It is not the tobacco companies fault for peoples overusing tobacco products and using tobacco incorrectly. When people buy tobacco products they should how to use and know when they are using the product too much. Tobacco companies do not teach you how to use the product they would think that person would know how to use the tobacco product already. If that person does not know how to use that product you should not use it. Tobacco companies warn you in the
This new type of technology should be regulated by the Food and Drug Administration to ensure the product is safe for use during the manufacturing stages. It should also be sold to consumer’s who are qualified to purchase the product. E-cigarettes have many positive affects that could be beneficial for the future and could also save hundreds of thousands of
But, for cigarettes and alcohol to be legal herb should be legal to its better and health and has way more benefits than alcohol and cigarettes combined. There’s negatives to everything, look for the positives marijuana does for people and how bad will or can it hurt you and if its less then other drugs then making it legalized would be the only answer that made any sense whatsoever. The time has come from a decision has to be made either legalize or keep it banned but, either way you have people smoking it everywhere so might as well make some money on it then spend money trying to find people who do and taking people to jail or prison for possession. The states could save money in housing, catching people over borders, drug test, gang deals, and less bad guys to deal with, which means less police officers lives at risk! The United States should just legalize marijuana: people smoke it as is now, the government can tax it, and people can use it for stress, pain, thinking, and for
The company pretends to give the consumer a choice. Watters demonstrates this in his narrative while discussing how the advertisers will market their product. “Second, it suggested that the choice of taking medication for depression should be as simple and worry-free as buying a cough syrup or antihistamine” (Watters 524). Watter’s use of the word “choice” shows that the marketers want their customers to feel like they have a choice in whether they buy the product or not. This also shows that the consumer still has some autonomy over whether they believe they need the product or not, but it still coaxes them into buying the new drug.
An example of moral imagination is from the company nestle foods. When the trend of food advertisement to young children are high sugar, high fat products, nestle food choose no to do that but instead create healthier products to stay competitive in the market. Enron and other companies can follow suit this trend. Enron at the time , complicitly work with other businesses. tHus, an ingeneous solution that would be proben to become more ethical but also equally successful can be attractive to these businesses.
Some have resorted to other drugs to get past the absence of tobacco. Overall, this method has not helped much. Smoker have not disappeared but have been displaced. In summary, Cigarettes should continue to be legal because it prevents the need for contraband tobacco, keeps kids from using it to a minimum, and countries that have banned it affect the users. We need to keep them regulated and slowly campaign people to stop smoking.
Before learning the side effects, issues, and dangers of the use of electronic cigarettes, I was under the impression that they weren’t harmful. I believed they were the safer option and if you weren’t doing it frequently or if it didn’t contain nicotine, then there was no issue in doing it. E- Cigarettes are marketed as a way of kicking an addiction to actual cigarettes, but anything inhaled into your lungs is not benefiting your personal health. But before, I did not know this and wasn’t necessarily against them. Truthfully, people in my close family use them and I thought it was a great way of ending a conventional cigarette addiction, and this made me wonder how bad they could possibly be.
First it could damage their local economies. Secondly it might not even stop the use of the tobacco products, or cause greater problems involving them. It’s a very complex issue to solve for them. The best ideas I could give for dealing with the main reason for the ban, the health of their people and the children, is education and regulation. Put information out there to showcase the dangers of cigarettes.
Because of the surveillance of consumers by retail anthropologist, they both impact back and forth. In reality, the retail industry improve their business by learning consumers habit or favorite shopping. And consumers feel excited with their rewards, coupon or voucher; even though these are only couple bucks. Thus, the surveillance of consumers by retail anthropologist is the best way improving retail industry, keeping track consumers loyalty, and being used with security purpose. Because of their good purpose; therefore the government should not suspend the using of surveillance of consumers by retail
2014.) Although this article is old, the same incidents are taking place, yet consumers still continue to purchase from this franchise. Personally, after researching this evidence, I will not purchase any chicken from KFC again. In comparison to my previous article on Woolworths’ unethical practice, they focus more on the quality of their products and good citizenship. This results in Woolworths attracting a different consumer and target market and indirectly ensures that their sales remain sustainable.