ipl-logo

Case Study Of Dollree Mapp's Home In Cleveland

233 Words1 Page

This case happened on June 19, 1961. The case was about police breaking into Dollree Mapp 's home in Cleveland, Ohio without a proper search warrant. There had been information given that a suspect in a bombing case, as well as some illegal bombing equipment might be found at her home. With this information police decided to go to the house and ask permission to enter, when Mapp refused to let them in, three hours later two of the officers came back with more officers holding a piece of paper, they broke down the door. Police found nothing when they raided the house besides a suitcase full of pornographic material. Mapp said the suitcase was not hers and she had lent it to a boarder. She was arrested, prosecuted, found guilty, and sentenced

Show More
Related

  • 106 Wildridge Road Case Study

    158 Words  | 1 Pages

    I responded to 106 Wildridge Road in reference to a civil complaint. Upon arrival, I spoke with Mark and Anna Sanders. Both subjects advised that they paid David Sasser $350.00 dollars to build their son a bunk bed. They advised that Sasser told them that he spent all the money and didn’t buy any supplies. Mark then agreed that he would take Sasser to get the wood that he need, and pay for it.

    Read More

  • Jason Leavitt Case Analysis

    421 Words  | 2 Pages

    State, where the female decoy was robbed. The court determined that the defendant in that case was not entrapped because stole the money from her zipped up purse. However, that case is separated from this case because of the condition that decoy was appeared to be in. The court held that the opportunity Miller was given to commit a crime was not improper; he had a choice not to take the money but he did. The court also denied Miller claim of police misconduct, they found Leavitt did not con Miller into stealing the money.

    Read More

  • Chimel Vs. California Case Study

    455 Words  | 2 Pages

    Title: Chimel v. California Date/Court: United States Supreme Court, 1969 Facts: This case deals with Ted Chimel, who they suspected robbed a local coin shop. On September 13, 1965, several officers from Santa Ana came to the home of Chimel with an arrest warrant for his expected involvement in the burglary. The officers arrived at the door and identified themselves to Chimel’s wife and asked if they could come into the home, she agreed and showed them into the house. While in the house the officers waited 10-15 minutes until Chimel came home from work.

    Read More

  • The United States V. Place 462 US Case Brief

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    Significance: The Supreme Court here expresses that governmental conduct like drug dog sniffing that can reveal whether a substance is contraband, yet no other private fact, does not compromise any privacy interest, and therefore is not a search subject to the Fourth Amendment. Terry v. Ohio permits only brief investigative stops and extremely limited searches based on reasonable suspicion including seizures of property independent of the seizure of the

    Read More

  • Elton Hymon Garner Research Paper

    730 Words  | 3 Pages

    On October 3, 1974, at around 10:45 pm, Elton Hymon and Leslie Wright of the Memphis Police Department were responding to a “prowler on the inside” call. They made the scene and observed a woman in the house next to the intended home of the call. She was standing on her front porch pointing at the house. She advised that she had heard glass breaking and someone was breaking into the house next door. As Wright showed both officers on the scene on his radio to dispatch, Hymon went to the rear of the house.

    Read More

  • Shakel Negligence Case Study

    695 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although, the police officers had a search warrant they had it for the wrong unit which placed a family in danger and they raided the wrong unit in the first place but then raided the right one where they find the evidence but because it was found illegally the judge dismissed all of the evidence against Shakeel “Blam” Wiggins because of the Exclusionary Rule. Now the reason the evidence was dismissed was because there was no specific address on the warrant and this means that an officer cannot just search every unit in the multi-family house until they find evidence against the

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case: The Case Of Mapp Vs. Ohio

    354 Words  | 2 Pages

    On May 23, 1957, three police officers in the city of Cleveland, Ohio knocked on the door of Dolly Mapp and held up a piece of paper that wasn’t the warrant that gave them access inside. The three officers gave Mapp very little information as to why they were there. The real reason they were there was because an anonymous phone tip stated that Virgil Ogletree, a suspect of a recent bombing, was

    Read More

  • Social Media Injustice In Steubenville, Ohio

    588 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Steubenville, Ohio, a sixteen-year-old girl was attending a local high school party with her friends. The girl was more intoxicated than others and refused to go home after the party was shut down. She then joined a group of guys who were going to another party and when they get there, the girl was too drunk to remember anything else. Two of the boys that were with her were Trent Mays and Malik Richmond. Both of them were football players at Steubenville High School, which was a big deal in small town Steubenville.

    Read More

  • Larry Simons Residences Case Study Summary

    342 Words  | 2 Pages

    A New Leaf provides various different services including domestic violence shelters, after school care, and residential care. The Larry Simons Residences (LSR) is a Residential Treatment Center (RTC) for adolescent males and females ages 12-18. LSR follows regulations established by the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Bureau of Residential Facilities (Arizona Department of Health Services, n.d.). Social policies concerning adolescent substance abuse, affect this case. For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 requires coverage for mental health and substance use disorder services (Anthony, Jenson, and Howard, 2016).

    Read More

  • Morris Kent Case

    840 Words  | 4 Pages

    In September of 1961, a woman from District of Columbia had an intruder break into her apartment. While the invader of the home was there, they had taken her wallet, and also raped the woman. During the investigation of the crime, the police had found some latent fingerprints in the apartment. The police then established and processed the prints. The prints were then connected back to 16 year old Morris A. Kent.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Cases: The Mapp V. Ohio Case

    621 Words  | 3 Pages

    Police believed that Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, and demanded entry. No suspect was found, but police discovered a trunk of obscene pictures in Mapp 's basement. Mapp was arrested for possessing the pictures, and was convicted in an Ohio court where she lost the case in fighting her for first amendment rights. Then, Mapp argued that her Fourth Amendment rights had been violated by the search of the officers and got her case taken to the U.S. Supreme Court where she won. At the time of the case, unlawfully seized evidence was banned from federal courts but not state courts, meaning that the evidence found in Mapp’s home was used against her in the Ohio court, but not the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Read More

  • Justice Brennan's Case: The Terry Vs. Ohio Case

    425 Words  | 2 Pages

    (Sifferlen, 1991) The landmark cases pertaining to protective sweeps are Chimel v. California and Buie v. Maryland, which establish limitations when performing protective sweeps (Sifferlen, 1991). In Chimel v. California the police executed an in-home arrest warrant, and during their search incident to arrest, they had Chimel’s wife open up dresser drawers revealing evidence of the burglary without a search warrant (Hall, 2015). This type of search was exceeded the intent of protecting police from harm and therefore was proclaimed unconstitutional (Hall, 2015). Additionally, in Maryland v. Buie an officer seized a red running suit utilized in an armed robbery, however the officer initiated a protective sweep of the home because there were still outstanding offenders from the robbery (Sifferlen, 1991). Maryland v. Buie balances officer safety versus the intrusiveness of the search under the Fourth Amendment by limiting police to scope of a protective sweep to places large enough for a person to hide (Sifferlen, 1991).

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Of Ohio Terry V. Ohio

    885 Words  | 4 Pages

    If the police were to conduct a search without a warrant or consent in this situation, any and all evidence found would be prohibited from use against the suspect in the court of law. This rule is called the exclusionary law, created under the Supreme Court ruling of Mapp v. Ohio (Mapp v. Ohio, 1961), states that any evidence that is illegally obtained during an investigation cannot be used in the court of

    Read More

  • Wolf V. Colorado Case Brief

    584 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before 1948 Julius A. Wolf had been arrested and tried for reasons not stated in the Supreme Court case, but the evidence that was used against Wolf was taken unlawfully, the police had no warrant for his arrest as well as no warrant to search his office. Wolf was able to get an appeal to be tried one more time. In 1948 the trial Wolf v Colorado Supreme Court had begun. It was a very controversial topic because the case was based on the violation of the Fourth Amendment right of protection from search and seizures.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

    427 Words  | 2 Pages

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated… We all know the fourth amendment. It's the amendment that guarantees our safety within our homes and our personal belongings. Yet, how much do you know about the fourth amendment? The fourth amendment is full of history, controversy, and discussion, even in modern day.

    Read More

More about Case Study Of Dollree Mapp's Home In Cleveland

Open Document