1. According to a longitudinal study by Lewis Terman, a high IQ does have some degree of impact on predicting success in life (for example, children who achieved genius scores as children made $33,000 per year when an average income at the time was just $5,000 per year), however, it by no means guarantees it. When Terman looked at the adult success of the children that were scored as geniuses as children, he took the 100 most successful and the 100 least successful and put them into two groups. Group A were very successful as adults and group C were not very successful as a adults (for example more likely to be alcoholics and divorced). He looked at what made group A so much more successful than group C and he noticed the group A had traits such as “prudence and forethought, will power, perseverance, and the desire to excel” and “more goal oriented, had greater perseverance, and had greater self-confidence,” many traits today that are would be described with the buzzword “grit.” The studied demonstrated that while IQ does have some effect on feature success, there are other traits that have a greater impact. …show more content…
The official rationale was that the children were intellectually and/or developmentally disabled (although many were not) and needed to be institutionalized so that they could not “reproduce.” This was part of the “eugenics” movement that took place in the part of the first part of the twentieth century with the goals to prevent people who believed to be “inferior” from being allowed to reproduce in an attempt to “purify” the genetic pool and prevent further generations of people from having disabilities. The children that were kept at Fernald had very few, in any, real educational goals and were instead forced to work if they were able to; as one patient described that they “took” his education (along with his childhood) from
The education obtained by the kids was rudimentary. Not only were the residential schools poor but also abusive. The English training was not adequate. Additionally, the emphasis on the religious practices was great. Most of the young girls were taken from the classes to carry out various duties in the laundry, and the young boys were forced to work in the stables.
The argument developed in Chapter 3 and 4 of the Outliers contends that IQ beyond a point is not a determining factor in success. Gladwell implies that a higher IQ to a certain extent is optimal but once a defined threshold has been achieved, having greater intelligence provides limited or possibly no additional benefits in the attainment of success. An analogy in the book that is used to convince us that opportunity matters more that talent is an example from the studies of Annette Lareau comprised of a group of third graders residing in lower and middle/upper income households. Her studies showed that the middle/upper class students were provided opportunities to cultivate their talent/abilities in a meaningful way along with support and
Lastly, passage three contrasts with passage two in that society believes that high IQ, an innate ability that is out of one’s control, is the determinant in how successful people will be. However, innate IQ only matters to a point and beyond that there is no significant difference between high IQ people and average IQ
They would be putting in effort that could be saved for a race where everyone 's horses are normal and not “better”. Do smart people get their smartness from reading books and practicing? Document 2 says that the IQ of a person is not from how they are raised in a home, but that it’s in their genes. Kevin Beaver states that, “Their reading to you, talking with you at the dinner table and taking an active interest in your
Mike Rose disagrees with the assumption that “Intelligence is closely associated with formal education” (Mike, 247). Formal education does not always measure the level of intelligence of a person. Education as something people can gain not only in school, but every day of their lives. We should be learning from our experiences, and apply this knowledge to our everyday lives. Wisdom should not be looked at as just
Ty Lewis ' life is not a simple one. His parents died in a car accident and his older brother, who he idolizes and tries to take after, is away finishing college. For the time being, ty must live with his aunt and uncle in not exactly ideal living conditions. He has a porta potty in the yard for a bathroom, and he scrubs toilets and bathroom floors for his Uncle Gus ' cleaning business. Things should get better as his brother Thane Tiger Lewis is about to be drafted into the NFL and come into some serious money.
Dweck explains this in better detail when she says, “… the belief that intelligence is fixed dampened the students’ motivation to learn…and made them want to quit after a setback”. She also shows us the other side, when intelligence is thought to be developed, students are exposed to a passion for learning and are more determined with presented with a
In "Blue-Collar Brilliance" Mike Rose Shares his perspective on how education is not Intelligence. He lets us know how growing up he was around a bunch of Blue-Collar workers himself, and how intelligence is not based on the education you have but what you can Develop on your own from just being open minded. He explains to use how blue-collar jobs take a toll on both body and mind. He believes that you don't need to be taught things to develop intelligence that your intelligence comes from within. He shared the different stories of blue-collar workers life that he experience such as his mother and his uncle to help us see that even if you don't have a high education and a college degree you can still become a successful.
Having an opportunity of practical intelligence is important for achieving success because people can change the situation to their desire by using practical intelligence. Even though asserting oneself is also an important requirement to succeed by appealing with confidence, better results of asserting yourself are guaranteed through capability of practical intelligence which is the ability to knows what, when, and how to say. In chapter 4 of Outliers, practical intelligence is mentioned as a key to success. For example, there is a case of Chris Langan and Robert Oppenheimer in outliers that shows the importance of practical intelligence. Even though they both have high IQ, Robert Oppenheimer succeed, but Chris Langan does not.
Malcolm Gladwell insists that IQ is not the determining factor in one’s ability to achieve success because he believes that opportunity and chance play critical roles in one’s journey to achieve success. In Outliers, Gladwell includes Christopher Langan story growing up. Langan has an IQ of one ninety-five, “The average person has an IQ of one hundred… Einstein one fifty” (Gladwell 70). Langan is considered “the smartest man in America” and sometimes “the smartest man in the world”.
Previous times have always based a person’s success to their level of intelligence quotient. Emotional Intelligence, IQ, and Personality help determine the overall human psyche. Although interrelated, each of these three cannot predict the others. Travis Bradberry, in his article “Emotional Intelligence-EQ” (2014), said that one couldn’t simply predict emotional intelligence by their smartness, as intelligence is our ability to learn that is the same at 15 years of age and at 50 years old. Emotional intelligence are flexible sets of skills that we can acquire and improve with practice.
Truth is what they did to those children was cruel. When the industrial revolution started a new way of social division developed in which individuals were members of a socially determined class, meaning the class in which you were born. The educated public people saw themselves as the backbone of the middle class and the people saw themselves as the
It simply doesn’t matter what our IQ is as long as our IQ is high enough. Gladwell explains that IQ has a threshold and that it’s very similar to height in basketball. “Does someone who is five foot six have a realistic chance of playing professional basketball? Not really. You need to be at least six foot or six one to play at that level, and, all things being equal, it’s probably better to be six two than six one, and better to be six three
In fact, when you start looking into it, your talent and your intelligence don't play nearly as big of a role as you might think. The research studies have found that intelligence only accounts for 30% of your achievement — and that's at the extreme upper end. So…what makes a bigger impact than talent or intelligence? And the answer is
The 11+ an IQ test used to determine the type of school a child would attend was highly influenced by psychologist Sir Cyril Burt, Burts research appeared to show that intelligence was largely inherited and could be measured. It was right to assume that a child should then go to a school that suited their intelligence and abilities, although in the results of the 11+ there was a strong suggestion that class had a major influence on the results of the test with middle-class children getting higher scores therefore many more middle-class children gaining entry to the grammar schools. Burts research was later discredited because much if his research had been invented. Although research still showed there was a connection between measured intelligence and achievement in education (Haralambos, M., Holborn, M. 2000). Arthur Jensen (1973) an American psychologist defines intelligence as "abstract reasoning ability" and argues that it is simply a small