Bethel High School District 403 v. Fraser Matthew Fraser, a student studying at Bethel High school, gave a speech at a school assembly to nominate his friend as a candidate for student government. The speech contained many sexual references and innuendos, but no obscene content. Making his speech, Fraser was suspended from Bethel High school for three days. His parents appealed the school's decision and Washington Supreme Sourt agreed the his freedom of speech rights were contravened, the school board appealed the case to the Supreme Court. This case was appealed to the Supreme Court because Matthew Fraser's speech rights were opposed by the school board by suspending him. The Bill of Rights grants every citizen of America the right of freedom of speech, according to Amendment 1 but in this case it was disregarded. So …show more content…
There was precedent from the case of Tinker v. Des Mones Independent Community School District in 1969 when the court said that "that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the school gate". In this case, despite their previous decision, the court sided with the school board. Cheif Justice Burger wrote for the majority and stated that there was a big difference between Tinker case which dealt with a major issue of public policy, whereas the case of Fraser deals with lewd speech in a school. "The purpose of public education in America is to teach fundamental value" wrote Burger he said that the freedom of speech dealing with offensive remarks applies to adults, but the same degree does not apply to the students in a school. Justices Stevens and Marshall wrote a dissenting opinion. Stevens wrote "I believe a strong presumption in favor of free expression should apply whenever an issue of this kind is arguable." In the end the court decided that the school board was correct in order to discipline Fraser about using offensive language in the wrong
The issue before the court was the question, “Was her Fourth Amendment right violated by school
As seen in previous cases like Tinker vs. Des Moines, students have the right to political say, unless it causes disruption at school of students are promoting something that goes against the law. In the case of Tinker v Des Moines the students were not promoting anything illegal but showed their thought on the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands (Tinker). Argued in court by Kenneth W. Starr in the Morse v. Frederick case, he gave the idea that the foundation for school censorship was the case of Tinker v. Des Moines (Morse). The Justices responded back saying, that case was a different scenario as the students weren 't doing anything against the law while Frederick was encouraging the use of marijuana which was illegal (Morse).
Principal Belding suspended Maria for five days and was prohibited from running for student body president the next year. Maria then sued Principal Belding alleging that he had violated her right to free speech protected under the First Amendment. In the courts, the District Court found in favor of Maria, while the Court of Appeals reversed the ruling of the District. This case will soon be heard at the Supreme Court.
The Tinker V. Des Moines had a huge impact on history and school districts. Des Moines was community school district. The Tinker’s were a family that attended it. There were two children from the Tinker family that attended Des Moines and they are John F. Tinker and his sister Mary B. Tinker. They were suspended for protesting.
Jonathan/Oliver: Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser Jonathan: Petitioners: Bethel School District Jonathan: Respondents: Matthew N. Fraser Oliver: Petitioners’ Claim: That punishing Fraser for using offensive language in high school assembly speech did not violate the freedom of speech Oliver: Bethel School District v. Fraser was a United States Supreme Court decision involving free speech in public. Parties of the Case: Bethel School District / Matthew Fraser Oliver: The Bethel School District has an estimated enrollment of over 18,000 students. Jonathan: Matthew Fraser is a 17-year-old senior who attends Bethel High School in Washington.
In the case Bethel v. Fraser, The Supreme Court rules that the school officials have to teach high school student how to conduct civil and effective public discourse. Meaning Francini had every right to punish Murphy off school
Justice Fortas explained the majority opinion of the Supreme Court in the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. One of the main points Justice Fortas maintained was that the right of freedom of speech extends onto the school grounds. Fortas explained that wearing a black armband to school did not cause disruptions to the learning in the school and is a pure form of free speech that is protected in the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. Fortas continued to explain that the wearing of the black armbands to school is protected under the Fourteen Amendment. This amendment prevents interference in the liberties of teachers, students and parents.
The issue in this case was whether school-sponsored nondenominational prayer in public schools violates the Establishment clause of the first amendment (Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale, n.d.). This case dealt with a New York state law that had required public schools to open each day with the Pledge of Allegiance and a nondenominational prayer in which the students recognized their dependence upon God (Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale, n.d.). This law had also allowed students to absent themselves from this activity if they found that it was objectionable. There was a parent that sued the school on behalf of their child. Their argument was that the law violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as made applicable
The principal found two article that he thought were inappropriate and said couldn't be published. Kuhlmeier and her classmates were outraged and brought this case to Supreme Court. Opinion: The lower courts said denying the students from publishing the article goes against the first amendment, no matter how appropriate it is. After this case went the the Supreme Court the lower courts decision was overturned. The Supreme Court's decision came out to be 5 to 3 in favor of Hazelwood School District.
“The students alleged that Westside 's refusal violated the Equal Access Act, which requires that schools in receipt of federal funds provide "equal access" to student groups seeking to express "religious, political, philosophical, or other content" messages” (Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens by and Through Mergens). Many still argue today that Westside 's prohibition against the Christian club, consistent with the Establishment Clause, makes the Equal Access Act unconstitutional.
There have been tons of Supreme Court cases that have changed the lives of high schoolers and students everywhere- one of the most famous being the Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent School District case in 1969. There were three students, John Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt, who decided to wear black armbands to show that they did not support the Vietnam War. The administrators of their school told them that the armbands needed to be removed because they were inappropriate, but they refused, and a huge court case started and they also got suspended from school. According to the students, their right to wear the armbands was protected under the First Amendment, which said that they were allowed freedom of speech and expression. After going through lots of courts, the Supreme Court took the case and agreed that the students were protected.
This case highlighted the First Amendment condemning any limit on free speech. However, during the case proceeding, the Court had dissents for deciding when the government may restrict the First Amendment. The case spread the fact that
Ferguson case violated this amendment. One of the key phrases, delivered by Chief Justice Earl Warren, states, “We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal” (Brown v. Board of Education 1). Brown v. Board of Education and the annulment of Plessy v. Ferguson inspired African Americans and gave the push to start the Civil Rights Movement and fight for what is right.
Per 3 Goss Vs. Lopez Supreme Court Case On October 15, 1975 Nine students were suspended from Central High School from Columbus, Ohio. They had destroyed school property and disrupting students from learning and were suspended for 10 days. One of the students amoung them was Dwight Lopez.
GOSS v. LOPEZ, Supreme Court of the United States, 1975. 419 U.S. 565, 95 S.Ct. 729, 42, L.Ed.2d 725 deals with students that were suspended. The Columbus Ohio Public School System (CPSS) was sued by students. Nine students claimed that they were suspended without being given a hearing before their suspension, or even after their suspensions were over.