Sainsbury: The Unjust Recruitment Process

1397 Words6 Pages
Task 3.2:
The unjust recruitment procedure based on favoritism and personal ties often creates implications for management to achieve its goals and objectives (Armstrong and Redmond, 2010). Information was collected through primary and secondary sources to highlight the process of recruiting problems and concerns of the local population. It has been observed that sales of the few Sainsbury stores have adopted the strategy of hiring staff through personal connections, as managers and supervisors hire employees through personal connections. However, Sainsbury's top management is engaged in an innovative selection and incorporation process to hire a strategic workforce capable of creating value for stakeholders.
Task 3.3:
Management creates plans
…show more content…
This system helps management judge how to sequence production to make a profit and create value for stakeholders. Sainsbury uses the operational information system to program and manage various operations to make decisions to improve the quality of goods and services.
The Decision Support System:
TheSainsbury uses the decision support system to make decisions related to marketing and finance to improve sales through the quality and image of the brand to attract more customers. The decision support system analyses, examines data on marketing, sales and finance to judge which decisions can add value to the business and stakeholders.
Task 4.2:
“A project management is the process of managing a project with a project team and team leader, to coordinate all activities and tasks in a cost effective and time frame manner to complete a project to achieve its
…show more content…
It is noted that it accepts all projects with IRR equal to the higher cost of capital to add value to the investment proposal. If you choose between alternatives, choose the project with the highest IRR as long as it equals or exceeds the cost of capital. The Sainsbury administration is using NPV, IRR and discounted cash flow methods to evaluate investment projects.
The approaches and decision-making theories associated with the subfield of foreign policy analysis are unique in international relations because of their focus on specific human agents behind each foreign policy option. Instead of generic deductive deductive systems, such as those found in game theory, a more detailed and particularistic explanation of human action is sought. In addition to this trend approach, a decision-making approach requires that information from multiple levels of analysis be collected and summarized in parallel when decision-makers collect and summarize that
Open Document