 NW2d 829 (1988) states that an expunged juvenile record can be included in an investigation report and in a sentencing(People v. Smith, 2017).

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court Case Of Roper V. Simmons 543 US 551

    593 Words  | 3 Pages

    In reviewing the Supreme Court case of Roper v. Simmons 543 U.S. 551 (2005), we review the allegation of the violation of the Eighth Amendment in the trial court’s use of cruel and unusual punishment in its sentencing of Christopher Simmons; who was a juvenile at the time of the crime; to a sentence of death. In reviewing the facts of the case, we find that Christopher Simmons, then 17 and a junior in high school, along with Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer, planned the commission of a burglary with the intent to commit murder under the perception that they were minors and as such would be able to get away with the crimes. Upon his capture, Simmons, admitted to the crimes and provided law enforcement with the details of the crimes. Because of his age and the nature of the crime, Simmons was considered to be

    Read More

  • Case Of Fitzgerald V. Lawrence

    1157 Words  | 5 Pages

    On July 15, 2016 the State charged Mr. Lawrence with the assault and theft of Ms. Fitzgerald. On July 16, 2016, Ms. Fitzgerald identified Mr. Lawrence form a photo lineup based on the tattoo on Mr. Lawrence’s right arm. Recently, Mr. Blauer Whistler approached the Parties with information about Ms. Fitzgerald. Mr. Whistler was a paralegal who worked with and dated

    Read More

  • Second Trial Of Ronald Cotton V.

    797 Words  | 4 Pages

    In July of 1984, in Alamance County in North Carolina, an assailant broke into the victim’s – Jennifer Thompson-Cannino – apartment and attacked and raped her. Later on that same night, the same assailant broke into another apartment, attacked and raped a second woman. Jennifer Thompson-Cannino, was a 22-year-old college student at the time. She had never met the defendant, Ronald Cotton, until she picked him out of a line-up as her attacker and rapist. Ronald Cotton was initially convicted based only on the victim identifying him as her attacker.

    Read More

  • Amadio Wich The Crying Boys Analysis

    506 Words  | 3 Pages

    All most they find a driver's license and they know that the driver was 19 years old and his name was don bonello .however It showed a lot of strange fire accidents in Europe . After that he did not fond in the records for the car fire incident and he not found some one had died by name bonello .however some of them they told that his painting no was get fire because of the tools that they used for the painting was different and

    Read More

More about Summary Of Everett Vs Rogers

Open Document