Case Study: Sizemore Vs. Erickson

415 Words2 Pages
. In this case, there is no valid contract between Sizemore and Erickson for which they hadn’t no agreement. As I know, the essential of a valid contract are: Agreement- offer and acceptance, consideration, contractual capacity, legal object. Therefore, according to the principle of unjust enrichment that no person should be allowed to profit at another 's expense without making restitution for the reasonable value of any property, services, or other benefits that have been unfairly received and retained. Thus, Sizemore can recover for the work he has done. 2. On my opinion, the court should not grant the defendant’s requests for judgment on the pleading, and the exculpatory clause may not be enforceable against lily Ledbetter. An exculpatory

More about Case Study: Sizemore Vs. Erickson

Open Document