I heard the Judge blame Jamie, not the mother, for not performing visitation. The Judge did say that Jamie’s needs would change, while completely ignoring the actions of the mother that have led to the alienation. The mother sat there smugly as the Judge let her own daughter be blamed. The actions of the Judge that day combined with her older daughter’s justified desire not to be anywhere near her mother has emboldened the mother leading to her complete lack of meaningful cooperation with the Parenting Plan.
8.
When attempts were being made to set up visitation with JP, did you take into account
JP 's expressed desires to be allowed to compete in various competitions and barrel racing? If so explain why you did not wish to work
…show more content…
Again I was to be a spectator with no contact with my daughter during these periods.
9.
Explain in detail what efforts you made to attend JP 's competitions (i.e., barrel racing, etc.)? If so, list the dates and events that you have personally attended. Likewise if you have elected to miss competitions explain why you chose to miss them rather than attend?
The terms of the visitation as laid out by the mother were not visitation in a meaningful sense. Again I was to be a spectator with no meaningful contact with my daughter during these periods. I was not to be allowed unescorted contact with Jamie. Her mother or friends were always to be present.
10.
State specifically by month, day and year which weekends you claimed to have missed a visitation opportunity wherein both parents mutually agreed upon the dates for such visitation to occur in the city where the Mother resides with the child. As part of your response, please state in what way your intended visitation would not have interfered with JP 's attendance in school or in the child 's extracurricular
…show more content…
Continuing alienation actions of the mother
Knowledge of visitation periods
Verification of the insults and derogatory behavior of the mother towards the father in front of both daughters.
12.
Give the name, address and telephone number of any expert witness that you may call relating to the facts or circumstances of this case and a brief statement as to the testimony you intend to elicit from said witness.
None at this time.
13.
Did you invite JP to vacation with you and KP in Maui Hawaii Christmas of 2014?
Yes. Jamie’s travel period was to short she arrived in the afternoon of December 20 and departed in the morning December 26. The mother was adamant that her travel time could not be extended and that there was no time for Jamie to go to Hawaii.
Did you invite JP to vacation with you in Whistler Mountain, Vancouver Thanksgiving 2015? If the answer is no, please explain your reasons for not including JP in the above holiday
Father objected to the move arguing that the move exceeded the limitations presented by A.R.S. 25-408 because Payson is approximately 138 miles from Eagar (Father’s place of residence). He petitioned the court to prevent the relocation of the children with Mother. The court denied Father’s request as the distance of the move from Show Low to Payson is 90 miles, less than the 100 mile limitation per Arizona
a. What type of EAP assistance was offered to Ms. Miller? i. Ms. Boles stated Ms. Miller mentioned her two children were in daycare, but she needed to remove child from daycare due to the cost. Ms. Miller was advised to contact EAP for assistance with child care referrals. Ms. Miller was also encouraged to seek assistance from family members to assist with her child care needs. b. Did Ms. Miller receive other disciplinary actions, i.e. written reprimand, suspensions, etc?
Loshane works at the local Sonic’s restaurant. Loshane hopes to increase his working hours. Loshane attends community events with MHS and family. Per referring agency, Loshane biological parent’s parental rights are terminated.
On October 14, 2015, I went to the Arizona Superior Court at Downtown Phoenix. I went to the room 503 in the Central Court Building, which is a family court. The judge that was in the room is Paul J McMurdie. He begin hearing at 1:30 P.M. and there are a 5 hearing during the day that I visited. One of the case that he hearing is FC2010-006759, Hall vs. Gollins.
I find myself writing you asking for guidance within the walls of the 12th Justice System. My daughter continues to be in the middle of ledge issues with the adopted mother of my granddaughter. However, this is a family matter, in which we will have to figure out on our end.
In Wyman v. James, the Supreme Court held that the beneficiary of the Aid to the Families with the Dependent Children must allow a house visit by a case manager, when the law requires it, or relinquish her entitlement to open help. The Supreme Court did not view it as a pursuit in fourth amendment terms. Regardless of the possibility that the visit were a pursuit, the Court said it was sensible: it was made for the advantage of the kid; it was "a gentle means" of guaranteeing that duty stores are appropriately spent; the case manager was not a "uniformed authority"; and the beneficiary had the decision of summoning her entitlement to decline or relinquishing the advantages. Three contradicting Justices (William Douglas, William Brennan, Thurgood
She currently lives with her mother, who is divorced from her father. She has one older sister, who is currently away at college and a younger sister from her father’s previous relationship. According to her mother, her maternal grandmother used to live them until she died six years ago. The loss of the grandmother was very difficult for Client’s A mother, as the grandmother was the 2nd caregiver due to the divorce. At this point, Client A inconsistently
T.B., 207 N.J. 294 at 301; J.L., 410 N.J. Super. 159 at 166. In T.B., a mother was under the assumption that her parents were home; mistakenly left her child at home alone, the Division of Youth and Family Services found that the mother was negligent. T.B., 207 N.J. 294 at 297. However, the court held that the defendant did not fail to "exercise a minimum degree of care" under N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c)(4)(b), therefore her conduct was not grossly negligent or reckless. Id. at 302.
While in college, he returned often to his brother’s home and often to Mr. Carson’s home during summers and holidays. Mr. Carson claimed that he provided David with financial support while he was in college, gave him financial and moral advice, and attended David’s graduation from college. Id. When Mr. Carson sought two weeks of FMLA leave to care for his grandson, his request was denied despite his claim that he was a “parent” under the FMLA to David.
Introduction A 5-year old boy, whose parents are undergoing a divorce, reports that he was sexually molested by his father. His mother takes him to a psychologist who evaluates him using various techniques, including a clinical interview, Anatomically Correct Dolls, and a test she has created called “Detection of Childhood Abuse Test” (DCAT). The psychologist is called to testify in court about her findings. (1) What are the issues related to the validity of using Anatomically Correct Dolls for this purpose?
This gives her no time to see her kids because they will most likely be sleeping. “Tis night when I am free” (Document 2). This goes to show that she had very long hours. She went to work before dawn and didn’t get
The problem arose when the parents were dissatisfied with the due process hearing;
Issue: Kent was unaware of his case's transfer of jurisdiction from the juvenile court of D.C. to the state's regular district court. Was the juvenile court's waiver of jurisdiction valid? Would the individual transferred to the adult court still have rights that were applicable in juvenile court? Did the juvenile court conduct a full investigation for Kent? Important information might have been revealed had an investigation been performed.
Kent had an earlier criminal history with the juvenile court. He was arrested at the age of fourteen for burglary and robbery, and in result he was put on probation under the guidance of his single mother. In accordance to Kent’s arrest at age sixteen, his attorney had
With the finalization of my parents’ divorce came a series of custody cases. Although, my siblings and I preferred to stay with our mother, it wasn’t up to us. Waiting for the verdict in that courtroom was very petrifying. After, what felt like hours, the judge had decided. “Case summary: after carefully examining both parents, the parent fit for full custody will be Ms. Salazar,” Said the