Case Study Jim And Ron

Duty- It was the responsibility of Dick to make sure his master Cylinder was installed correctly. Under the reasonable person test, a resonable person would have made sure the master cylinder was installed correctly. Breech of duty- Dick understood that if he could not break his car in an emergency it could cause damage. Dick also did not have his dog properly placed in vehicle.

Though many agree that the Flint Water Crisis is a result of government failure, some have delved deeper to find out the reasons as to why the government failed in its handling of the crisis. Some individuals have attributed the failure of the government to the ulterior motives of the government officials involved in the crisis. While others have contributed the government’s failure to environmental racism and long standing prejudice. The government’s failure in handling the Flint Water Crisis has ignited harsh critiques from civilians, intellectuals, and politicians. Despite several complaints about the color and odor of the water, state water quality officials assured civilians that the water was safe to drink but privately acknowledged to federal officials that the proper safety measures had not been taken.

By preponderance of the evidence against Mr. B he is guilty of elder neglect. According to the scenario, some psychologists might think that Dr. Y may be acting too early because no one has been harmed yet. Although, just because a someone has not been harmed yet does not justify that someone will not yet get hurt. One question for these psychologists would be: when should

Several people knew about the contamination, and of course they were jailed as well. Stewart Parnell was also seen sending a very bad email, showing that he doesn’t care about his own customers, just the profit. Stewart Parnell is also the cause of the 2008 outbreak of salmonella, as it is

The best defense Borealis would have against Chad 's workers ' compensation claim is proof. Since Dex and Chad were at a remote location Borealis could claim that the "accident" was sustained off the job. Borealis could also state that since it was entirely Dex 's fault that Chad was injured, that he did not receive his injuries on the job, but from an "off-the-job"

The choice of using Charlie Gordon in Daniel Keyes’ book, Flowers for Algernon, for an intelligence altering surgery was unethical and biased. The first reason that Charlie should not have been chosen for the surgery is that it left him and his life in worse condition than when before the surgery. “ I dont want Miss Kinnian to feel sorry for me. Evry body feels sorry at the factery and I dont want that eather

Violations of this law may include disciplinary actions, criminal penalties and fines, and possibly imprisonment. To conduct this investigation, the first step I would need to take is to find out whether HIPAA trainings were conducted though all the staff members at this hospital. Many people violate HIPAA laws without even being aware that they are in contravention. Ultimately, it is the hospital’s responsibility to ensure that their staff members are trained on these laws to ensure compliance, and reduce violations. Although the lack of awareness of HIPAA violation laws is not an excuse, this is also a matter to be taken into consideration before concluding my final decision.

Had Rick apologized for his brash and insensitive remarks and demands, the damage that he had done to his host’s pride would have partially been undone and his answer may have been different. Yet this would not last, Rick has proved himself time and time again that he is toxic to the survival of anyone around him. The acceptance of Glenn proves that Hershell is capable of compassion and is lenient in his demands. If Rick had appealed to him in a way that come across as nonthreatening instead of unleashing his emotional and hormonally unstable wife on an already grief stricken man, he seals his fate on the farm and ensures that he is no longer, by any means welcome there.

The privilege to health care and other services according to the worker’s compensation Act is a worthy aspect whose significance cannot be exaggerated. When an injury is discovered for which money is paid, a suffered worker is titled to associated health care treatment for his or her life span in a causal fashion. In addition, the health care treatment provider may not need to get payment from the suffered one. There are several statements that limit some claim to the health care treatment benefit part of the worker’s compensation Act, for the most part in the shape of the New York Medical Treatment Guidelines. According to the kind of injury; an injured person may be limited in respect of the time length and types of treatment offered.

For instance, a physician might argue that the injuries were not the result of their medical care and that their care followed their medical professional standards. Alongside challenging the element of negligence, physicians might try to prove that the injuries the plaintiff endured were a result of their own negligence ("Defenses to Medical Malpractice", n.d.). For example, the injuries a patient receives can occur if they do not inform their physician their entire medical history. As a result, they can be prescribed medications or treatments that can cause adverse reactions or injury. This is especially true in instances where physicians may try unconventional forms of treatment to care for their

Blame can be defined in this case as a moral failure. Placing blame on

Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Medical malpractice involves negligent care by a physician. The physician has either done or has not done something (neglect) to make a medical situation worse. A patient may come in with what seems to be something that isn’t serious, but it turns out to be worse because all that could have been done was not done. Medical malpractice in some states results in a cap in damages. The elements of this cause of action according to Zachary Matzo are “duty, breach, causation, and damages” (Matzo, 2015).

The oil spill was a terrible crisis, not only for the ocean, wildlife and local economy, but also for the corporate image of BP. I view their image restoration strategy to be ineffective in understanding the social climate of the public’s view, and even less effective at restoring faith in the company. The company chose to seek to avoid blame and focus on corrective action, rather than reduce the severity of the offense of mortify

The client, Chase Robinson, is a 5 year old African American male. The child’s family was referred to CPS after a family friend’s 2 year old son died while being supervised by Chase’s biological mother, Amber Robinson, father, Chance Robinson, and a live-in friend, Anthony Coleman. The case was then transferred to Child Protective Services On-going after Amber, Chance, and Anthony were arrested on first degree murder charges. Chase’s maternal aunt, Octavia Carter, now has temporary custody of Chase and his two younger siblings. Ms. Carter also has 5 children of her own, ranging from ages 5-10.

For many political scientists, the answer to Jon Tester’s victory is simple. After all, incumbents win nearly 80% of the time in the Senate. It can be expected that Tester would fall on the majority side of that break. Still, Montana is a conservative state, and Jon Tester is a Democrat who “votes with Obama 97% of the time”. He, like Obama, loves to spend money gained by raising taxes on hard-working Americans.