ipl-logo

Case Study: Stanko V. Montana Highways

554 Words3 Pages

Facts: Rudy Stanko was driving on the Montana State Highway 200 when he was pulled over by Officer Kenneth Breidenbach, a member of the Montana Highway Patrol. Stanko had been driving his vehicle at a steady 85 miles per hour at a location that was “narrow, had no shoulders, and was broken up by an occasional frost heave.” This location also included curves and hills which obscured vision of the roadway head. The actual roadway held no other drivers at this time during the day. Stanko had been driving his new 1996 Chevrolet Camaro, with brakes, tires, and a steering wheel that were all in perfect operating conditions. Office Breidenbach issued him a ticket for violating Section 61-8-303(1) of Montana’s basic rule regarding the speed vehicles are allowed on Montana Highways. The ground for this ticket was that Stanko was driving his vehicle at a speed Breidenbach decided was unsafe to do so.

Procedural …show more content…

City of Rockford (1972) regarding the values vague statutes offend, which had two elements it must meet. First, the laws would have to give a person of ordinary intelligence an opportunity to know what’s prohibited. Second, the laws must provide explicit standards for those who apply them. Since the Attorney General of the State was unable to specify a speed that would have been reasonable for Stanko to be driving at the time and place of his arrest and enforced the idea the individual officers would have the choice over where and when they wanted to enforce the law, the Supreme Court of Montana found the rules regarding highway speeds in Section 61-8-303(1) to be void for vagueness and in violation of the due process clause of the Montana

Show More
Related

  • Nt1310 Unit 1 Case Studies

    1187 Words  | 5 Pages

    McKee was travelling below the posted speed limit, but may have been traveling faster than her wipers could sufficiently clear the water from her windshield. McKee failed to see Pedestrian 1 crossing Fletcher Avenue in enough time to take evasive action. The investigation of this crash has been completed and I request this case be inactivated.

    Read More

  • Nick Spears Vs. Texas Penal Code: Case Study

    1392 Words  | 6 Pages

    For a vehicle to be considered “operated” an individual only needs to take an action, rather successful or unsuccessful, in preparation toward operating the vehicle and on the roadway. In Whistler, the court held that the only requirement for “operating a vehicle” is taking an action to try to operate the vehicle. The court found that past precedents revealed that it was not necessary for the attempt to operate the vehicle to be successful. The court ruled with these precedents declaring that any action toward operating a vehicle was sufficient in finding that someone “operated a vehicle” in accordance with driving under the influence for the Texas statute. Also, in Morris, the court found that without an action displaying that a person put forth effort to attempt to operate the vehicle and if the vehicle was not on a roadway then the defendant could not be “operating” a vehicle under the

    Read More

  • Bobbi Kristina Brown Reaction Paper

    503 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bobbi Kristina “improperly attempted to change lanes in order to avoid the vehicle stopping in front of her.”

    Read More

  • How Did The Speed Limit In Wetaskiwin Around 1906

    2003 Words  | 9 Pages

    1906 Vehicle Registration Laws In 1906, the Provincial Government of Alberta passed a Provincial Motor Vehicle Act. This Act stated that the owners of vehicles must “register with a Provincial Secretary and take out a permit. He is given a licence and a number and is requested to carry the number exposed and to carry lights at night, bearing the number on the glass…” Today, you don’t have to be a male to register a vehicle, but you still need to carry a license plate and have lights on your vehicle.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Clark V. Arizona, 548 US

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    Under Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-502, does Aaron Wilson, 1) suffer from a mental disease or defect at the time of the incident, and 2) know right from wrong at the time of the incident; and will therefore be found guilty except insane? A.R.S § 13-502 states “a person may be found guilty except insane if at the time of the commission of the criminal act, the person was afflicted with a mental disorder or defect of such severity that the person did not know the criminal act was wrong.” Ariz. Rev. Stat.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Driving While Stupid By Dave Barry

    636 Words  | 3 Pages

    A bus in China was the fourth example, where Berry witnessed the bus driver vie for road space with anything from a truck to an ox-drawn cart. He even recounted how the bus driver would use the bus itself to shove pedestrians out of the way! Having given these examples, he then went on to explain exactly why Miami drivers are worse than any others in the world, starting with the way motorists completely disregard stop signs as if they were mailboxes. Berry made a quip about how the police have stopped trying to enforce traffic laws, and would allow you to drive away with a body in your trunk if it were your first

    Read More

  • Palko V. Connecticut Supreme Court Case Study

    628 Words  | 3 Pages

    Today marks the 80th anniversary of the devastating Supreme Court case of Palko v. Connecticut[1] in which the Supreme Court held that the 5th amendment right against Double Jeopardy did not apply to state courts. While Palko[2] was eventually overturned by the landmark case of Benton v. Maryland[3], Palko stood for 32 years as an impediment to peoples Constitutional rights. The Case[4] The case behind Palko perhaps explains the Courts dim view. Late one evening in 1935, Frank Palko[5] broke into a music store in Fairfield County Connecticut[6] , stole a phonograph and fled the scene on foot. Mr. Palko was quickly cornered by a police officer who he shot and killed.

    Read More

  • The Court Case Of State Of Nebraska V. Gary E. Heitman

    1549 Words  | 7 Pages

    The court case of State of Nebraska v. Gary E. Heitman deals with the conviction of Heitman on charges of criminal conspiracy to commit first degree sexual assault on a minor. “Heitman contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict and that he was entrapped” (Heitman p.1) while the court concluded that “there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction” (Heitman p.1) and “further determined that the district court was not clearly wrong in finding that Heitman was predisposed to commit the crime and that thus, the district court was correct in rejecting his entrapment defense.” (Heitman p.1). I agree with the court’s rejection of the entrapment defense based upon things discussed in other entrapment cases and ideas brought up by

    Read More

  • Ohio V. Clark Case Study

    776 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the case of Ohio v. Clark, Darius Clark states that by using a three and a half year olds word as testimony, it violates his sixth and fourteenth amendment rights. He argues that this child is not “mature enough to give reliable testimony, uninfluenced by those who might try to shape what they say and unaffected by the pressure of a trial setting” (Denniston 2). Although the man pleaded guilty to the charges of child abuse and received 28 years of prison time, he knows that his sixth amendment right was violated and is fighting against it. The use of someone that “is incompetent to appear in court as a witness” violates the sixth amendment and the fourteenth amendment pertaining to the Due Process Clause filed under it in Section I (Ohio

    Read More

  • Unit 5 Health And Social Care Level 3 Unit 2

    154 Words  | 1 Pages

    The driver of Unit 1 advised that one of the witnesses waved her to come out the intersection. The driver of Unit 1 advised the that she didn't see Unit 2 traveling southbound in the fast lane. The driver of Unit 2 advised that she was traveling southbound on George Wallace Drive when the driver of Unit 1 pulled out in front of her. Both drivers advised that they didn't see each other. Mallarie Mosley and Benjamin Hicks were the two witnesses on scene.

    Read More

  • Light Breaking Law

    1682 Words  | 7 Pages

    His objection comes from the need to consistently apply legal principles in each situation. If it is acceptable for me to run through the light in this situation, then how can we apply the traffic laws with any integrity? Would there not be other situations in which a person might be able to argue that he is also free to ignore the law and run the light? Is it acceptable to go through the light only when one is sick? But how sick is sick?

    Read More

  • Big Brothers Eye In The Sky Analysis

    545 Words  | 3 Pages

    Locker started the article off talking about ever since the Model T rolled out of Ford’s factory that americans have wanted to go fast. He stated “That while the majority of motorists would never dream of trying to outrun the long arm of the law, soon, however they won't

    Read More

  • Nolan-Pryor Case Analysis

    1211 Words  | 5 Pages

    Facts On Friday, September 4, 2015, approximately at 3:00 PM, Dr. Melanie Nolan-Pryor (46) and her husband, Dr. Brent Pryor (46), left a luncheon in Sacramento in separate cars. Dr. Nolan-Pryor was driving her blue 2013 Lexus SUV, while Dr. Pryor was in his silver 2014 Toyota Prius. Traffic on I-80 was slow; Dr. Nolan-Pryor estimated her speed range from 20 to 40 miles per hour. As the couple approached the Mace Boulevard exit, Dr. Nolan-Pryor’s car was located “in the lane to the left of the right-hand lane”, and Dr. Pryor was traveling in about 10 car lengths from her in the lane to her right, with a black Toyota Tundra truck in front of him and a red Ford Escape SUV behind him.

    Read More

  • State V. Barrett Case Study

    330 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the case of State v. Barrett (1996), a drug detection team was brought in to conduct a random drug search of the high school on May 3, 1995 in St. Tammany Parish. Six classes were chosen by the principal, who had mentioned some of the selected classes were known to have some of the "problem" students, including the 18 year-old defendant. During the third classroom search, the defendant 's classroom, students were asked to empty their pockets and leave the room. The dogs were brought in and one of the dog 's alerted a smell on the defendant 's wallet. After the principal searched the wallet and found $400 in cash, he placed it in a different location, which the dog alerted on once again.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Road Warrior By Dave Barry

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    COOKING DINNER???”(93). I personally found myself in that predicament countless times and detest drivers who do this. He makes his point clear in a humorous manner when he states, “let's be more considerate, OK? Otherwise I will kill you.” (??).

    Read More

More about Case Study: Stanko V. Montana Highways

Open Document