Murder in New Mexico and Three Cases that Illustrate how the Statute is Implemented The three cases that I will be looking at are: State v. Contreras, State v. Nieto, and State v. Garcia. To start off I will first summarize the case of State v. Contreras. The case number is 21455. The defendant was charged under the section 30-2-1 along with tampering with evidence and unlawful taking of a car. I will only be talking about the charge of first-degree murder that he is facing not the other charges against him. This case starts off at 10:30 pm. The date was May 14, 1992. A cab was called to pick up a person by the name of Frank. Around 11:00 pm, just thirty minutes later, a couple of men heard a man calling for help. The man was indeed Doran, …show more content…
Once he knew that Garcia was a suspect he went to find him. He went to a house where he thought he would be able to find Garcia. The officer asked the people at the house if they had seen Garcia and they had all said no. Later however, the officer figure out that one of the individuals at the house was in fact Garcia. According to the report it was “approximately seven hours” after the stabbing that Garcia turned himself in. It was on June 8, 1990 that Garcia was charged with second-degree murder. Sadly Garcia was very intoxicated and that controlled his actions during the stabbing. The last case I will be summarizing is State v. Nieto. The case number is 24,787. The defendant’s name is Lawrence Nieto. The date was April 14, 1995. This case begins with Ben Anaya Sr. going up to his cabin to see his son, Ben Anaya Jr., whom he had not seen for months. When Ben Anaya Sr. got to his cabin he noticed things were out of place. The gate was open and there was trash everywhere in the yard. When he got inside he noticed there was trash also inside the cabin. There was also traces of a fire inside. He walk to a bedroom and that was when he noticed his deceased
If I were a juror in this case, I would find Janice Leidholm guilty of first degree murder. In order to meet the criteria of first degree murder, premeditation and deliberation must be needed. Although she was abused by her husband, it is not considered as self-defense because he was sleeping when she killed him. However, is she actually deserves to be found guilty of first degree murder?
On November 19, 1898, Ariel Tritondatter was arrested on the felony charges of first- degree murder and breaking & entering. An arraignment was later held on November 22, 1898, which Ariel Tritondatter was informed about the charges she was faced with. Additionally, Ariel Tritondatter soon entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity Ariel Tritondatter’s criminal trial was set in the Circuit Court with both a jury and a judge called “Syed Ahmed Khan”. The defendant, Ariel Tritondatter, almost didn’t converse throughout the trial, but soon she took a stand to defend herself.
In the Riley v. California, there are two cases. In the first case, the defendant is David Riley. Riley was stopped by police due to the traffic violation. Then, police also find that Riley’s license had been suspended. Police impounded his car and search in the car.
The article by Karen Sternheimer provides some insight into the stats of murder in America. In doing so, the article also highlights some issues with the media today. We learn that the media turned a statistic in way to help themselves instead of properly providing the real statistic. What the media provided was based on a small number of people, but when looked at from a larger pool of people, it can be seen the opposite had occurred (the murder rate had decreased). We also learn that most murder victims are male, specifically, African American males.
Tanjim Alam Ms. Bricker American Literature 3 March 2016 In Cold Blood: People of Kansas vs. The Clutter Family Murderers During the fall of 1959, an event happened that was never heard of before in the city of Holcomb, Kansas. As a city with virtually no crime, no disputes, and hardworking people, Holcomb is an ideal city with honest people. The Clutter family is a family admired by those around them due to their accomplishments and contributions to the community.
He was convicted of first degree murder, three first attempt murder and two different counts of
if you witnessed someone getting stabbed repeatedly would you call the police? for these 38 people who lived in Queens their answer was no. In Martin Gansberg’s story “Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police” he uses pathos to describes how a woman named Kitty Genovese was stabbed three times in three separate attacks on her way home from work while Thirty-eight people watched and didn’t call the police. Gansberg shows how the assistant chief inspector is baffled not by the fact that it was a murder but by the fact that out of the Thirty-eight people who witnessed the murder only one person called the police but only after the murderer had time to stab Kitty Genovese flee the scene and come back three times within a 35-minute time period. Gansberg, throughout the story, subtly creates a what would you do scenario by making readers wish they were there to help because the story appeals to the readers emotions
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated… We all know the fourth amendment. It's the amendment that guarantees our safety within our homes and our personal belongings. Yet, how much do you know about the fourth amendment? The fourth amendment is full of history, controversy, and discussion, even in modern day.
The Eighth Amendment was created to prohibit cruel punishments that the colonists would receive from the British. The British brought colonists over to an unfair trial and then received punishment that sometimes would be death. The writers of the wanted to make sure that the colonists received the fair trial and fair punishment they deserve. The Eight Amendment was ratified in December 5, 1791 as a part of the Bill of Rights. The Eighth Amendment has not been changed since the ratification in 1791.
January 13th, 1999 a 17-year-old girl named Hae is manually strangled, to death. Six weeks later Hae’s ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, is convinced of the murder. He is given a life sentence, plus thirty years, for his crime. Jay was the main witness at the trial. His story is as follows.
New details emerge in the case of illegal alien Adrian Espinosa-Flores who was charged last week with involuntary manslaughter while driving under the influence and leaving the scene of a fatal crash. According to a newly released affidavit, illegal alien Espinosa- Flores had twice the legal alcohol limit when slammed his Ford F-250 into the back of Johnson County Master Deputy Brandon Collins during a routine traffic stop on September 11, 2016. While Officer Collins sat in his patrol car, he was hit so forcefully that his car became wedged between the SUV he pulled over and Espinosa-Flores’ truck. The incredible impact between his patrol car and Espinosa-Flores’ truck engulfed both vehicles in flames as Collins remained pinned between two cars tragically resulting in his death.
In this case the defendant’s sentence was death by
The judge declares the “Murder in the first degree—premeditated homicide—is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts. One man is dead. The life of another is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds as to the guilt of the accused … then you must declare him not guilty. If, however, there is no reasonable doubt, then he must be found guilty.
The last thing he saw was the door of his room being pulled open, his sister was screaming, his mother ran out in front of her in her blouse (as his sister had taken off some of her clothes after she had fainted to make it easier for her to
A murder is a punishable crime which involves the killing of one person by another. The basic elements of murder include killing someone with the intent to kill, killing someone one with the intent of serious body harm, killing someone with recklessness and killing someone through violence. In order to convict someone of an attempt to murder, there should be strong evidence which shows the suspect took a major step towards the target with the intention to kill. There are multiple court rulings in the past that specify this vital point, ‘direct step’ and not mere preparation. As in the current case scenario, there is no evidence to show that any such attempts been made in order to murder the targeted victim (Theoharis, “Attempted Murder").